Fungsi Dan Makna Kain Adat Tolaki Di Kota Kendari

Authors

  • Iinfantri Wahid Universitas Lakidende
  • Evang Asmawati Universitas Lakidende

Abstract

The formulation of the research problem is 1) What is the meaning contained in the form and motif and appearance of traditional cloth (weaving) in the Tolaki culture in Kendari City ?, and 2) What is the function and value of traditional cloth in Tolaki culture in Kendari City?

The method used in this study is a descriptive qualitative method to provide an explanation of the function and meaning of Tolaki traditional cloth in Kendari City. Data obtained through direct interviews with research informants related to the function and meaning of Tolaki traditional cloth in Kendari City

The results of the study found that the meaning contained in the culture and motifs and appearance of traditional cloth (weaving) in Tolaki culture in Kendari City were a) Wulele sanggula which meant defense sources, the good name of the country, the determination of leaders, prosperity of the people and justice / holiness. b) Pinelawa means the prosperity of the people, the main source of people's power in administering the government, c) Pinesewi or an alternative motive that means preserving the culture of the country's customs, d) Pineburu mbako which has continuous meaning, order and peace of the country and society, e) Pinetawawako which means protection. protect families and support the administration of government, and f) Penetobo which means courage. the husband's inspirers with oval trapezoidal motifs and sharp ends. While the function and value of traditional fabrics in Tolaki culture in Kendari City are as follows: a) As a dress used in dance dances at parties and life and traditional ceremonies. b) As a means of appreciation and giving to guests visiting the Tolaki area. c) As a means of valuing and giving in certain events and d) As a myth. tribal symbols are glorified because certain designs have their own meaning or meaning in the view of society.

References

Admajadja, 2000. Masyarakat Budaya. Jakarta: Rosdakarya.
Alwi, 1995. Kamus Besar Bahasan Indonesia. Jakarta. Tiga Serangkai
Arianto, 2000. Fungsionalisme Dalam Organisasi Modern. Jakarta. Ghalia Ilmu. Jakarta.
Arifin. 2007. Komunikasi Budaya. Bandung. Remaja Rosdakarya
Asnawati, 2012. Motif Daerah dan Kain Songket Sulawesi Tenggara. Kendari. Tidak Dipublikasikan.
Authi Max, 1997. Fungionalisme. Jakarta. Rajawali Press.
Baroroh, B., dkk. 1983. Pengantar Teori Filologi. Yogyakarta: Depdikbud.
Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). Data Keadaan Penduduk Sulawesi Tenggara. 2012. Diunduh tanggal 7 Februari dari http://sultra.bps.go.id
Cangara. Hafied. H. 1998, Pengantar Ilmu Komunikasi, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta
Endaswara, 2008. Psikologi Budaya. Jakarta. Ghalia Ilmu.
Fattah. 2003. Komunikasi Lintas Budaya. Rajawali Press : Jakarta
Garna, 2006. Implementasi Seni Tenun Sebagai Warisan Budaya. Tulung Agung. Semarang.Tesis Undip.
Gardiman, 2000. Mitos dan Kebudayan. Jakarta. Bina Aksara.
Geertz, C. 1992. Tafsir Kebudayaan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Hariana, 2007. Perubahan Bentuk, Estetik dan Makna Simbolik Pakaian Adat Perkawinan Suku Tolaki. Kendari. Skripsi Unhalu.
Harsojo, 1997. Teori Budaya: Salemba Empat Jakarta
Hartoko, 1984. Komunikasi Non Verbal. Bandung. Alfabeta.
Ihromi. 2000. Antopologi dan Kajian Budaya. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Kartapradja. 1985. Pembangunan Masyarakat dan Budaya, Pespektif Sosial Kemasyarakatan. Jakarta: Ghalian Indonesia.
Koentjaraningrat. 1985. Kebudayaan Mentalitas dan Pembangunan. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.
_________. 1995. Pengantar Ilmu Antropologi. Jakarta: Aksara Baru.
Kridalaksana, 1984. Kebudayaan Daerah. Jakarta. Rajawali Press.
Kusumarini, 2006. Pendidikan Sosiologi. Jakarta. Salemba Empat.
Mansoer Pateda, 2001. Industri Kerajinan Tenun. Yogyakarta: Pudiklat Kerajinan Nasional RI.
Maryanski, 1998. Pengantar Antropologi. Jakarta. Bina Aksara.
Miles dan Huberman, 2007. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta.
Mulyana, 2002. Kekuatan Simbol Dalam Budaya Daerah. Jakarta. Indografika.
Patasik, 2007. Kebudayaan Daerah. Erlangga. Jakarta
Mubarok 1997. Nilai-Nilai Budaya Dalam Kehidupan Masyarakat. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Peursen, V.C.A. 1994. Strategi Kebudayaan, Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Rosidi, A. 2010. Masa Depan Budaya Daerah. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.
Rucky, 2001. Model-Model Simbol Budaya Masyarakat Primitif. Jakarta. Airlangga.
Santosa, 2003. Komunikasi Budaya. Jakarta. Paramadya Kencana.
Siregar. 2002. Antropologi Konsep Kebudayaan Antropologi Papua Volume I Nomor 1, Agustus 2002.
Sobur, 2006. Komunikasi. Jakarta. Bhuana Ilmu Populer.
Soekanto. 1998. Kebudayaan Nasional dan Perspektif Budaya. Jakarta: Ghalia Ilmu.
Sugandi, 2005. Pesona Kebaya dan Kain Songket. Jakarta Murai Kencana.
Sumitro, 1995. Manusia dan Kebudayaan. Jakarta. Gunung Agung.
Sumovar, 2010. Pengantar Antropologi. Bandung. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Suriyanti, 2004. Penggunaan Simbol-Simbol Budaya Dalam Kain Adat. Yogyakarta. Andi.
Susan. Bolyard Millar, 2009. Perkawinan Adat Tolaki. Kendari. Skripsi Unhalu/
Sutrisno, M. dan Putranto, H. (ed). 2005. Teori-teori Kebudayaan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Syahrir. 2005. Komunikasi dan Kebudayaan. Jakarta. Rajawali Press.
Taalami dan Tina., A., N. 2012. Motif Daerah, Ragam Hias Sulawesi Tenggara. Kendari: Tidak Dipulikasikan.
Tarimana. A, 1993. Kebudayaan Tolaki. Balai Pustaka. Jakarta
Trianto, 2008. Pengembangan Kebudayan Nasional. Jakarta. Bhuana Ilmu Populer.
Turner, J. H. dan Mayanski, A. 1979. Fungsionalism (Terjemahan). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Usman, 2008. Komunikasi Antarbudaya. Bandung. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Wiryaatmadja, 1997. Toeri Simbolik. Jakarta. Murai Kencana.

Downloads

Published

28-09-2018

How to Cite

Wahid, I., & Asmawati, E. (2018). Fungsi Dan Makna Kain Adat Tolaki Di Kota Kendari. Ganaya : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 1(2), 284–296. Retrieved from https://jayapanguspress.penerbit.org/index.php/ganaya/article/view/104

Issue

Section

Articles