Profesionalisme Reflektif Situasional Guru Vokasi Pada Kelas Heterogen

Studi Etnografi Sekolah Pariwisata

Authors

  • I Gusti Kadek Surya Adnyana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • I Wayan Santyasa Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • I Made Tegeh Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37329/cetta.v9i2.5433

Keywords:

Teacher Professionalism, Vocational Learning, Heterogeneous Classrooms, Situational Reflective Professionalism, Educational Ethnography

Abstract

Research on vocational teachers’ professional competence has generally positioned professionalism as pedagogical ability and mastery of subject matter that are administrative and normative in nature, while the reflective and situational dimensions of teaching in heterogeneous classrooms remain underexplored, particularly from the perspective of educational ethnography. This study aims to analyze teachers’ professional practices in actualizing vocational learning competencies within heterogeneous classrooms at SMKS Pariwisata Triatma Jaya Singaraja. The study employed a qualitative approach using an educational ethnography design. Data were collected through participant observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation involving five vocational teachers, the principal, and thirty students. Data analysis was conducted interactively through data condensation, data display, verification, and conclusion drawing, which were further deepened through domain, taxonomic, componential, and cultural theme analyses. The findings reveal that teachers’ professional competence develops adaptively through teaching experience, pedagogical improvisation, and situational reflection in responding to the dynamics of heterogeneous classrooms. However, the learning process remains dominated by teacher-centered approaches, the integration of theory and practice is still sequential, and differentiated instruction has not been systematically designed. Teachers’ reflective practices also tend to occur in the form of spontaneous reflection-in-action rather than structured reflection-on-action. This study constructs the concept of “situational reflective professionalism” as a form of teacher professionalism that develops through pedagogical adaptability, contextual reflection, and responsive decision-making within dynamic learning situations. Theoretically, this study contributes to the development of vocational teacher professionalism studies grounded in reflective practice and contextual learning, while practically emphasizing the importance of reflective culture, differentiated instruction, and strengthening teachers’ adaptive capacities in transforming twenty-first century vocational education.

References

Aisah, A., Maufur, M., & Basukiyatno, B. (2024). Implementasi Komunitas Praktisi Dalam Meningkatkan Kompetensi Profesional Guru Bersertifikat Pendidik. Journal of Education Research, 5(3), 3072-3082.

Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher Professional Development In Teaching And Teacher Education Over Ten Years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10-20.

Cattaneo, A. A., & Motta, E. (2021). “I Reflect, Therefore I am… A Good Professional”. On the Relationship Between Reflection-On-Action, Reflection-In-Action And Professional Performance In Vocational Education. Vocations and Learning, 14(2), 185-204.

Farrell, T. S. C. (2018). Research On Reflective Practice In TESOL. TESOL Journal, 9(1), 1-20.

Heinrich, W. F., & Green, P. M. (2020). Remixing Approaches To Experiential Learning, Design, And Assessment. Journal of Experiential Education, 43(2), 205-223.

Ilyas, I. (2022). Strategi Peningkatan Kompetensi Profesional Guru. Jurnal Inovasi, Evaluasi Dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran (JIEPP), 2(1), 34-40.

Iskandar, D. (2018). Implementasi Kompetensi Profesional Guru Dalam Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Peserta Didik. Journal of Management Review, 2(3), 261-270.

Korthagen, F. A. J. (2017). Inconvenient Truths About Teacher Learning: Towards Professional Development 3.0. Teachers and Teaching, 23(4), 387-405.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework For Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.

Pozas, M., Letzel, V., & Schneider, C. (2021). Teachers And Differentiated Instruction: Exploring Differentiation Practices To Address Student Diversity. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 21(4), 278-294.

Sajidah, A. A., Anindya, S., Khadafiah, H., & Fajriyah, R. Z. (2025). Desain Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi Dalam Kurikulum Merdeka pada Mata Pelajaran PAI di SD/MI: Kajian Literatur. JIIP-Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(7), 7059-7062.

Sarkar, M., Gutierrez-Bucheli, L., Yip, S. Y., Lazarus, M., Wright, C., White, P. J., Ilic, D., Hiscox, T. J., & Berry, A. (2024). Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) In Higher Education: A Systematic Scoping Review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 144, 104608.

Schubatzky, T., Burde, J. P., Große-Heilmann, R., Haagen-Schützenhöfer, C., Riese, J., & Weiler, D. (2023). Predicting The Development Of Digital Media PCK/TPACK: The Role of PCK, Motivation To Use Digital Media, Interest In And Previous Experience With Digital Media. Computers & Education, 206, 104900.

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth In Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge And Teaching: Foundations Of The New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.

Suprayogi, M. N., Valcke, M., & Godwin, R. (2017). Teachers And Their Implementation Of Differentiated Instruction In The Classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67(67), 291-301

Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Brimijoin, K., Conover, L. A., & Reynolds, T. (2003). Differentiating Instruction In Response To Student Readiness, Interest, And Learning Profile In Academically Diverse Classrooms: A Review Of Literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(2-3), 119-145.

Upa, R., Indah, O. D., & Damayanti, S. (2024). From Plan–Do–See to Real Differentiation: Tracing Teachers’ Shifts in Differentiated Instruction Across Lesson Study (A Case Study in Vocational High Schools). Indonesian TESOL Journal, 6(2), 208-221.

Wati, S., & Nurhasannah, N. (2024). Penguatan Kompetensi Guru Dalam Menghadapi Era Digital. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dasar: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dan Hasil Penelitian, 10(2), 149-155.

Wheelahan, L. (2015). Not Just Skills: What A Focus On Knowledge Means For Vocational Education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(6), 750-762.

Downloads

Published

30-05-2026

How to Cite

Surya Adnyana, I. G. K., Santyasa, I. W., & Tegeh, I. M. (2026). Profesionalisme Reflektif Situasional Guru Vokasi Pada Kelas Heterogen: Studi Etnografi Sekolah Pariwisata. Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 9(2), 335–348. https://doi.org/10.37329/cetta.v9i2.5433

Issue

Section

Articles