Dampak Penerapan Kebijakan Dosen Pada Program Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Authors

  • Chalid Luneto Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
  • Yanti Aneta Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
  • Rustam Tohopi Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37329/ganaya.v8i4.4899

Keywords:

Institutional Policy, Faculty Participation, Research and Community Service, Policy Evaluation, Adaptive Policy

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of institutional policies in research and community service programs at Universitas Negeri Gorontalo and their impact on faculty participation and institutional development. The research employed a qualitative method with a case study approach through in-depth interviews, field observations, and document analysis during the 2020-2024 period. Findings reveal significant dynamics in faculty participation. The DRTPM/DIKTI research scheme experienced a surge from 15 activities (2020) to 59 activities (2024), reflecting positive adaptation to national policies. However, there is high dependency on the PNBP scheme which dominates 80.4% of research activities (1,448 out of 1,801 total) and 74.1% of community service activities (1,125 out of 1,519 total) over five years. Top-down policies proved to generate resistance and decreased faculty motivation, particularly among junior faculty and those with lower functional positions. Conversely, faculties with internal support systems such as proposal clinics successfully increased participation significantly. Output quality varies greatly among faculties, with faculties having review and mentoring systems producing better publications in accredited journals and international proceedings. The research conclusion confirms that successful program implementation is determined by participatory policy design, adequate administrative support, and collaborative academic culture. Strategic implications include the need for reformulation of evaluation systems based on output quality and sustainable institutional transformation to strengthen the institution's position in national higher education.

References

Altbach, P. G. (2015). Academic Freedom: International Realities and Challenges. Higher Education, 41(1), 205–219.

Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.

Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University–Industry–Government Relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.

Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2003). Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. Verso.

Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-Determination Theory and Work Motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362.

Hood, C. (1991). A Public Management for All Seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (2019). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. In Corporate Governance (pp. 77–132). Gower.

Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi. (2021). Transformasi Penelitian Indonesia: Riset Berbasis Inovasi dan Kolaborasi. Jakarta: Kemenristekdikti.

Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. Russell Sage Foundation.

Mazmanian, D. A., & Sabatier, P. A. (1983). Implementation and Public Policy. Scott, Foresman.

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press.

Nugroho, R., & Suryadi, A. (2018). Policy Implementation in Higher Education: Evidence from Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 3(1), 45–56.

Pateman, C. (2012). Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge University Press.

Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (2015). External Control of Organizations—Resource Dependence Perspective. In Organizational Behavior 2 (pp. 355–370). Routledge.

Qorib, F. (2024). Tantangan dan Peluang Kolaborasi Antara Perguruan Tinggi dan Masyarakat Dalam Program Pengabdian di Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Society Empowerment, 2(2), 46–57.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suyatno, S., Mustiningsih, M., & Arifin, I. (2019). The Role of Leadership in Higher Education: A Case of Transformational Leadership in Indonesia. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(6), 15–25.

Wijayanti, D., & Mulyani, N. (2020). The Impact of Academic Culture on Lecturer Performance in Indonesian Universities. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 7(2), 112–123.

Downloads

Published

03-10-2025

How to Cite

Luneto, C., Aneta, Y. ., & Tohopi, R. . (2025). Dampak Penerapan Kebijakan Dosen Pada Program Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Universitas Negeri Gorontalo. Ganaya : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 8(4), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.37329/ganaya.v8i4.4899