Systematic Literature Review Dan Analisis Bibliometrik Pengaruh Work From Home (WFH) Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Karyawan

Authors

  • Andika Wulan Febriani Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Budi Eko Soetjipto Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Madziatul Churiyah Universitas Negeri Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37329/ganaya.v6i3.2402

Keywords:

Systematic Literature Review, Bibliometric Analysis, Work From Home, Employee Work Productivity

Abstract

This literature study focuses on work from home and employee productivity. The strategy used is using the SLR as an instrument for searching research data, then bibliometric literature as a data processor which is analyzed by the VOSviewer software. VOSviewer software analysis techniques are used to analyze articles that have been collected through the Scopus database which are taken as researchers' references. The findings of these articles were referenced from 2013 to 2023 with a total of 547 articles, and only 161 articles were analyzed. Then the scientists continued to clarify the description of the results by using the VOSviewer software in examining co-authorship, co-accurance and citation. This literature study, in totality, presents a more accurate bibliographical objective for future researchers according to the themes discussed. Work from home (WFH) is a work process that is flexible and automatic and provides flexibility for employees to work using telecommuting, teleworking and remote work by utilizing modern digital technology tools as a bridge to work. Work from home (WFH) can be done by all men and women, from 25 to 60 years old. Working flexibly in the "New Normal" focuses on employee work productivity in the potential to work from home more towards working in a work life balance (WLB) which aims to balance work responsibilities and balance life time so as to reduce emotional fatigue from work stress, impact on performance satisfaction whose results affect the size of the wage/salary by obtaining work rewards from the company.

 

References

Afrianty, T. W., Artatanaya, I. G., & Burgess, J. (2022). Working from home effectiveness during Covid-19: Evidence from university staff in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Management Review, 27(1), 50–57.

Ågren, P., Knoph, E., & Berntsson Svensson, R. (2022). Agile software development one year into the COVID-19 pandemic. Empirical Software Engineering, 27(6), 121.

Akindele, A. T., Arulogun, O. T., Taye, G. T., Amare, S. Y., Van Reisen, M., Berhe, K. F., & Gusite, B. (2022). The Impact of COVID-19 and FAIR Data Innovation on Distance Education in Africa. Data Intelligence, 4(4), 1013–1032.

Al-Habaibeh, A., Watkins, M., Waried, K., & Javareshk, M. B. (2021). Challenges and opportunities of remotely working from home during Covid-19 pandemic. Global Transitions, 3, 99–108.

Andargie, M. S., Touchie, M., & O’Brien, W. (2021). Case study: A survey of perceived noise in Canadian multi-unit residential buildings to study long-term implications for widespread teleworking. Building Acoustics, 28(4), 443–460.

Aufegger, L., Elliott-Deflo, N., & Nichols, T. (2022). Workspace and Productivity: Guidelines for Virtual Reality Workplace Design and Optimization. Applied Sciences, 12(15), 7393.

Aum, S., Lee, S. Y. (Tim), & Shin, Y. (2021). Inequality of fear and self-quarantine: Is there a trade-off between GDP and public health? Journal of Public Economics, 194, 104354.

Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377–386.

Babu, D., Ramalho, N., & Falcao, P. F. (2020). Telecommuting potential analysis. Global Business and Economics Review, 23(1), 100.

Bao, L., Li, T., Xia, X., Zhu, K., Li, H., & Yang, X. (2022). How does working from home affect developer productivity? — A case study of Baidu during the COVID-19 pandemic. Science China Information Sciences, 65(4), 142102.

Baqaee.D. & Farhi.E, (2021) Supply And Demand In Disaggregated Keynesian Economies With An Application To The Covid-19 Crisis. NBER Working Paper No. 27152.

Beňo, M. (2021). The Advantages and Disadvantages of E-working: An Examination using an ALDINE Analysis. Emerging Science Journal, 5, 11–20.

Bezak, E., Carson-Chahhoud, K. V., Marcu, L. G., Stoeva, M., Lhotska, L., Barabino, G. A., Ibrahim, F., Kaldoudi, E., Lim, S., Marques da Silva, A. M., Tan, P. H., Tsapaki, V., & Frize, M. (2022). The Biggest Challenges Resulting from the COVID-19 Pandemic on Gender-Related Work from Home in Biomedical Fields—World-Wide Qualitative Survey Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(5), 3109.

