Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Abortus Akibat Pemerkosaan Menurut Hukum Pidana Dan Hukum Kesehatan

Authors

  • Sofyan Rauf Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lakidende Unaaha

Abstract

Comparison of Accountability in Murder Against the Law of Abortus Provocatus Due to Rape in Court Law and Health Law It is necessary to consider the legal instruments contained in Law Number 1 of 1946 concerning the Criminal Code, then the Provocatus Abortion Act is justified in the Criminal Code Submitting Article 48 of the Criminal Code concerning forced power. Article 75 of Law Number 36 of 2009 concerning Health provides normative space for the implementation of Abortus Provocatus due to reasons for medical change and rape with conditions set out in Article 76 of Law Number 36 Year 2009 which reads Before being responded to 6 (six) weeks.

References

Agus Yudha Hernoko, Metode Penelitian Hukum, hlm. 37.
Andi Hamzah, 2005. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. PT. Yarsif Watampone, Jakarta.
Andi Zainal Abidin Farid, 1981. Azas-Azas Hukum Pidana. Djambatan, Jakarta
Barda Nawawi Arief. 2013. Perbandingan Hukum Pidana. Edisi Revisi 10. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta
Hari Sasangka, Lily Rosita, 2003. Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Perkara Pidana, Mandar Maju, Bandung.
Joko Subagyo, 2006. Metode Penelitian Dalam Teori Dan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
M. Marwan, SH & Jimmy P, SH. 2009. Kamus Hukum (Dictionary Of Law Complete Edision). Reality Publisher.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2010. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana

Downloads

Published

31-03-2019

How to Cite

Rauf, S. (2019). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Abortus Akibat Pemerkosaan Menurut Hukum Pidana Dan Hukum Kesehatan. Ganaya : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 2(1), 161–167. Retrieved from https://jayapanguspress.penerbit.org/index.php/ganaya/article/view/183

Issue

Section

Articles