Monarchy, Symbolic Legitimacy, and Institutional Performance in Shaping Democratic Satisfaction in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37329/ganaya.v9i2.5289Keywords:
Democratic Legitimacy, Institutional Performance, Monarchy Trust, Political Support, Symbolic LegitimacyAbstract
This study examines how symbolic legitimacy and institutional performance interact to shape democratic satisfaction amid declining public trust in political institutions. Focusing on the United Kingdom and the Netherlands as contrasting majoritarian and consensus constitutional monarchies, it investigates whether trust in the monarchy increases democratic satisfaction, whether institutional performance strengthens this effect, and whether the magnitude differs across system types. Using a quantitative comparative design based on World Values Survey Wave 7 data, the study applies weighted logistic regression and interaction models to estimate direct and conditional effects. The findings show that trust in the monarchy is positively associated with democratic satisfaction and that this effect becomes stronger when citizens perceive representative institutions as performing effectively. Cross-system comparison further indicates that symbolic legitimacy plays a stronger role in the United Kingdom, where it functions more compensatorily within an adversarial political setting, while in the Netherlands it operates more complementarily within a consensus-oriented institutional environment. The study concludes that democratic legitimacy in constitutional monarchies is dual and context-dependent, emerging from the interaction between symbolic attachment and institutional performance. It contributes theoretically by clarifying the relationship between symbolic and performance-based legitimacy and methodologically by demonstrating the value of cross-national comparative modelling.
References
Bolin, N., Dahlberg, S., & Blombäck, S. (2023). The Stigmatisation Effect of the Radical Right on Voters’ Assessment of Political Proposals. West European Politics, 46(1), 100–121.
Brummel, L., & Blok, L. de. (2024). Do Political and Social Accountability Arrangements Increase Citizens’ Legitimacy Perceptions? A Vignette Experiment in the Netherlands. Public Management Review, 26(11).
Cruz, E., Torres, C. E., & Alqahtani, M. (2024). A Three-Level Approach to Examining the Relationship Between Categorical Beacons of Influence and Democracy in Western Europe. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society.
Devine, D., & Valgardsson, V. O. (2024). Stability and Change in Political Trust: Evidence and Implications from Six Panel Studies. European Journal of Political Research, 63, 478–497.
Donat, E., & Lenhart, S. (2025). Closeness to Citizens as a Source for Political Trust? A Comparison of Opinions on Local Parliaments and the European Parliament in 12 European Regions. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 9(1), 77–92.
Dunn, J. (2025). Crisis of Democracy or Crises in Democracies? Chinese Political Science.
Easton, D. (1965). A Systems Analysis of Political Life. John Wiley and Sons.
Eck, B., & Paulis, E. (2025). Defending the Status Quo or Seeking Change? Electoral Outcomes, Affective Polarization, and Support for Referendums. British Journal of Political Science, 55(e75).
Fahey, J. J., Allen, T. J., & Alarian, H. M. (2022). When Populists Win: How Right-Wing Populism Affects Democratic Satisfaction in the U.K. and Germany. Electoral Studies, 77.
Frateur, J., Bursens, P., Popelier, P., & Coroado, S. (2025). How to Explain Citizens’ Declined Political Trust During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Time-Series Qualitative Comparative Analysis (TsQCA). Comparative European Politics, 23, 552–575.
Fukuyama, F. (2019). Identity: Contemporary Identity Politics and the Struggle for Recognition. Profile Books.
Guillén, M. F. (2018). Symbolic Unity, Dynastic Continuity, and Countervailing Power: Monarchies, Republics, and the Economy. Social Forces, 97(2).
Gurri, M. (2018). The Revolt of the Public and the Crisis of Authority in the New Millennium. Stripe Press.
Hammoud-Gallego, O., Foa, R. S., & Romero-Vidal, X. (2025). News Cycles and Satisfaction With Democracy: How the Pandemic Short-Circuited Media Polarization. British Journal of Political Science, 55, 1–23.
