Kontestasi Keberagamaan Umat Hindu dan Islam Wetu Telu di Pura Lingsar Lombok Barat

Authors

  • Anak Agung Ngurah Anom Kumbara Universitas Udayana
  • Nanang Sutrisno Universitas Udayana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37329/jpah.v8i2.2725

Keywords:

Ideology, Religiosity, Contestation, Capital

Abstract

Each religion has a different system of theology, beliefs, religious institutions, and religious practices, in addition to having certain values in common. At the ideal level, religion is believed to be able to create order, integration, and social harmony in society. However, at the empirical level, religion often shows paradoxical phenomena as a source of disintegration and conflict triggered by differences in religious ideology and practice. The purpose of this study is to explore and understand the dynamics of the contestation between Wetu Telu Muslims and Hindus and its implications. The data collection method is carried out by observation techniques, interviews, and document studies. Data analysis was carried out qualitatively based on the social practice theory and phenomenology. This study found that the dynamics of contestation of Wetu Telu Muslims and Hindus in Lingsar Temple represent the influence of modernization and the articulations of religiosity identity in the realm of ideological superstructure, social structure, as well as economic and demographic infrastructure. The implications of this contestation include the polarization of religious practices, the strengthening of group identities, and the struggle for capital resources belonging to Lingsar Temple.

References

Abdullah, M. A. (2017). Menengok Kembali Peran Agama di Ruang Publik. Jurnal Sosiologi Agama, 11(2), 157-184.

Asyari, M. M., Ismaya, E. A., Ahsin, M. N. (2021). Nilai-Nilai Pendidikan Karakter dalam Tradisi Apitan Masyarakat Singocandi Kudus. WASIS: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 2(1), 34-40.

Barker, C. (2004). Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice. New York: Sage Publications.

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann. T. (1973). The Sosial Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Garden City New York: Acor.

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of A Theory of Practice. England: Cambridge University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Simbolic Power. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (2010). Arena Produksi Kultural Sebuah Kajian Sosiologi Budaya (Penerjemah: Y.Santoso). Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana.

Budiwanti, E. (2000). Islam Sasak Wetu Telu versus Waktu Lima. Yogyakarta: LkiS.

Budiwanti, E. (2003). Mempertahankan Identitas dan Toleransi Antaragama Minoritas Muslim di Lombok dan Bali. Konflik Komunal di Indonesia Saat ini, Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa dan Budaya UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.

Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Culture. New York: Basic Books.

Haryani, E. (2019). Intoleransi dan Resistensi Masyarakat terhadap Kemajemukan: Studi Kasus Kerukunan Beragama di Kota Bogor, Jawa Barat. Harmoni, 18, 73-90.

Izzati, H. (2022). Segregasi Sosial, Pendidikan Islam Multikulturalisme Media Resolusi Konflik Untuk Harmoni. Jurnal al Muta'aliyah: Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 2(1), 13-24.

Jamalie, Z. (2014). Akulturasi Dan Kearifan Lokal Dalam Tradisi Baayun Maulid Pada Masyarakat Banjar. el Harakah: Jurnal Budaya Islam, 16(2), 234-254.

Jayadi, S., Argyo, D., Drajat, T.K. (2017). Interaksi Sosial Umat Hindu dan Muslim dalam Upacara Keagamaan dan Tradisi Perang Topat di Lombok. Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi, 6(2), 54-63.

Kafid, N. (2015). Agama di Tengah Konflik Sosial: Tinjauan Sosiologis atas Potensi Konflik Keberagaman Agama di Masyarakat. Al-A'raf: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam dan Filsafat, 12(1), 1-13.

Kahmad, D. (2002). Sosiologi Agama. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Karda, I. M. (2015). Fenomena Kemaliq Lingsar Analisis Wetu Telu (Kajian) Perspektif Budaya. Media Bina Ilmiah, 9(2), 23-30.

Kumbara A. A. N. A. (2023). Teori Sosial Budaya Kontemporer. Denpasar: Sari Kahyangan.

