Evaluasi Pelayanan Publik di Pelabuhan Roro Dompak Provinsi Kepulauan Riau
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37329/ganaya.v7i3.3356Keywords:
Evaluasi, Pelayanan Publik, PelabuhanAbstract
The service standards for the Roro Dompak port Kepulauan Riau Province are the parameters used as guidelines for the implementation of services and the objectivity of the criteria for assessing the quality of services to the community so that there is guidance on the obligations and promises of organizers to stakeholders in the context of quality, fast, easy, affordable and measurable services. The aim of the research is to analyze the evaluation of Public Services at Roro Dompak port Kepulauan Riau Province. Qualitative Research Method with primary data collection such as closed interviews and secondary data obtained from the Kepulauan Riau Province Transportation Service. Data analysis uses triangulation techniques and uses grand theory based on two approaches: process-oriented evaluation and results-based evaluation. Process-oriented evaluation focuses on the process of providing public services, including accountability, responsibility and responsiveness. Results-based evaluation focuses on public service outcomes, including effectiveness, economics, and efficiency. The research results show that the Roro Dompak port Kepulauan Riau Province has several strengths and weaknesses in providing public services to the community. Its advantages include its strategic location, adequate basic facilities and efficient operations. However, the weaknesses are limited capacity, inadequate infrastructure, and lack of transparency. This study also identified several areas that need to be improved, including increasing port capacity, improving infrastructure, and increasing transparency and accountability. Additionally, the study suggests that ports should focus on improving their responsiveness to community needs, increasing effectiveness in providing services, and reducing costs. Overall, this study provides a comprehensive evaluation of the public service performance of Roro Dompak Port and highlights areas that need improvement to increase its effectiveness in providing public services to the community Kepulauan Riau Province.
References
Álvarez-SanJaime, Ó., Cantos-Sánchez, P., Moner-Colonques, R., & Sempere-Monerris, J. J. (2015). The impact on port competition of the integration of port and inland transport services. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 80, 291–302.
Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American Economic Review, 90(1), 166–193.
Bovens, M., Schillemans, T., & Hart, P. (2008). Does public accountability work? An assessment tool. Public Administration, 86(1), 225–242.
Caldeirinha, V. R., Felício, J. A., da Cunha, S. F., & Luz, L. M. da. (2018). The nexus between port governance and performance. Maritime Policy & Management, 45(7),
Cullinane, K., & Song, D.-W. (2002). Port privatization policy and practice. Transport Reviews, 22(1), 55–75.
De Matons, J. G. (1970). Ports as a Public Service: The Evolution in France and in the United States. Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce, 2.
Denhardt, J. Vinzant., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The new public service: serving, not steering. Routledge.
Dykstra, C. A. (1939). The qoest for responsibility. American Political Science Review, 33(1), 1012–1013.
Haralambides, H. (2017). Globalization, public sector reform, and the role of ports in international supply chains. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 19(1), 1–51.
Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public Money and Management, 25(1), 27–34.
Hershman, M. J. (2017). Harbor Management: A New Role for the Public Port. In Urban Ports and Harbor Management (pp. 3–22). Routledge.
Jacobs, C. (2003). Managing organizational responsiveness. DUV.
Leiren, M. D. (2015). Scope of Negative Integration: A Comparative Analysis of Post, Public Transport and Port Services. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(3), 609–626.
Levine, M. E., & Forrence, J. L. (1990). Regulatory Capture, Public Interest, and the Public Agenda: Toward a Synthesis. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 6.
Liu, T., Yue, Q., & Wu, X. (2016). Design and implementation of cloud-based port logistics public service platform. Proceedings of 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer and Communications, ICCC 2015, 234–239.
Negandhi, A. R., & Reimann, B. C. (1973). Task Environment, Decentralization and Organizational Effectiveness. Human Relations, 26(2), 203–214.
Odongo, N. H., & Wang, D. (2018). Corporate responsibility, ethics and accountability. Social Responsibility Journal, 14(1), 111–122.
Oktafani, F., & Suryawardani, B. (2019). The effectiveness of short message service advertising using EPIC model on consumer perception and purchase intention. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1375(1), 012091.
Olson, D. J. (2017). Public Port Accountability: A Framework for Evaluation. In Urban Ports and Harbor Management (pp. 307–331). Routledge.
Roper, J., & Schoenberger-Orgad, M. (2011). State-Owned Enterprises: Issues of Accountability and Legitimacy. Management Communication Quarterly, 25(4), 693–709.
Salim, G. M., & Woodward, S. A. (1992). The manager monitor. In Rediscofavering Public Services Management. McGraw-Hill Co.
Sanderson, I. (1996). Evaluation, learning and the effectiveness of public services Towards a quality of public service model. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 9(5–6), 90–108.
Sinha, D., & Roy Chowdhury, S. (2019). Optimizing private and public mode of operation in major ports of India for better customer service. Indian Growth and Development Review, 12(1), 2–37.
Tijan, E., Jović, M., Panjako, A., & Žgaljić, D. (2021). The Role of Port Authority in Port Governance and Port Community System Implementation. Sustainability , 13(5), 2795.
Vaggelas, G. K., & Pallis, A. A. (2010). Passenger ports: services provision and their benefits. Maritime Policy & Management, 37(1), 73–89.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Pamella Dwi Ariyanti Susanto, Rumzi Samin, Rudy Subiyakto (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
An author who publishes in the Ganaya : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora agrees to the following terms:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.