Hansen, F. G. (2024). How Government Efficiency Shapes Political Trust: Evidence from the Case of Brexit. British Journal of Political Science, 54, 957–968.
Hassan, B. (2024). Workplace Democracy and Democratic Legitimacy in Europe. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 45(2), 389–414.
Houwelingen, P. van, & Dekker, P. (2021). Satisfaction with Democracy in Perspective: Anchoring Today By Looking Back and Forward. Polish Political Science Review, 9(1), 14–26.
Jabkowski, P., & Cichocki, P. (2025). Survey Response Rates in European Comparative Surveys: A 20-Year Decline Irrespective of Sampling Frames or Survey Modes. Quality & Quantity, 59.
Kostelka, F., Linek, L., Rovny, J., & Škvrňák, M. (2025). Electoral Participation and Satisfaction with Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe. Political Science Research and Methods, 1–21.
Lahusen, C. (2024). Trust and Distrust in Political Institutions: Conceptual and Theoretical Reassessments. Journal of Political Sociology, 2.
Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How Democracies Die. Crown Publishing.
Lijphart, A. (2012). Patterns of Democracy. Yale University Press.
Morales-Casetti, M., Bustos-Gutiérrez, M., Manquepillán-Calfuleo, F., & Hochstetter-Diez, J. (2024). Quality of Government, Democracy, and Well-Being as Determinants in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 16.
Muringani, J., Fitjar, R. D., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2024). Political Trust and Economic Development in European Regions. The Annals of Regional Science, 73.
Mußotter, M., & Rapp, C. H. (2025). Nationalism and Political Support: Longitudinal Evidence from The Netherlands. West European Politics.
Norris, P. (2011). Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge University Press.
Otjes, S., & Jonge, L. de. (2024). The Netherlands: Political Developments and Data in 2023. European Journal of Political Research, 63, 317–336.
Ouattara, E., & Steenvoorden, E. (2024). The Elusive Effect of Political Trust on Participation: Participatory Resource or (Dis)incentive? Political Studies, 72(4), 1269–1287.
Papp, Z., Navarro, J., Russo, F., & Nagy, L. E. (2024). Patterns of Democracy and Democratic Satisfaction: Results from a Comparative Conjoint Experiment. European Journal of Political Research, 63, 1445–1470.
Pellegata, A., & Memoli, V. (2018). Corruption and Satisfaction with Democracy: The Conditional Role of Electoral Disproportionality and Ballot Control. European Political Science Review, 1–24.
Placek, M. (2023). Social Media, Quality of Democracy, and Citizen Satisfaction with Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 21(1), 6–22.
Quaranta, M., & Martini, S. (2025). Winning Is the Only Thing: Election Outcomes, Satisfaction with Democracy and Political Trust Among Populist Voters in Europe. European Societies, 27(2), 235–262.
Robison, J. (2024). Explanation Giving Promotes Democratic Satisfaction Regardless of Respondent Partisanship. Political Behavior, 46, 2699–2721.
Schäfer, A., & Wenker, J. (2025). Losers’ Dissent: How Election Results Shape Populists’ Satisfaction with Democracy. Government and Opposition, 1–21.
Taylor, M. (2024). ‘Intelligible Government’: Rethinking the Meaning of Monarchy in the Age of King Charles III. History of European Ideas.
Verhoest, K., Latusek, D., Six, F., Maman, L., Papadopoulos, Y., Schomaker, R. M., & Trondal, J. (2024). Trust and Distrust in Public Governance Settings: Conceptualising and Testing the Link in Regulatory Relations. Journal of Trust Research, 14(2), 127–156.
Vigna, N. (2024). An Urban–Rural Divide of Political Discontent in Europe? Conflicting Results on Satisfaction with Democracy. European Political Science Review, 16, 596–611.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Zakky Zidan, Idris Hemay (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
An author who publishes in the Ganaya : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora agrees to the following terms:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.
