Perspektif Tri Kaya Parisudha Dan Karma Phala Pada Akuntabilitas Auditor Dengan Moderasi Beragama Sebagai Variabel Intervening

Authors

  • Ni Putu Ari Aryawati Institut Agama Hindu Negeri Gde Pudja Mataram
  • Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa Universitas Udayana
  • Ida Bagus Raka Suardana Universitas Pendidikan Nasional Denpasar

Keywords:

Tri Kaya Parisudha, Karma Phala, Religious Moderation, Auditor Accountability

Abstract

This study analyzes whether tri kaya parisudha, karma phala and religious moderation directly effect auditor accountability which tri kaya parisudha and karma phala indirectly effect auditor accountability with religious moderation as a mediating variable. This study are conducted in Mataram City with respondents being auditors in various sectors. This study used a questionnaire instrument as a data collection method. Analysis of the data in this research used Partial Least Square (PLS) 23.0 analysis. The results of direct analysis show that tri kaya parisudha affect positive significant to religious moderation and did not affect significantly to auditor accountability, karma phala affect positive significant to religious moderation and did not affect significantly to auditor accountability, and religious moderation directly affect positive significant ton auditor accountability. Tri kaya parisudha and karma phala influence full mediation on auditor accountability with religious moderation as an intervening variable. The results of this study contribute to support the role theory and provide an understanding of the influence of auditors spiritual capital in the perspective of tri kaya parisudha and karma phala. Auditors are expected to be able to use good thoughts to plan audits, take appropriate actions according to the code of ethics in conducting and deliver the correct audit results without being separated from the independence and professionalism of the auditors.

References

Ahmad, Z., & Taylor, D. (2009). Commitment to independence by internal auditors: the effects of role ambiguity and role conflict. Managerial Auditing Journal.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2022). Kota Mataram Dalam Angka 2022. Mataram: Badan Pusat Statistik.

Dewi, I Gusti Putu Eka Rustiana. (2019). Filosofi Tri Kaya Parisudha Memoderasi Pengaruh Equity Sensitivity dan Ethical Sensitivity Pada Perilaku Etik Auditor Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Perwakilan Provinsi Bali. Jurnal Penjaminan Mutu Institut Hindu Dharma Negeri Denpasar. Vol. 5 Nomor 1.

Elisha, M. S., & Icuk, R. B. (2010). Pengaruh Independensi, Pengalaman, Due Professional Care, dan Akuntabilitas Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Purwokerto: Jurnal Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XIII.

Ghozali, I.(2015). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete dengan Program IBM SPSS 23 (VIII). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. 2020. Kode Etik Akuntan Indonesia. Jakarta: Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia.

Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia. (2014). Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik (Standar Audit SA: 200). Jakarta : Salemba Empat.

Kajeng, I.N. (1997). Sarasamuccaya. Jakarta: Hanuman Sakti.

Kementerian Agama RI. (2019). Tanya Jawab Moderasi Beragama. Jakarta: Badan Litbang dan Diklat Kementerian Agama RI.

Kerlinger, F.N. (2004). Asas-Asas Penelitian Behavioral. Yogyakarta : Gadjah Mada University Press.

Mardisar, D., & Sari, R. N. (2007). Pengaruh akuntabilitas dan pengetahuan terhadap kualitas hasil kerja auditor. Simposium nasional akuntansi X, 26-28.

Messier Jr, W. F., Quilliam, W. C., Hirst, D. E., & Craig, D. (1992). The effect of accountability on judgment: Development of hypotheses for auditing; discussions; reply. Auditing, 11, 123.

Munidewi, I. A. B. (2017). Akuntabilitas dalam perspektif ajaran karma phala sebagai pedoman untuk membangun karakter auditor. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 1(2), 54-64.

Nainggolan, R. (2016). Gender, tingkat pendidikan dan lama usaha sebagai determinan penghasilan UMKM Kota Surabaya.

Nandari, A. W. S., & Latrini, M. Y. (2015). Pengaruh Sikap Skeptis, Independensi, Penerapan Kode Etik, Dan Akuntabilitas Terhadap Kualitas Audit. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 10(1), 164-181.

Nugrahaningsih, P. (2005). Analisis perbedaan perilaku etis auditor di KAP dalam etika profesi (Studi terhadap peran faktor-faktor individual: locus of control, lama pengalaman kerja, gender, dan equity sensitivity).

Pojman, Louis. P. (1989). Ethical Theory: Classical and Contemporary Readings. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont.

Robins, S. L. (2008). From revolution to rights in South Africa: Social movements, NGOs & popular politics after apartheid. Boydell & Brewer Ltd.

Roslender, Robin. 1992. Sociological Perspective on Modern Accountancy. London: Routledge.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. John Wiley & Sons.

Suardhika, Sadha. I Made. 2015. Mengenal Siapa Aku dalam Membangun atau Mengembangkan Ilmu Pengetahuan (Akuntansi). Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Udayana. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Bisnis. Vol.10. No 2, Juli 2015.

Sugiyono, D. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung : CV Alphabeta.

Sura, I Gede. 2001. Pengendalian Diri dan Etika dalam Ajaran Agama Hindu. Denpasar. Hanuman Sakti.

Tetlock, P. E. (1984). Cognitive style and political belief systems in the British House of Commons. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 46(2), 365.

Winarsunu, T. (2002). Statistik dalam Penelitian Psikologi dan Pendidikan. Malang: UMM Press.

Downloads

Published

25-12-2022

How to Cite

Ari Aryawati, N. P. ., Kerti Yasa, N. N., & Raka Suardana, I. B. . (2022). Perspektif Tri Kaya Parisudha Dan Karma Phala Pada Akuntabilitas Auditor Dengan Moderasi Beragama Sebagai Variabel Intervening. Jurnal Penelitian Agama Hindu, 27–40. Retrieved from https://jayapanguspress.penerbit.org/index.php/JPAH/article/view/2158