Pengaruh Sarana Dan Prasarana Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa

Authors

  • Lisda Gea Universitas Nias
  • Envilwan Berkat Harefa Universitas Nias

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37329/cetta.v8i2.3564

Keywords:

Student Learning Outcomes, Facilities and Infrastructure

Abstract

Education is a learning process that aims to develop individual potential optimally, including aspects of knowledge, skills, attitudes and moral values. The success of the educational process is greatly influenced by the availability of facilities and infrastructure, both in schools and universities. Facilities and infrastructure are the main components that support learning activities. The absence of these facilities can hinder the learning process, which ultimately affects student learning outcomes. This research aims to analyze the influence of facilities and infrastructure on student learning outcomes at SMK Negeri 1 Lotu. The research method uses a quantitative approach with a descriptive design. The research subjects were 21 class XII students of the Department of Design, Modeling and Building Information (DPIB). Data was obtained through questionnaires for facilities and infrastructure variables, as well as documentation for learning outcome variables. The data analysis technique uses a simple linear regression formula. The research results show that there is a positive and significant influence between facilities and infrastructure on student learning outcomes. The simple regression equation obtained is Ŷ = 48.329 + 0.425X, meaning that every increase in one unit of facilities and infrastructure increases learning outcomes by 0.425 points. Hypothesis test (tcount = 2.744>ttable=2.074tcount = 2.744 > ttable = 2.074tcount=2.744>ttable=2.074) with a significant value of 0.013 (<0.05) indicating the alternative hypothesis is accepted. The contribution of facilities and infrastructure to student learning outcomes is 28.4%. In conclusion, facilities and infrastructure play an important role in student learning outcomes, but other factors such as teaching quality, motivation and learning environment also need to be considered to achieve optimal learning outcomes.

References

Azwar, S. (1996). Tes Prestasi: Fungsi Dan Pengembangan Pengukuran Prestasi Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Amruddin, Priyanda, R., Ariantini, S., Rusmayani, N. G. A. L., Aslidar, D. A., Ningsih, K. P., Wulandari, S., Putranto, P., Yuniati, I., Untari, I., Mujiani, S., Wicaksono, D. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif. Sukaharjo: Pradina Pustaka.

Abdullah, K., Jannah, M., Aiman, U., Hadsa, S., Fadilla, Z., Ardiawan, K. N., & Sari, M. (2021). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif. Pidie: Yayasan Penerbit Muhammad Zaini.

Banurea, R. A. & Oda, K. (2017). Manajemen Sarana dan Prasarana Pendidikan. Medan: Cv.Widya Puspita.

Bafadal, I. (2008). Manajemen Perlengkapan Sekolah: Teori Dan Aplikasinya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Citriadin, Y. (2019). Pengantar Pendidilam. Fakultas Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan UIN Mataram.

Hermawan, D. (2021). Manajeman Sarana Dan Prasarana. Jawa Timur: Klik Media.

Hamalik, O. (2012). Pendekatan Baru Strategi Belajar Mengajar Berdasarkan CBSA. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo.

Margono, S. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Mujahiddah, A. N. (2022). Pengaruh Sarana dan Prasarana Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa di SMA Unggulan Mafazah Bogor. Al-Munadzomah, 1(2), 81-90.

Nurhayati, D. (2022). Pengembangan Kurikulum. Bima: Hamjah Diha Foundation.

Qomar, M. (2007). Manajemen Pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Rodliyah. (2021). Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan. IAIN Jember Press.

Sumantri, D., Subijanto, S., Siswantari, S., Sudiyono, S., & Warsana, W. (2017). Pengelolaan Pendidikan Kejuruan: Pengembangan Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK) 4 Tahun. Jakaria: Pusat Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Balitbang, Kemdikbud.

Susanti, E., & Dewi, D. E. C. (2024). Analisis Komponen Desain Pengembangan Kurikulum Pendidikan Agama Islam di SDN 04 Seluma. Al-Khair Journal: Management Education, 4(2), 178-189.

Sudjana, N. (2005). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sugiyono, D. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suprihatiningrum, J. (2010). Strategi Pembelajaran. Jogjakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

Suprijono, A. (2009). Cooperative Learning: Teori Dan Aplikasi Paikem. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Syah, M. (2010). Psikologi Pendidikan Dengan Pendekatan Baru. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Trianto, & Tutik, T. T. (2011). Pengantar Penelitian Pendidikan Bagi Pengembangan Profesi Pendidikan & Tenaga Kependidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.

Winarno, M. E. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian dalam Pendidikan Jasmani. Kuala Lumpur: UM PRESS.

Downloads

Published

13-02-2025

How to Cite

Gea, L., & Harefa, E. B. . (2025). Pengaruh Sarana Dan Prasarana Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(2), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.37329/cetta.v8i2.3564