Bintang Narpati, Indra Lubis, Kardinah Indriana Meutia, & Endah Prawesti Ningrum. (2021). Produktivitas Kerja Pegawai yang Dipengaruhi oleh Work From Home (WFH) dan Lingkungan Kerja Selama Masa Pandemi. JIMF (Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Forkamma), 4 (1), 121–133.

Błaszczyk, M., Popović, M., Zajdel, K., & Zajdel, R. (2022). The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Organisation of Remote Work in IT Companies. Sustainability, 14(20), 13373.

Bose, S. (2023). The penalty of work from home: Gender gap in productivity of unorganised manufacturing firms in India. Small Business Economics, 60(1), 351–369.

Brooks, S. K., Hall, C. E., Patel, D., & Greenberg, N. (2022). “In the office nine to five, five days a week… those days are gone”: Qualitative exploration of diplomatic personnel’s experiences of remote working during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Psychology, 10(1), 272.

Chu, A. M. Y., Chan, T. W. C., & So, M. K. P. (2022). Learning from work-from-home issues during the COVID-19 pandemic: Balance speaks louder than words. PLOS ONE, 17(1), e0261969.

Cui, R., Ding, H., & Zhu, F. (2022). Gender Inequality in Research Productivity During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 24(2), 707–726.

Deole, S. S., Deter, M., & Huang, Y. (2023). Home sweet home: Working from home and employee performance during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK. Labour Economics, 80, 102295.

Dingel, J. I., & Neiman, B. (2020). How many jobs can be done at home? Journal of Public Economics, 189, 104235.

Dixit, R., Chinnam, R. B., & Singh, H. (2020). Decision-Making Dynamics in the Defense Industry During Work From Home Circumstances. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 48(3), 44–54.

Farrell, K. (2017). Working from Home: A Double-Edged Sword.

Galanti, T., Guidetti, G., Mazzei, E., Zappalà, S., & Toscano, F. (2021). Work from Home during the COVID-19 Outbreak: The Impact on Employees’ Remote Work Productivity, Engagement and Stress. Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, Publish Ahead of Print.

Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2015). Lean and green – a systematic review of the state of the art literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 102, 18–29.

George, T. J., Atwater, L. E., Maneethai, D., & Madera, J. M. (2022). Supporting the productivity and wellbeing of remote workers. Organizational Dynamics, 51(2), 100869.

Goldenberg, I., Denomme, W. J., & Lee, J. E. C. (2022). Pandemic-Related Challenges and Organizational Support Among Personnel in Canada’s Defense Establishment. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 789912.

Innstrand, S. T., Christensen, M., Grødal, K., & Banks, C. (2022). Within- and between-person changes in work practice and experiences due to COVID-19: Lessons learned from employees working from home, hybrid working, and working at the office. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 948516.

Islam, A. (2022). Work-from/at/for-home: CoVID-19 and the future of work – A critical review. Geoforum, 128, 33–36.

Kamir, D., Gavrielov, N., & Berkowitz, C. (2022). Home office – Yay or nay? Medical Writing, 31(3), 24–27.

Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/Bappenas, & Mungkasa, O. (2020). Bekerja dari Rumah (Working From Home/WFH): Menuju Tatanan Baru Era Pandemi COVID 19. Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning, 4(2), 126–150.

Kowalski, K. B., Aruldoss, A., Gurumurthy, B., & Parayitam, S. (2022). Work-From-Home Productivity and Job Satisfaction: A Double-Layered Moderated Mediation Model. Sustainability, 14(18), 11179.

Mongey, S., Pilossoph, L., & Weinberg, A. (2020). Which Workers Bear the Burden of Social Distancing? (No. w27085; p. w27085). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Nur, M., Hamidah*, I., Permanasari, A., Gafar, A., Rachman, I., & Matsumoto, T. (2020). Low Carbon Education: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 319–329.

Oksa, R., Pirkkalainen, H., Salo, M., Savela, N., & Oksanen, A. (2022). Professional social media-enabled productivity: A five-wave longitudinal study on the role of professional social media invasion, work engagement and work exhaustion. Information Technology & People, 35(8), 349–368.

