Sacred and Rational Negotiations

The Contestation between Ulu Desa and Prajuru Desa in Pedawa and Julah, North Bali

Authors

  • Ida Bagus Gede Paramita Universitas Udayana
  • I Nyoman Suarka Universitas Udayana
  • Ida Bagus Gde Pujaastawa Universitas Udayana
  • I Wayan Suardiana Universitas Udayana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37329/ijms.v3i3.4840

Keywords:

Bali Aga, Panopticon, Power Hybridization, State Regulation, Social Transformation

Abstract

This study examines the contestation between Ulu Desa (sacred-traditional authority) and Prajuru Desa (administrative authority) in the Bali Aga villages of Pedawa and Julah, which reflects the ongoing tension between customary governance and state regulation. The research aims to analyze how historical trajectories, regulatory frameworks, and socio-economic transformations have shaped the dynamics between sacred and bureaucratic leadership. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews, participant observation, and document analysis, and interpreted with Bourdieu’s concepts of habitus, capital, and field as well as Foucault’s theories on power and discourse. The findings reveal that, (1) historical practices of surveillance embedded dual forms of discipline ritual and administrative within village governance, (2) the penetration of state mechanisms, particularly through village competitions and regional regulations, gradually displaced sacred legitimacy in favor of bureaucratic authority and (3) socio-economic factors such as migration, education, technology, and financial support further reinforced the dominance of Prajuru Desa. Nevertheless, Ulu Desa continues to hold symbolic significance as a guardian of cosmological order. In conclusion, the study demonstrates that the contestation between these two institutions illustrates a hybridization of power in Bali Aga society, where tradition and modernity coexist through tension, negotiation, and adaptation.

References

Agung, I. A. A. G. (1989). Bali Pada Abad XIX. Denpasar: Upada Sastra.

Antonio, G. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. New York: International Publishers.

Ardika, I. W. (2018). Sejarah Bali: Dari Prasejarah Hingga Modern. Denpasar: Udayana University Press.

Asad, T. (1986). The Idea Of An Anthropology Of Islam. Washington, DC: Georgetown University.

Atmadja, N. B. (2010). Bali Pada Masa Lampau. Denpasar: Pustaka Larasan.

Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique Of The Judgment Of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms Of Capital. Handbook Of Theory And Research For The Sociology Of Education. New York: Greenwood.

Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic Of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, And Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Dharmawan, N. S. (2020). Demokrasi Berbasis Konsensus Dalam Sistem Ulu Desa di Bali Aga. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 9(2), 115-130.

Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews And Other Writings, 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books.

Geertz, C. (1980). Negara: The Theatre State In Nineteenth-Century Bali. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences Of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Goris, R. (1957). Prasasti Bali I. Bandung: Masa Baru.

Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections From The Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. New York: International Publishers.

Hardjowardojo, S. (2017). Kearifan Lokal Dan Regulasi Negara: Tantangan Desa Adat Bali. Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia, 38(2), 112-126.

Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, Texts And Affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441-456.

Jolonidhi, A. A. I., & Rini, I. A. D. (2021). Teknologi Komunikasi Dan Dinamika Paruman Desa Adat Di Bali. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 18(1), 55-72.

Korn, V. E. (1932). Het Adatrecht Van Bali. ’s-Gravenhage: M. Nijhoff.

Maheni, N. L. P. E., et al. (2021). Regulasi Desa Adat Bali: Studi Komparatif Perda No. 6/1986, No. 3/2001, dan No. 4/2019. Jurnal Hukum dan Kebudayaan, 12(1), 22-39.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Prasada, D. K., Sulyantha, K. R., Manuaba, I. B. A. L., & Dvaipayana, I. P. D. K. (2024). Authority Of Customary Village Heads In Bali From A Positive Legal Perspective At The Local Level. Indonesian Journal of Law and Islamic Law, 6(2), 140-159.

Reid, A. (2001). Southeast Asia In The Age Of Commerce 1450-1680. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Sastrodiwiryo, S. (1983). Sejarah Pemerintahan Bali Kuno. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing Like A State: How Certain Schemes To Improve The Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Swanson, D. (2018). Traditional Governance In Bali And Globalization. Asian Anthropology, 17(3), 210-226.

Sylviani, S., & Tohani, E. (2022). Media Sosial Dan Transformasi Komunikasi Desa Adat. Jurnal Masyarakat dan Budaya, 24(1), 55-72.

Tsuchiya, K. (1986). Sociopolitical Change And Cultural Continuity in Bali. Tokyo: Institute of Developing Economies.

Warren, C. (1991). Adat And Dinas: Balinese Communities In The Indonesian State. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

30-09-2025

How to Cite

Paramita, I. B. G. ., Suarka, I. N. ., Pujaastawa, I. B. G. ., & Suardiana, I. W. . (2025). Sacred and Rational Negotiations: The Contestation between Ulu Desa and Prajuru Desa in Pedawa and Julah, North Bali. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences, 3(3), 269–277. https://doi.org/10.37329/ijms.v3i3.4840

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)