Political Will Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Bogor Dalam Memberantas Budaya Pungli Uji KIR

Authors

  • Aldaffa Malik Hindarsyah Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta
  • Ridwan Ridwan Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37329/ganaya.v8i4.4997

Keywords:

Political Will, Reformasi Birokasi, Pungutan Liar, Uji KIR

Abstract

The phenomenon of illegal levies (pungli) remains a persistent issue in Indonesia’s public service delivery, including in the vehicle roadworthiness testing process (Uji KIR). Despite more than two decades of bureaucratic reform, such practices continue to occur and are often perceived as “unofficial fees” to expedite services. This study aims to analyze the political will of the Bogor Regency Government in eradicating the culture of pungli within the Uji KIR process through three main dimensions: political commitment, policy choices, and institutional actions. This research employs a descriptive qualitative approach, utilizing primary data collected through in-depth interviews with the Regional Secretary of Bogor Regency, the Head of the Motor Vehicle Testing Division at the Department of Transportation, and a public policy analyst. Secondary data were obtained from regulations, official government reports, and academic literature. Data analysis was conducted using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña (2014), which includes data reduction, presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results indicate that the local government’s political will remains suboptimal. Political commitment is still normative, digitalization of services has not effectively closed bureaucratic loopholes, and internal supervision remains weak. The study concludes that eradicating pungli requires sustained political will through policy transparency, institutional reform, and enhanced public participation in oversight. 

References

Alfaridzi, M., et al. (2023). Fenomena Pungutan Liar Dalam Pelayanan Publik. Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 15(2), 77–91.

Arsita, D. (2020). Pengaruh Ethical Leadership, Reward dan Punishment Terhadap Kedisiplinan Dengan Kepuasan Kerja Sebagai Variabel Intervening (Studi Pada Guru SMK Bina Karya 1 Karanganyar) (Disertasi Doktor, Universitas Putra Bangsa).

Brinkerhoff, D. W. (2010). Political Will and Reform: The Keys to Good Governance. Public Administration and Development, 30(3), 239–249. Sarajevo University.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Dwiyanto, A. (2021). Mewujudkan Good Governance Melalui Pelayanan Publik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Farchan, Y. (2022). Dinamika Sistem Politik Otoritarianisme Orde Baru. Jurnal Adhikari, 1(3), 152–161.

Ferizaldi, F. (2020). Korupsi dan Pungutan Liar Dalam Perspektif Etika Pelayanan Publik. Jurnal Integritas, 6(1), 45–60.

Hafiz, F., & Hamidah, R. (2025). Corruption and the Culture of Illegal Levies: An Analysis of the Phenomenon in Indonesia’s Public Service Sector (Korupsi dan Budaya Pungutan Liar: Analisis Fenomena Pada Sektor Pelayanan Publik Indonesia). Journal of Global Corruption, 1(1), 1–15.

Iswara, A. M. (2023). Serba-Serbi Pungutan Liar Dalam Tinjauan Yuridis. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Johnston, M. (2014). Corruption, Contention and Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Klitgaard, R. (2015). Addressing Corruption Together. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Mahmud, A. (2024). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pungutan Liar Oleh Oknum Organisasi Masyarakat di Buleleng. Jurnal Hukum dan Kebijakan Publik, 12(1), 66–79.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Monica, R. (2021). Political Will Pemerintah Kota Pekanbaru. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 7(1), 33–47.

Nazurah, S. (2021). Political Will Pemerintah Kota Dumai. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 9(2), 112–125.

Novita, D. (2019). Analisis Kinerja Inspektorat Daerah Dalam Melakukan Fungsi Pengawasan (Studi Pada Inspektorat Kota Langsa). Universitas Medan Area

Peters, M. A. (2018). Technological Innovation and the Future of Humanity: Ethics, Policy, and Education. Singapore: Springer.

Rose-Ackerman, S. (2016). Corruption and Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Salipu, M. (2023). Dampak Pungutan Liar Terhadap Ekonomi. Jurnal Pembangunan Nasional, 18(3), 201–216.

Setiyono, B., & McLeod, R. H. (2010). Civil Society Organisations’ Contribution to the Anti-Corruption Movement in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 46(3), 331–357.

Subekti, A. (2018). Regulasi Uji Kelayakan Kendaraan Bermotor di Indonesia. Jurnal Transportasi, 10(2), 90–101.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2020). Governance and Anti-Corruption Strategies in Developing Countries. New York: UNDP.

Downloads

Published

06-11-2025

How to Cite

Hindarsyah, A. M., & Ridwan, R. (2025). Political Will Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Bogor Dalam Memberantas Budaya Pungli Uji KIR. Ganaya : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 8(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.37329/ganaya.v8i4.4997