Lubis, A. Y. (2015). Teori dan Metodologi: Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Budaya Kontemporer. Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Madison, D. S. (2012). Critical Ethnography: Method, Ethics, and Performance, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.

Miles, M. B, & Huberman, A. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Minarni, N. (2021). Menemukan Alternatif Model Dialog Antarumat Beragama (Belajar dari Forum Sobat). Jurnal Sosiologi Agama, 15(1), 87–106.

Palmer, D., & Caldas, B. (2016). Critical Ethnography. Research Methods in Language and Education. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 1-12.

Purna, I. M. (2020). Merajut Pluralisme di Desa Lingsar, Kecamatan Lingsar, Lombok Barat, Nusa Tenggara Barat (Pluralism Knitting in Lingsar Village, Lingsar Sub-district, Lombok Barat, West Nusa Tenggara). Forum Arkeologi, 33(2), 151-168.

Purwanto, E. S (2015). Pergulatan Ideologi dalam Keberagamaan Umat Hindu dan Islam di Pura Lingsar, Nusa Tenggara Barat. Disertasi tidak dipublikasikan. Denpasar: Universitas Hindu Indonesia.

Ritzer, G., & Goodman, D. J. (2004). Teori Sosiologi Modern. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

Sanderson, S. (2010). Teori Sosilogi Makro. Jakarta: Obor.

Saprillah, H. J., Nurman,S,, Hamzah, H.,A, R. (2020). Kontestasi Keagamaan dalam Masyarakat Muslim Urban, Jurnal Al- Qalam, 26(1), 2020.

Sarpin & Pramunarti, A. (2017). Upaya Masyarakat dalam Melestarikan Tradisi Perang Topat Sebagai Simbol Persaudaraan Umat Islam dan Hindu di Desa Lingsar Kecamatan Lingsar, Kabupaten Lombok Barat. Jurnal Kajian Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kependidikan, 2(2), 24-28.

Schutz, A. (1970). On Phenomenology and Social Relations. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Sindhunata. P. (2003).Jembatan Air Mata: Tragedi Manusia Pengungsi Timor. Yogyakarta: Galang Press.

Suartana, I. N. (2022). Upacara Perang Topat di Pura Lingsar Desa Lingsar, Kecamatan Lingsar, Kabupaten Lombok Barat (Perspektif Teologi Hindu). Jurnal Ekadanta, 3(1), 81-103.

Suhupawati, Z., Ramhawati, B. F., Hadi, M. S. (2021). Nilai-Nilai Sejarah Kemaliq Lingsar dan Perannya Bagi Kehidupan Masyarakat Desa Lingsar Lombok Barat. Jurnal Humanitas, 7(2), 108-121.

Sumertha, I. W. (2020). Pura Taman Lingsar, dalam Membangun Kohesi Sosial Antara Islam Wetu Telu Etnis Sasak dengan Komunitas Hindu Etnis Bali di Lombok. Widya Sandhi, 10(2), 1994-2013.

Suparno, B. A. (2010. Kontestasi Makna dan Dramatisme Komunikasi Politik tentang Reformasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 8(1), 1-12.

Sutrisno, N., & Kumbara, A. A. N. A. (2022). Cultural Adaptation Strategies of the Bali Hindu Community Within the Multicultural Society in Patoman Banyuwangi. Vidyottama Sanatana: International Journal of Hindu Science and Religious Studies, 6(2), 205-215.

Thompson, J. B. (2015). Kritik Ideologi Global (Penerjemah: Yaqin, H.). Yogyakarta:: IRCiSoD.

Wirata, I. W. (2023). Kohesifitas Sosial Harmoni Umat Beragama Pada Masyarakat Lombok (Pendekatan Sosiologi Agama). Jurnal Penelitian Agama Hindu, 7(3), 267-274.

Downloads

Published

17-04-2024

How to Cite

Anom Kumbara, A. A. N. ., & Sutrisno, N. (2024). Kontestasi Keberagamaan Umat Hindu dan Islam Wetu Telu di Pura Lingsar Lombok Barat. Jurnal Penelitian Agama Hindu, 8(2), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.37329/jpah.v8i2.2725

Issue

Section

Articles