Evaluasi Implementasi Kurikulum Cambridge dengan Model CIPP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37329/cetta.v7i1.3040Keywords:
Evaluasi Kurikulum, Kurikulum Cambridge, Model CIPPAbstract
This research aims to evaluate the implementation of the Cambridge curriculum using the CIPP evaluation model with four evaluation components, namely context, input, process, and product. The research was carried out at Al Azhar 13 Islamic Junior High School, Surabaya. This research is evaluation research using a qualitative approach. The data analysis technique used is the Miles, Huberman & Saldana’s technique, namely data condensation, display, and verification. The results of the research show that Al Azhar 13 Islamic Junior High School carried out a good context evaluation, one of which was the program background, objectives, and environmental factors and needs. Input evaluation was also carried out well, demonstrated by the existence of resource factors that support curriculum implementation, namely human resources and infrastructure. The process evaluation was carried out well and went through several process stages from planning to evaluation. Product evaluation was also carried out well, demonstrated by the results and impact of curriculum implementation. The conclusion given is in the form of a recommendation for Al Azhar 13 Islamic Junior High School Surabaya to continue implementing the Cambridge curriculum to increase international insight and the quality of education.
References
Alek, R., Fitria, H., Eddy, S. (2021). The Role of Teachers in Implementing Curriculum 13 in Primary School. Jurnal Penelitian Guru Indonesia, 6(01), 291-295.
Arifin, Z. (2017). Konsep dan Model Pengembangan Kurikulum. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Badrujaman, A. (2011). Teori dan Aplikasi Evaluasi Program Bimbingan Konseling. Jakarta: Indeks.
Darodjat. Wahyudhiana M. (2015). Model Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Islamadina, 14(1), 1-28.
Diocolano, G, N., Nafiah. (2019). Implementasi Kurikulum Cambridge di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pengembangan Sekolah Dasar, 7(01), 38-45.
Fahma, A., Mesiono., Hadijaya, Y. (2021). Leading Class Program Evaluation in Improving the Quality of Education. Tarbawi: Jurnal Keilmuan Manajemen Pendidikan, 7(02), 233-242.
Fatimah, Laeli & Fatayan, Arum. (2022). Analisis Pengembangan Kurikulum Cambridge dalam Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Project-Based Learning di Sekolah Dasar Islam. Jurnal Paedagogy, 9(4), 716-723.
Fitria, S. D., Suyono, G., Rokhman, M. (2021). Implementasi Kurikulum Cambridge di SDI Kreatif Mutiara Anak Sholeh Sukodono Sidoarjo. IRSYADUNA: Jurnal Studi Kemahasiswaaan, 1(2), 188-198.
Fuadi, A. S., Anas, M. (2019). Evaluasi Model CIPP dalam Evaluasi Kurikulum 2013 Pendidikan Ekonomi. Prosiding SEMDIKJAR (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran), 3, 316–324.
Hasan, H. (2021). Evaluasi Kurikulum. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.
Laili, D. R., Soedjarwo. (2019). Implementasi Kurikulum Cambridge pada Sistem Pembelajaran di MI Muslimat NU Pucang Sidoarjo. E-Journal Unesa, 7(3), 1-11.
Matshe., Mahlangu, V, P. (2014). Realigning the Curriculum for the Societal’s Needs in the 21st Century. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(27), 291–297.
Rahayu, P, V., Aly, N. H. (2023). Evaluasi Kurikulum. Journal on Education, 05(03), 5692-5699.
Ramadianti, A. A. (2023). Analisis Global Implementasi Kurikulum Cambridge dalam Dunia Pendidikan. Ecodunamika, 4(2).
Sangia, R. A., Andrias, A., Efendi, E., Alfiyanto, A., & Pramana, I. B. B. S. A. (2022). Evaluation of the Adiwiyata Program at Junior High School 23 Palembang. Tarbawi: Jurnal Keilmuan Manajemen Pendidikan, 8(01), 129–138.
Sanjaya, W. (2011). Pembelajaran dalam Implementasi Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi. Jakarta: Kencana.
Stufflebeam, D. L., Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP Evaluation Model: How to Evaluate for Improvement and Accountability. Guilford Press.
Sukmadinata, S. N. (2010). Pengembangan Kurikulum: Teori dan Praktek. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya,
Warju. (2016). Educational Program Evaluation using CIPP Model. Jurnal UPI: Innovation of Vocational Technology Education, 12(1), 36-42.
Widjanarko, J. Budiyono. (2018). Implementasi Kurikulum Cambridge dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. JPGSD, 06(06), 1030–1039.
Wiguna Yasa, I. M., Wijaya, I. K. W. B., Supadmini, N. K., Putra Aryana, I. M., & Hana, N. D. (2023). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (IPA) Pada Adi Widya Pasraman Di Provinsi Bali Dengan Model Evaluasi Context Input Process Product (CIPP). Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(4), 877–887.
Zohriah, A. (2015). Analisis Standar Sarana dan Prasarana. Tarbawi: Jurnal Keilmuan Manajemen Pendidikan, 1(02), 53-62.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sufyan Suri, Muhamad Sholeh, Erny Roesminingsih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
An author who publishes in the Cetta : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan agrees to the following terms:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.
