Strategi Adaptasi Umat Hindu Memasuki Era Baru: Refleksi Sosiologi Hindu Menyikapi Revolusi Industri 4.0, Pandemi Covid-19, dan Society 5.0

Authors

  • Ida Bagus Gde Yudha Triguna Universitas Hindu Indonesia
  • Anak Agung Inten Mayuni Universitas Warmadewa
  • Nanang Sutrisno Kantor Kementerian Agama Kota Denpasar

Keywords:

New Era, Hindu Sociology, Adaptation Strategies

Abstract

The Industrial Revolution 4.0, the Covid-19 Pandemic, and the Society 5.0 are global phenomena that are driving social change towards a new era of the world society. Hindus also have to carry out adaptation strategies, both at the structural and cultural level in order to enter this new era. Sociological reflections on Hindu adaptation strategies are expressed through the phenomenological method which emphasizes the individual agency dimension and its integration with structural dynamics. The ability of Hindus to exercise control dialectics on the acceleration of information technology, ideological regulation and socio-cultural structures change in the new era is a determinant of success in their adaptation strategy.

References

Bennet, John F. (1976). The Ecological Transition, Cultural Anthropology & Human Adaptation. New York: Pergamon Press.
Dhavamony, Mariasusai. (1995). Fenomenologi Agama. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Ellen, Roy. (1982). Environment, Subsistence, & System. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Freidman, Thomas L. (2002). Lexus dan Pohon Zaitun. Bandung: Penerbit ITB.
Fukuyama, Francis. (1999). The Great Disruption: Human Nature and the Reconstruction of Social Order. London: Profiles Book.
Giddens, Anthony. (2010). Teori Strukturasi. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana.
Hardestry, Richard W. (1977). Ecological Anthropology. New York: John Wiley & Suns.
Huntington, Samuel P. (1996). The Clash of Civilization and The Remarking of World Other. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Li, Guoping; Hou Yun; and Wu Aizhi. (2017). “Fourth Industrial Revolution: Technological drivers, impacts and coping methods.” In Chinese Geographical Science. 2017, Vol. 27, p. 626–637.
Naisbitt, John. (1988). Global Paradox. New York: William Morrow and Company, Inc.
Parsons, Talcott. (1967). Sociological Theory and Modern Society. New York: The Free Press.
Pelly, Usman. (1998). Urbanisasi dan Adaptasi. Jakarta: LP3ES.
Sahlins, Marshall. (1976). Culture and Practice Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Salgues, B. (2018). Society 5.0: Industry of the Future, Technologies, Methods and Tools. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Sanderson, Stephen K. (2003). Makro Sosiologi, Sebuah Pendekatan Terhadap Realitas Sosial. Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafinfdo Persada.
Schwab, Klaus. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Geneva-Switzerland: World Economic Forum.
Toffler, Alvin. (1980). The Third Wave. New York: William Morrow and Company, Inc.
Triguna, Ida Bagus Gde Yudha. (1997). “Pengaruh Mobilitas Kelas dan Konflik Terhadap Penafsiran Kembali Simbolisme Masyarakat Hindu di Bali”. Disertasi – tidak dipublikasikan. Bandung: Universitas Padjajaran.
Triguna, Ida Bagus Gde Yudha. (2011). Mengapa Bali Unik. Jakarta: Pustaka Jurnal Keluarga.

Downloads

Published

01-10-2020

How to Cite

Yudha Triguna, I. B. G., Inten Mayuni, A. A. ., & Sutrisno, N. (2020). Strategi Adaptasi Umat Hindu Memasuki Era Baru: Refleksi Sosiologi Hindu Menyikapi Revolusi Industri 4.0, Pandemi Covid-19, dan Society 5.0. Jurnal Penelitian Agama Hindu, 4(4), 237–244. Retrieved from https://jayapanguspress.penerbit.org/index.php/JPAH/article/view/1226

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)