Pengaruh Sarana Dan Prasarana Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37329/cetta.v8i2.3564Keywords:
Student Learning Outcomes, Facilities and InfrastructureAbstract
Education is a learning process that aims to develop individual potential optimally, including aspects of knowledge, skills, attitudes and moral values. The success of the educational process is greatly influenced by the availability of facilities and infrastructure, both in schools and universities. Facilities and infrastructure are the main components that support learning activities. The absence of these facilities can hinder the learning process, which ultimately affects student learning outcomes. This research aims to analyze the influence of facilities and infrastructure on student learning outcomes at SMK Negeri 1 Lotu. The research method uses a quantitative approach with a descriptive design. The research subjects were 21 class XII students of the Department of Design, Modeling and Building Information (DPIB). Data was obtained through questionnaires for facilities and infrastructure variables, as well as documentation for learning outcome variables. The data analysis technique uses a simple linear regression formula. The research results show that there is a positive and significant influence between facilities and infrastructure on student learning outcomes. The simple regression equation obtained is Ŷ = 48.329 + 0.425X, meaning that every increase in one unit of facilities and infrastructure increases learning outcomes by 0.425 points. Hypothesis test (tcount = 2.744>ttable=2.074tcount = 2.744 > ttable = 2.074tcount=2.744>ttable=2.074) with a significant value of 0.013 (<0.05) indicating the alternative hypothesis is accepted. The contribution of facilities and infrastructure to student learning outcomes is 28.4%. In conclusion, facilities and infrastructure play an important role in student learning outcomes, but other factors such as teaching quality, motivation and learning environment also need to be considered to achieve optimal learning outcomes.
References
Azwar, S. (1996). Tes Prestasi: Fungsi Dan Pengembangan Pengukuran Prestasi Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Amruddin, Priyanda, R., Ariantini, S., Rusmayani, N. G. A. L., Aslidar, D. A., Ningsih, K. P., Wulandari, S., Putranto, P., Yuniati, I., Untari, I., Mujiani, S., Wicaksono, D. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif. Sukaharjo: Pradina Pustaka.
Abdullah, K., Jannah, M., Aiman, U., Hadsa, S., Fadilla, Z., Ardiawan, K. N., & Sari, M. (2021). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif. Pidie: Yayasan Penerbit Muhammad Zaini.
Banurea, R. A. & Oda, K. (2017). Manajemen Sarana dan Prasarana Pendidikan. Medan: Cv.Widya Puspita.
Bafadal, I. (2008). Manajemen Perlengkapan Sekolah: Teori Dan Aplikasinya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Citriadin, Y. (2019). Pengantar Pendidilam. Fakultas Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan UIN Mataram.
Hermawan, D. (2021). Manajeman Sarana Dan Prasarana. Jawa Timur: Klik Media.
Hamalik, O. (2012). Pendekatan Baru Strategi Belajar Mengajar Berdasarkan CBSA. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo.
Margono, S. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Mujahiddah, A. N. (2022). Pengaruh Sarana dan Prasarana Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa di SMA Unggulan Mafazah Bogor. Al-Munadzomah, 1(2), 81-90.
Nurhayati, D. (2022). Pengembangan Kurikulum. Bima: Hamjah Diha Foundation.
Qomar, M. (2007). Manajemen Pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Rodliyah. (2021). Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan. IAIN Jember Press.
Sumantri, D., Subijanto, S., Siswantari, S., Sudiyono, S., & Warsana, W. (2017). Pengelolaan Pendidikan Kejuruan: Pengembangan Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK) 4 Tahun. Jakaria: Pusat Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Balitbang, Kemdikbud.
Susanti, E., & Dewi, D. E. C. (2024). Analisis Komponen Desain Pengembangan Kurikulum Pendidikan Agama Islam di SDN 04 Seluma. Al-Khair Journal: Management Education, 4(2), 178-189.
Sudjana, N. (2005). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sugiyono, D. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suprihatiningrum, J. (2010). Strategi Pembelajaran. Jogjakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Suprijono, A. (2009). Cooperative Learning: Teori Dan Aplikasi Paikem. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Syah, M. (2010). Psikologi Pendidikan Dengan Pendekatan Baru. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Trianto, & Tutik, T. T. (2011). Pengantar Penelitian Pendidikan Bagi Pengembangan Profesi Pendidikan & Tenaga Kependidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.
Winarno, M. E. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian dalam Pendidikan Jasmani. Kuala Lumpur: UM PRESS.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Lisda Gea, Envilwan Berkat Haref

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
An author who publishes in the Cetta : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan agrees to the following terms:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.