Implementasi Program Literasi Digital Untuk Penanggulangan Kenakalan Remaja di Nagari Panyakalan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37329/metta.v6i1.5160Keywords:
Act Stage, Action Research, Digital Literacy, Juvenile Delinquency, Program ImplementationAbstract
This research implements the Stringer Action Research framework to address juvenile delinquency through digital literacy in Nagari Panyakalan. The research analyzes the implementation process, strategies, and dynamics of the digital literacy program, as well as identifies supporting and inhibiting factors during the Act stage. Using a qualitative approach with Stringer's cyclical method (Look, Think, Act), the study focuses on the Act stage. Data were collected through participatory observation, in-depth interviews, and focus group discussions. Findings indicate that the Action phase, realized through the "Sahabat Remaja Panyakalan" program and the "Saring Sebelum Sharing" workshop, was successfully implemented using participatory and adaptive strategies. Key supporting factors included youth enthusiasm, community leader support, and basic digital infrastructure. Challenges included limited facilities, disparities in digital literacy, and some parental resistance. The Act stage proved effective in enhancing digital literacy, fostering positive behavioral change, and reducing juvenile delinquency cases, underscoring the importance of well-executed action phases in community-based interventions.
References
Anderson, E. (1999). Code Of The Street: Decency, Violence, And The Moral Life Of The Inner City. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory Of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘Digital Natives’ Debate: A Critical Review Of The Evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775-786.
Boyd, D. (2014). It's Complicated: The Social Lives Of Networked Teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Chambers, R. (1994). Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA): Analysis Of Experience. World Development, 22(9), 1253-1268.
Chaskin, R. J. (2001). Building Community Capacity: A Definitional Framework And Case Studies From A Comprehensive Community Initiative. Urban Affairs Review, 36(3), 291-323.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy Of The Oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
Green, G. P., & Haines, A. (2002). Asset Building & Community Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Goodman, R. M., & Steckler, A. B. (1989). A Model For The Institutionalization Of Health Promotion Programs. Family & Community Health, 11(4), 63-78.
Hargittai, E. (2010). Digital Na (t) Ives? Variation In Internet Skills And Uses Among Members Of The “Net Generation”. Sociological Inquiry, 80(1), 92-113.
Ife, J. (2016). Community Development in an Uncertain World: Vision, Analysis and Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Cody, R., Herr-Stephenson, B., & Tripp, L. (2010). Hanging Out, Messing Around, And Geeking Out: Kids Living And Learning With New Media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robison, A. J., & Weigel, M. (2009). Confronting The Challenges Of Participatory Culture: Media Education For The 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Kato, T. (1982). Matriliny and Migration: Evolving Minangkabau Traditions in Indonesia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying In The Digital Age: A Critical Review And Meta-Analysis Of Cyberbullying Research Among Youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073-1137.
Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (2011). Community-Based Participatory Research for Health: From Process to Outcomes. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse And Revival Of American Community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2008). The SAGE Handbook Of Action Research: Participative Inquiry And Practice. London, UK: Sage Publications.
Rothman, J. (1995). Strategies of Community Intervention. Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock Publishers.
Small, M. L. (2009). Unanticipated Gains: Origins Of Network Inequality In Everyday Life. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing "Neighborhood Effects": Social Processes And New Directions In Research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 443-478
Santrock, J. W. (2017). Life-Span Development. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
Selwyn, N. (2004). Reconsidering Political And Popular Understandings Of The Digital Divide. New Media & Society, 6(3), 341-362.
Solomon, P. (2004). Peer Support/Peer Provided Services: Underlying Processes, Benefits, And Critical Ingredients. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 27(4), 392-401.
Stringer, E. T. 2007. Action Research Third Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Williams, R., & Edge, D. (1996). The Social Shaping Of Technology. Research Policy, 25(6), 865-899.
Zastrow, C. (2016). Empowerment Series: Introduction to Social Work and Social Welfare. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yana Maulidia Jusra, Isbandi Rukminto Adi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Metta : Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the Metta : Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in Metta : Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Metta : Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
