The Implementation of Diagnostik Assessment in Geography Education Within the Merdeka Curriculum

Authors

  • Fendya Jauhari Budi Arinto Universitas PGRI Semarang
  • Rosalina Br Ginting Universitas PGRI Semarang
  • Endang Wuryandini Universitas PGRI Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37329/cetta.v8i3.4283

Keywords:

Diagnostic Assessment, Merdeka Curriculum, Geography Education

Abstract

This study explores the implementation of diagnostic assessment in Geography education within the Merdeka Curriculum framework at SMA Negeri 1 Blora. Diagnostic assessment serves to identify students' prior knowledge, enabling teachers to tailor instruction and design personalized strategies aligned with curriculum goals. Employing a descriptive qualitative case study approach, data were collected through interviews with teachers and students, classroom observations, and document analysis. Findings reveal that diagnostic assessment is conducted in three stages planning, implementation, and follow-up. During planning, teachers prepare assessment tools aligned with curriculum objectives. Implementation occurs before new topics to gauge students' baseline knowledge, while follow-up involves adjusting teaching methods based on assessment results to address learning gaps. Challenges include limited time and difficulty in developing comprehensive, accurate questions. Despite these, diagnostic assessment enhances students’ Geography understanding and improves education quality under the Merdeka Curriculum. The study emphasizes its role in fostering a student-centered learning environment.

References

Anggraena, Y. (2023). Perencanaan Asesmen Dalam Kurikulum Merdeka Di Sekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan, 3(2), 3-12.

Amelia, N. (2021). Diagnostic Assessments Provide Vital Feedback That Guides Teachers In Making Informed Decisions About Curriculum Adjustments And Teaching Techniques. Journal of Educational Assessment, 15(3).

Ardiansyah, A. (2023). Implementasi Asesmen Diagnostik Dalam Pembelajaran Diferensiasi. Pustaka Pendidikan.

Brown, H. D. (2019). Principles Of Language Learning And Teaching. Singapura: Pearson Education.

Creswell, J. W. (2023). Qualitative Research & Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

Csapo, G., & Molnar, A. (2019). The Importance Of Diagnostic Assessment In Educational Contexts. International Journal of Education, 43(1), 11-22.

Harahap, M., & Marwoto, P. (2020). A Well-Structured Diagnostic Assessment Strategy Helps In Creating A Learning Environment That Is Both Inclusive And Responsive To Students' Needs. Educational Insights Journal, 33(2).

Haryanto, I. (2019). One Of The Main Benefits Of Diagnostic Assessments Is Their Ability To Guide Instructional Planning By Providing Detailed Insights Into Students' Learning Gaps. Indonesian Journal of Education, 18(1).

Kizi, A., & Shadjalilovna, F. (2022). Peran Asesmen Diagnostik Dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 20(4), 35-45.

Kusnadi, M. (2020). Diagnostic Assessments Play A Crucial Role In Identifying Gaps In Students’ Understanding, Which Can Be Used To Adjust Teaching Methods And Content Delivery. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 13(2).

Magistra, R. (2023). Asesmen Diagnostik Dalam Pendidikan: Teori Dan Praktik. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Maryani, A. (2023). Penerapan Asesmen Diagnostik Dalam Pembelajaran Geografi Di Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Geografi, 15(2), 6-12.

Maryani, A., Hasanah, D., & Suyatno, R. (2023). Perencanaan Asesmen Diagnostik Dalam Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(3), 15-19.

Moleong, L. J. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Purnomo, A., & Aji, B. (2020). Training Teachers To Design And Implement Diagnostic Assessments Is Crucial For Maximizing The Impact Of These Assessments On Student Achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 25(3).

Putri, S. (2024). Perkembangan Kurikulum Di Indonesia: Dari 1945 Hingga Kurikulum Merdeka. Denpasar: Rajawali Press.

Raharjo, I. (2018). Diagnostic Assessments Not Only Measure Students' Baseline Knowledge But Also Help In Detecting Potential Learning Barriers, Enabling Teachers To Take Proactive Steps. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research, 18(1).

Santosa, S., & Yuliana, A. (2022). Effective Follow-Up Strategies After Diagnostic Assessments Are Essential For Sustaining Learning Progress And Ensuring Students' Continuous Improvement. Journal of Teaching and Learning Strategies, 29(3).

Sari, L., & Lestari, N. (2021). A Successful Implementation Of Diagnostic Assessments Relies Heavily On Teacher Preparedness, Particularly In Designing Clear, Targeted Assessment Instruments. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 25(3).

Sufyadi, A. (2021). Asesmen Diagnostik Untuk Pembelajaran Yang Efektif Di Sekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan, 18(2), 45-57.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Dan Kuantitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suryani, D., & Susanto, A. (2021). Early Identification Of Students’ Strengths And Weaknesses Through Diagnostic Assessment Can Enhance The Overall Effectiveness Of The Learning Process. Journal of Educational Strategies, 29(3).

Widodo, D. (2019). The Use Of Diagnostic Assessments Helps To Provide A Foundation For Differentiated Instruction, Allowing Teachers To Respond Effectively To The Diverse Learning Needs Of Students. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 7(2).

Yusuf, M. (2017). Asesmen Dalam Pendidikan: Konsep, Teori, Dan Aplikasi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Downloads

Published

21-05-2025

How to Cite

Arinto, F. J. B. ., Ginting, R. B., & Wuryandini, E. (2025). The Implementation of Diagnostik Assessment in Geography Education Within the Merdeka Curriculum. Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(3), 337–343. https://doi.org/10.37329/cetta.v8i3.4283

Issue

Section

Articles