Negosiasi Makna Praktik Tarot dalam Kehidupan Religius Masyarakat Hindu di Kecamatan Buleleng

Authors

  • Ni Luh Putu Ayu Rantauyani Institut Agama Hindu Negeri Mpu Kuturan Singaraja
  • Ida Bagus Wika Krishna Institut Agama Hindu Negeri Mpu Kuturan Singaraja
  • I Nyoman Suka Ardiyasa Institut Agama Hindu Negeri Mpu Kuturan Singaraja

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37329/ganaya.v9i2.5355

Keywords:

Tarot, Meaning Negotiation, Hindu Religiosity, Social Phenomenology

Abstract

The development of modernity has not only transformed patterns of social life, but has also given rise to increasingly personal forms of reflective spirituality, one of which is tarot practice. In the context of Hindu communities in Buleleng District, this practice is significant because it emerges within a strong local religious system and gives rise to processes of acceptance, restriction, and reinterpretation. This study aims to analyze the meaning of tarot as a medium of self-reflection and to explain how that meaning is negotiated within the religious life of Hindu communities. This study employs a qualitative approach with a social phenomenology perspective. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation involving nine informants, and were then analyzed thematically and interpretatively. The findings show that tarot is not understood as a substitute for religion nor as a source of absolute spiritual authority, but rather as a reflective medium for understanding inner conditions, life experiences, and considerations in decision-making. Acceptance of tarot occurs selectively through the negotiation of meaning between individuals’ subjective experiences, religious normative boundaries, and the social legitimacy operating within the community. These findings affirm that contemporary Hindu religiosity is adaptive toward new reflective practices as long as they do not displace religion as the primary framework of spiritual life.

References

Ammerman, N. T. (2014). Finding Religion In Everyday Life. Sociology of Religion, 75(2), 189-207.

Ammerman, N. T. (2016). Lived Religion As An Emerging Field: An Assessment Of Its Contours And Frontiers. Nordic Journal of Religion and Society, 29(2), 83-99.

Ammerman, N. T. (2020). Rethinking Religion: Toward A Practice Approach. American Journal of Sociology, 126(1), 6-51.

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction Of Reality: A Treatise In The Sociology Of Knowledge. New York, NY: Anchor Books.

Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective And Method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Gauthier, F. (2025). Wellbeing-Oriented Spiritualities As A Global Phenomenon In Risk Societies. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 47(2), 246-264.

Gauthier, F., Martikainen, T., & Woodhead, L. (2013). Acknowledging A Global Shift: A Primer For Thinking About Religion In Consumer Societies. Implicit Religion, 16(3), 261-276.

Gog, S. (2016). Alternative Forms Of Spirituality And The Socialization Of A Self-Enhancing Subjectivity: Features Of The Post-Secular Religious Space In Contemporary Romania. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Sociologia, 61(2), 97-124.

Houtman, D., & Aupers, S. (2007). The Spiritual Turn And The Decline Of Tradition: The Spread Of Post‐Christian Spirituality In 14 Western Countries, 1981-2000. Journal for the Scientific Study Of Religion, 46(3), 305-320.

Houtman, D., Aupers, S., & Heelas, P. (2009). Christian Religiosity And New Age Spirituality: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. Journal For The Scientific Study of Religion, 48(1), 169-179.

Knibbe, K., & Kupari, H. (2020). Theorizing Lived Religion: Introduction. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 35(2), 157-176.

Knoblauch, H. (2008). Spirituality And Popular Religion In Europe. Social Compass, 55(2), 140-153.

Krow, M., Brooks, T. R., Hernandez, A., & Allen, A. (2025). Tarot’s influence On Mindfulness, Well-Being, And Perceived Control. Spiritual Healing: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Psikoterapi, 6(2), 183-194.

Mas’ud, M. A., Ichwan, M. N., Shoodiq, S. A. J., & Achmad, D. (2025). Transformation Of The Spiritual Paradigm In Formal And Non-Formal Religious Interaction In The Modern Era. Jurnal Sosiologi Agama dan Teologi Indonesia, 3(1), 273-389.

McGuire, M. B. (2008). Lived Religion: Faith And Practice In Everyday Life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Perez-Vela, R. (2023). The Mediatization Of Religious Practices In Urban Daily Life: The Peruvian Case. Religions, 14(5), 649.

Schutz, A. (1967). The Phenomenology Of The Social World. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

Semetsky, I. (2006). Tarot As A Projective Technique. Spirituality and Health International, 7(4), 187-197.

Semetsky, I. (2011). Tarot Images And Spiritual Education: The Three I’s Model. International Journal of Children’s Spirituality, 16(3), 249-260.

Woodhead, L. (2011). Five Concepts Of Religion. International Review of Sociology, 21(1), 121-143.

Downloads

Published

12-05-2026

How to Cite

Ayu Rantauyani, N. L. P., Wika Krishna, I. B., & Suka Ardiyasa, I. N. (2026). Negosiasi Makna Praktik Tarot dalam Kehidupan Religius Masyarakat Hindu di Kecamatan Buleleng. Ganaya : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 9(2), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.37329/ganaya.v9i2.5355

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)