Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Instruksional Dan Motivasi Kerja Guru Terhadap Kualitas Pembelajaran Sekolah Penggerak SMA Negeri Kota Semarang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37329/cetta.v8i2.4160Keywords:
Learning Quality, Instructional Leadership, Teacher Work Motivation, School MoverAbstract
Education report card data shows that the quality of learning in the indicators of learning methods and teacher motivation is not optimal. There is still a gap in each school that has the status of a school mover. The objectives of this study are: (1) to analyze the influence of instructional leadership on the quality of learning, (2) to analyze the influence of teachers' work motivation on the quality of learning, and (3) to analyze the joint influence of instructional leadership and teachers' work motivation on the quality of learning of the Semarang City State High School Mover. Quantitative research approach with survey method. Type of correlational research. The research population is 270 teachers and the research sample is 162 teachers. Data collection with questionnaires. Data analysis techniques with descriptive data analysis, prerequisite tests including normality tests, multicollinearity tests, heteroscedasticity tests, linearity tests and hypothesis tests including simple and multiple linear regression. The results of the study showed that: (1) the influence of instructional leadership on the quality of learning was 45.50%, with the regression equation Ŷ = 44.388 + 0.756X1 with a correlation coefficient value of 0.455. (2) the influence of teacher work motivation on the quality of learning was 36.80%, with the regression equation Ŷ = 56.466 + 0.758 X2 with a correlation coefficient value of 0.368. (3) the influence of instructional leadership and teacher work motivation on the quality of learning was 51.40%, with the equation Ŷ = 24.383 + 0.543 X1 + 0.384 X2. Then the correlation coefficient value r is 0.514. The conclusion of this study is that instructional leadership and teacher work motivation have an effect on the quality of learning by 51.40%.
References
Asmini, E. A. (2024). Pengaruh Supervisi Kepala Sekolah Dan Motivasi Kerja Guru Terhadap Kualitas Pembelajaran Guru. Jurnal Pendidikan, 1(2), 123-135.
Bastari, R. (2020). Motivasi Kerja Guru Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Universitas Pendidikan.
Day, C. G. (2016). The Impact Of School Leadership On Teacher Motivation And Student Achievement. London: Routledge.
Dwiyono, Y., Warman, W., Kurniawan, D., Atmaja, A. B. S., & Lorensius, L. (2022). Kepemimpinan Instruksional Kepala Sekolah Dalam Meningkatkan Efektivitas Pembelajaran. Scaffolding: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Dan Multikulturalisme, 4(3), 319-334.
Daryanto. (2023). Kualitas Pembelajaran: Strategi Dan Implementasi Untuk Hasil Belajar Optimal. Jakarta: Penerbit Andi.
Ghozali, I. D. (2020). Partial Least Square Konsep, Teknik Dan Aplikasi Menggunakan Program SmartPLS 3.0. Edisi 2. Semarang: Undip.
Hallinger, P. (2021). Instructional Leadership: Past, Present, And Future. Journal of Educational Leadership, 12-28.
Hattie, J. (2020). Visible Learning: A Synthesis Of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating To Achievement. London: Routledge.
Hidayat, R. (2021). Pengaruh Insentif Terhadap Motivasi Kerja Guru Di Sekolah Dasar. Yogyakarta: Andi.
Kusnandar. (2022). Pengembangan Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah. Jakarta: Kemendikbudristek.
Leithwood, K. (2020). Leadership That Influences Student Learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(4), 570-599.
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven Strong Claims About Successful School Leadership Revisited. School Leadership And Management, 28(1), 27-42.
Nurdadiyono, R. H. (2022). Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja Dan Kinerja Terhadap Kualitas Pembelajaran Guru. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 89-102.
Pratiwi, R. (2021). Psikologi Kinerja Guru. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Ryan, R. M. (2020). Intrinsic And Extrinsic Motivations In Education: Theory And Research. New York: Springer.
Raihani. (2020). Efektivitas Kepemimpinan Instruksional Dalam Pendidikan. Indonesian Journal of Education, 120-138.
Sugiyono, D. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Schunk, D. H. (2018). Motivation In Education: Theory, Research, And Applications. London: Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Skaalvik, E. M. (2017). Teacher Motivation And Job Satisfaction. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 29-58.
Suyanto, D. (2017). Standard Pembelajaran Berkualitas. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.
Sanjaya, W. (2022). Strategi Pembelajaran Berbasis Interaksi Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
Usman, H. (2019). Administrasi, Manajemen, Dan Kepemimpinan Dalam Pendidikan: Teori Dan Praktik. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Suratmin Suratmin, A. Y. Soegeng Ysh, Widya Kusumaningsih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
An author who publishes in the Cetta : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan agrees to the following terms:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.