Rafiq, R., McNally, M. G., Sarwar Uddin, Y., & Ahmed, T. (2022). Impact of working from home on activity-travel behavior during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An aggregate structural analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 159, 35–54.

Raišienė, A. G., Rapuano, V., & Varkulevičiūtė, K. (2021). Sensitive Men and Hardy Women: How Do Millennials, Xennials and Gen X Manage to Work from Home? Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(2), 106.

Ralph, P., Baltes, S., Adisaputri, G., Torkar, R., Kovalenko, V., Kalinowski, M., Novielli, N., Yoo, S., Devroey, X., Tan, X., Zhou, M., Turhan, B., Hoda, R., Hata, H., Robles, G., Milani Fard, A., & Alkadhi, R. (2020). Pandemic programming: How COVID-19 affects software developers and how their organizations can help. Empirical Software Engineering, 25(6), 4927–4961.

Rejeb, A., Rejeb, K., Abdollahi, A., & Treiblmaier, H. (2022). The big picture on Instagram research: Insights from a bibliometric analysis. Telematics and Informatics, 73, 101876.

Saurombe, M. D., Rayners, S. S., Mokgobu, K. A., & Manka, K. (2022). The perceived influence of remote working on specific human resource management outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 20.

Setyaningsih, I., Indarti, N., & Jie, F. (2018). Bibliometric analysis of the term “green manufacturing.” International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 11(3), 315.

Seva, R. R., Tejero, L. M. S., & Fadrilan‐Camacho, V. F. F. (2021). Barriers and facilitators of productivity while working from home during pandemic. Journal of Occupational Health, 63(1).

Shimura, A., Yokoi, K., Ishibashi, Y., Akatsuka, Y., & Inoue, T. (2021). Remote Work Decreases Psychological and Physical Stress Responses, but Full-Remote Work Increases Presenteeism. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 730969.

Tahlyan, D., Said, M., Mahmassani, H., Stathopoulos, A., Walker, J., & Shaheen, S. (2022). For whom did telework not work during the Pandemic? Understanding the factors impacting telework satisfaction in the US using a multiple indicator multiple cause (MIMIC) model. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 155, 387–402.

Toscano, F., & Zappalà, S. (2020). Social Isolation and Stress as Predictors of Productivity Perception and Remote Work Satisfaction during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Concern about the Virus in a Moderated Double Mediation. Sustainability, 12(23), 9804.

Toscano, F., & Zappalà, S. (2021). Overall Job Performance, Remote Work Engagement, Living With Children, and Remote Work Productivity During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mediated Moderation Model. European Journal of Psychology Open, 80(3), 133–142.

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222.

Vaddadi, B., Ringenson, T., Sjöman, M., Hesselgren, M., & Kramers, A. (2022). Do they work? Exploring possible potentials of neighbourhood Telecommuting centres in supporting sustainable travel. Travel Behaviour and Society, 29, 34–41.

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538.

Vinueza-Cabezas, A., Osejo-Taco, G., Unda-López, A., Paz, C., & Hidalgo-Andrade, P. (2022). A Comparison of Working Conditions and Workers’ Perceptions among On-Site, Telework, and Hybrid Workers in Ecuador during the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), 14337.

Veronica Guerrieri, et, all, (2020). Macroeconomic Implications Of Covid-19: Can Negative Supply Shocks Cause Demand Shortages?. Nber Working Paper No. 26918 April 2020 JEL No. E21,E32,E60,I18.

Weitzer, J., Papantoniou, K., Seidel, S., Klösch, G., Caniglia, G., Laubichler, M., Bertau, M., Birmann, B. M., Jäger, C. C., Zenk, L., Steiner, G., & Schernhammer, E. (2021). Working from home, quality of life, and perceived productivity during the first 50-day COVID-19 mitigation measures in Austria: A cross-sectional study. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 94(8), 1823–1837.

Wulan Febriani, A., & Churiyah, M. (2022). Homework for New Changes in The Future: A Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Business and Management Review, 3(5), 429–447.

Downloads

Published

02-07-2023

How to Cite

Wulan Febriani, A., Soetjipto, B. E. ., & Churiyah, M. . (2023). Systematic Literature Review Dan Analisis Bibliometrik Pengaruh Work From Home (WFH) Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Karyawan. Ganaya : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 6(3), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.37329/ganaya.v6i3.2402

Issue

Section

Articles