Efektivitas Perjanjian Perdagangan Bebas Indonesia Dalam Mengurangi Hambatan Perdagangan Serta Implikasinya terhadap Strategi Ekonomi Nasional

Authors

  • PM Erza Killian Universitas Brawijaya
  • Primadiana Yunita Universitas Brawijaya
  • Reza Triarda Universitas Brawijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37329/ganaya.v9i1.5060

Keywords:

Free Trade Agreements, Trade Barriers, FTA Utilization, Trade Policy.

Abstract

Indonesia has signed multiple Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) to expand market access. However, the utilization rate of preferential tariffs remains low, while non-tariff barriers and rules of origin (ROO) complexity persist. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of Indonesia’s FTAs in reducing trade barriers, explain the implementation factors that make their impacts partial, and draw implications for Indonesia’s national economic strategy. Using a qualitative policy case study approach, the research combines semi-structured online interviews with eight officials from the Ministry of Trade and document analysis of FTA texts, implementing regulations, technical reports, and trade data; validity is strengthened through source triangulation. The findings show that FTAs have lowered tariffs and expanded market coverage to roughly 70% of Indonesia’s exports, yet the benefits have not been translated evenly across firms. Preferential use particularly among MSMEs is constrained by ROO compliance costs, documentation and input traceability burdens, post-shipment verification concerns, and divergent technical standards and certification requirements. Moreover, rising sustainability and labor compliance demands increase compliance costs, leaving de facto barriers significant even when preferential tariffs are available. FTA proliferation also generates a noodle bowl effect through overlapping rules and procedures, prompting firms to choose MFN tariffs when preferential savings do not justify administrative costs. The study concludes that FTA effectiveness depends critically on regulatory harmonization, simplification of preferential procedures, strengthened MSME compliance capacity, and enhanced digital trade facilitation to ensure more inclusive and sustainable gains.

References

Anderson, J. E., & Wincoop, E. V. (2003). Gravity With Gravitas: A Solution To The Border Puzzle. American Economic Review, 93(1), 170-192.

Andiani, D. (2024). Impact Analysis Of Rules Of Origin On Indonesia Export Performance: Case Study On Indonesia Japan. Cendekia Niaga, 8(2), 134-145.

Baier, S. L., & Bergstrand, J. H. (2007). Do Free Trade Agreements Actually Increase Members’ International Trade?. Journal of International Economics, 71(1), 72-95.

Baldwin, R. E. (2008). Managing The Noodle Bowl: The Fragility Of East Asian Regionalism. The Singapore Economic Review, 53(3), 449-478.

Cadot, O., & Malouche, M. (2012). Non-Tariff Measures: A Fresh Look At Trade Policy’s New Frontier. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Elms, D. K. (2013). The Trans-Pacific Partnership: The Challenges Of Unraveling The Noodle Bowl. International Negotiation, 18(1), 25-50.

Gani, A. (2017). The Logistics Performance Effect In International Trade. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 33(4), 279-285.

Hayakawa, K., Laksanapanyakul, N., & Yoshimi, T. (2021). Utilization Of Free Trade Agreements In ASEAN. Asian Economic Journal, 35(3), 213-237.

Kawai, M., & Wignaraja, G. (2011). Asian FTAs: Trends, Prospects, And Challenges. Journal of Asian Economics, 22(1), 1-22.

Kee, H. L., Nicita, A., & Olarreaga, M. (2009). Estimating Trade Restrictiveness Indices. The Economic Journal, 119(534), 172-199.

Martí, L., Puertas, R., & García, L. (2014). The Importance Of The Logistics Performance Index In International Trade. Applied Economics, 46(24), 2982-2992.

Menon, J. (2014). Trade Agreements: New Approaches To The Noodle Bowl. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 1(3), 470-483.

Menon, J. (2016). Trade Multilateralization And The Need For Policy Harmonization In Asia. Asian Development Review, 33(2), 42-58.

Nasution, N. A., & Verico, K. (2019). Utilization Of Free Trade Agreement In Indonesia: Firm-Level Data Analysis Of The Yogyakarta Special Region. Economics and Finance in Indonesia, 65(2), 169-186.

Ningsih, C. (2018). Pemanfaatan Kerja Sama Indonesia-Jepang Economic Partnership Agreement (IJEPA) dan Indonesia-Pakistan Preferential Trade Agreement (IPPTA). Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan, 12(2), 189-214.

Patunru, A. A. (2023). Trade Policy In Indonesia: Between Ambivalence, Pragmatism And Nationalism. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 59(3), 285-307.

Petri, P. A., & Plummer, M. G. (2021). The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership: A New Era Of Economic Integration In Asia. Journal of Asian Economics (JRIME), 3(3), 85-93.

Portugal-Perez, A., & Wilson, J. S. (2012). Export Performance And Trade Facilitation Reform: Hard And Soft Infrastructure. World Development, 40(7), 1295-1307.

Revindo, M. D. (2017). Export Barriers And Exporter Behavior: Evidence From Indonesia. Economics and Finance in Indonesia, 63(2), 97-123.

Tambunan, T. T. H. (2024). Micro And Small Enterprises’ Export Competencies And Export Engagement In Indonesia. Journal of Developing Economies, 26(2), 73-96.

Tinbergen, J. (1962). Shaping The World Economy: Suggestions For An International Economic Policy. New York, NY: The Twentieth Century Fund.

Urata, S., & Okabe, M. (2020). The Impact Of Free Trade Agreements On Trade Flows: Evidence from Asia. Journal of Asian Economics, 68, 101234.

Yuliati, L. N., Komariyah, S., & Ayu, D. (2023). Analysis Of Implementation Indonesia-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (IJEPA) Toward Export Value Growth In Indonesia. Jurnal Economia, 19(1), 25-37.

Downloads

Published

11-02-2026

How to Cite

Killian, P. E., Yunita, P., & Triarda, R. (2026). Efektivitas Perjanjian Perdagangan Bebas Indonesia Dalam Mengurangi Hambatan Perdagangan Serta Implikasinya terhadap Strategi Ekonomi Nasional. Ganaya : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 9(1), 365–373. https://doi.org/10.37329/ganaya.v9i1.5060

Issue

Section

Articles