Negosiasi Makna Praktik Tarot dalam Kehidupan Religius Masyarakat Hindu di Kecamatan Buleleng
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37329/ganaya.v9i2.5355Keywords:
Tarot, Meaning Negotiation, Hindu Religiosity, Social PhenomenologyAbstract
The development of modernity has not only transformed patterns of social life, but has also given rise to increasingly personal forms of reflective spirituality, one of which is tarot practice. In the context of Hindu communities in Buleleng District, this practice is significant because it emerges within a strong local religious system and gives rise to processes of acceptance, restriction, and reinterpretation. This study aims to analyze the meaning of tarot as a medium of self-reflection and to explain how that meaning is negotiated within the religious life of Hindu communities. This study employs a qualitative approach with a social phenomenology perspective. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation involving nine informants, and were then analyzed thematically and interpretatively. The findings show that tarot is not understood as a substitute for religion nor as a source of absolute spiritual authority, but rather as a reflective medium for understanding inner conditions, life experiences, and considerations in decision-making. Acceptance of tarot occurs selectively through the negotiation of meaning between individuals’ subjective experiences, religious normative boundaries, and the social legitimacy operating within the community. These findings affirm that contemporary Hindu religiosity is adaptive toward new reflective practices as long as they do not displace religion as the primary framework of spiritual life.
References
Ammerman, N. T. (2014). Finding Religion In Everyday Life. Sociology of Religion, 75(2), 189-207.
Ammerman, N. T. (2016). Lived Religion As An Emerging Field: An Assessment Of Its Contours And Frontiers. Nordic Journal of Religion and Society, 29(2), 83-99.
Ammerman, N. T. (2020). Rethinking Religion: Toward A Practice Approach. American Journal of Sociology, 126(1), 6-51.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction Of Reality: A Treatise In The Sociology Of Knowledge. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective And Method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Gauthier, F. (2025). Wellbeing-Oriented Spiritualities As A Global Phenomenon In Risk Societies. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 47(2), 246-264.
Gauthier, F., Martikainen, T., & Woodhead, L. (2013). Acknowledging A Global Shift: A Primer For Thinking About Religion In Consumer Societies. Implicit Religion, 16(3), 261-276.
Gog, S. (2016). Alternative Forms Of Spirituality And The Socialization Of A Self-Enhancing Subjectivity: Features Of The Post-Secular Religious Space In Contemporary Romania. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Sociologia, 61(2), 97-124.
Houtman, D., & Aupers, S. (2007). The Spiritual Turn And The Decline Of Tradition: The Spread Of Post‐Christian Spirituality In 14 Western Countries, 1981-2000. Journal for the Scientific Study Of Religion, 46(3), 305-320.
Houtman, D., Aupers, S., & Heelas, P. (2009). Christian Religiosity And New Age Spirituality: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. Journal For The Scientific Study of Religion, 48(1), 169-179.
Knibbe, K., & Kupari, H. (2020). Theorizing Lived Religion: Introduction. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 35(2), 157-176.
Knoblauch, H. (2008). Spirituality And Popular Religion In Europe. Social Compass, 55(2), 140-153.
Krow, M., Brooks, T. R., Hernandez, A., & Allen, A. (2025). Tarot’s influence On Mindfulness, Well-Being, And Perceived Control. Spiritual Healing: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Psikoterapi, 6(2), 183-194.
Mas’ud, M. A., Ichwan, M. N., Shoodiq, S. A. J., & Achmad, D. (2025). Transformation Of The Spiritual Paradigm In Formal And Non-Formal Religious Interaction In The Modern Era. Jurnal Sosiologi Agama dan Teologi Indonesia, 3(1), 273-389.
McGuire, M. B. (2008). Lived Religion: Faith And Practice In Everyday Life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Perez-Vela, R. (2023). The Mediatization Of Religious Practices In Urban Daily Life: The Peruvian Case. Religions, 14(5), 649.
Schutz, A. (1967). The Phenomenology Of The Social World. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Semetsky, I. (2006). Tarot As A Projective Technique. Spirituality and Health International, 7(4), 187-197.
Semetsky, I. (2011). Tarot Images And Spiritual Education: The Three I’s Model. International Journal of Children’s Spirituality, 16(3), 249-260.
Woodhead, L. (2011). Five Concepts Of Religion. International Review of Sociology, 21(1), 121-143.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ni Luh Putu Ayu Rantauyani, Ida Bagus Wika Krishna, I Nyoman Suka Ardiyasa (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
An author who publishes in the Ganaya : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora agrees to the following terms:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.



