Analisis Permendkbudristek No. 46 Tahun 2023 Terhadap Kekerasan Struktural Yang Terjadi Pada Aliran Kepercayaan Sapto Darmo Di Kabupaten Kendal

Authors

  • Nahar Surur Universitas Selamat Sri
  • Atik Dina Nasikhah Universitas Selamat Sri
  • Ego Setyawan Universitas Selamat Sri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37329/ganaya.v7i4.3488

Keywords:

Sapto Darmo Belief, Structural Violence, Legal Protection, Policy Implementation

Abstract

Findings of structural violence in the world of education continue to occur today. One type of structural violence that often occurs in the educational environment is educational discrimination against minorities. Cases of educational discrimination were also experienced by the Sapto Darmo sect of faith in Kendal Regency, some of whom experienced difficulties in obtaining formal education. In fact, Kendal is one of the districts in Central Java Province which has 5 developing religious beliefs, one of which is the Sapto Darmo Belief. The purpose of this research is to find out whether Permendikbudristek Regulation No. 46 of 2023 can be used as a legal umbrella for adherents of the Sapto Darmo belief in Kendal Regency or whether this regulation is just a formality. The method used in this research is analyzing the policy results of Minister of Education and Culture Regulation No. 46 of 2023 on the Sapto Darmo belief sect in Kendal Regency using empirical juridical analysis. In particular, this research is targeted to be a reference source for the Kendal Regency Government in providing equal educational rights for adherents of the Sapto Darmo belief system. The results of this research show that Permendikbudristek No. 46 of 2023 has been implemented well for students who adhere to existing beliefs in Kendal Regency, especially the Sapto Darmo belief sect. The conclusion of this research is that the violence that was previously feared would befall religious students in Kendal Regency has gradually improved and there are no longer any reports of schools prohibiting religious students from entering school. If in the future there are still schools that prohibit this, the Kendal Regency Government and the Kendal Regency Education and Culture Office will seek mediation and legal action.

References

Ali, Z. (2006). Filsafat Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika Offset.

Anggraeni, E. J. (2023). Analisis Permendikbud Ristek Nomor 30 Tahun 2021 Terhadap Fenomena Kekerasan Seksual Di Lingkungan Perguruan Tinggi. Wicarana, 2(2), 118-126.

Ardianto, M. M. (2024). Penguatan Identitas dan Strategi Penyebaran Ajaran Penghayat Kepercayaan Sapta Darma Yogyakarta. Jurnal Inen Paer, 35-55.

Arroisi, J., Badi, S., Perdana, M. P., & Mafaza, A. T. (2021). Problematika Aliran Kepercayaan dan Kebatinan sebagai Agama Asli Indonesia. Fikri: Jurnal Kajian Agama, Sosial Dan Budaya, 6(2), 138-155.

Black, M. (1954). Chritical Thingking: An Introduction to Logic and Scientific Method. New York: Prentice- Hall.

Djaenab, D. (2018). Efektifitas Dan Berfungsinya Hukum Dalam Masyarakat. Ash-Shahabah: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Studi Islam, 4(2), 148-153.

Gardanita, G. I. (2020). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Identitas Penghayat Kepercayaan Pada Kolom Agama Ktp Elektronik (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 97/Puu-Xiv/2016). Novum: Jurnal Hukum, 7(1).

Hasibuan, H. H. (2019). Moderasi Islam Pencantuman Penghayat Kepercayaan di Kolom KTP/KK dalam Nalar Maqasid. Aqlam: Journal of Islam and Plurality, 4(2).

Karmila, K., Fauziah, N., Safira, E., Sadikin, M. N. A., & Wardhana, K. E. (2021). Diskriminasi Pendidikan Di Indonesia. Educasia: Jurnal Pendidikan, Pengajaran, Dan Pembelajaran, 6(3), 191-203.

Kasmad, R. (2018). Studi Implementasi Kebijakan Publik. Makassar: Kedai Aksara.

Liere, L. V. (2010). Menghancurkan Belenggu Kekerasan: Teologi dan Etika Kristen di Tengah Tantangan Globalisasi dan Terorisme. Jakarta: Gunung Mulia.

Marzali, A. (2016). Agama dan kebudayaan. Umbara: Indonesian Journal of Anthropology, 1 (1), 57–75.

Murniati, A. N. (2004). Getar Gender: Buku Kedua. Magelang: IndonesiaTera.

Pradana, T. M. (2018). Penerapan Putusan MK Tentang Pengakuan Aliran Kepercayaan di Indonesia Demi Mewujudkan SDG'S 2030 Poin 16 )Peace, Justicem and Strong Institution) Studi Kasus di Desa Cening, Kecamatan Singorojo, Kabupaten Kendal, Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Lex Scientia Law, 79-92.

Rosyid, M., & Kushidayati, L. (2020). Pelayanan Pendidikan Penghayat Sapta Darma Di Sekolah Formal: Studi Kasus Di Kudus. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 8(1), 81-97.

Shalihah, F. (2017). Sosioloigi Hukum. Jakarta: Grafindo Persada.

Soekanto, S. (1985). Sosiologi Hukum dalam Masyarakat. Jakarta: Rajawali.

Trinugraha, Y. H., Saputro, R., & Yuhastina, Y. (2023). Proses Stigmatisasi Pada Pengikut Penghayat Kepercayaan Pelajar Kawruh Jiwo di Kota Surakarta: Kajian teori Stigma Erving Goffmap. Sosiohumaniora: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 9(1), 93-111.

Faj'jrina, F. S. N., & Wibawani, S. (2024). Implementasi Kebijakan Parkir Berlangganan di Kabupaten Tuban. Ganaya: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 7(3), 182-189.

Downloads

Published

03-08-2024

How to Cite

Surur, N. ., Nasikhah, A. D. ., & Setyawan, E. (2024). Analisis Permendkbudristek No. 46 Tahun 2023 Terhadap Kekerasan Struktural Yang Terjadi Pada Aliran Kepercayaan Sapto Darmo Di Kabupaten Kendal. Ganaya : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 7(4), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.37329/ganaya.v7i4.3488

Issue

Section

Articles