Pemikiran Agustinus tentang Dosa dalam Terang 1 Yohanes 2:16

Sebuah Kajian atas Kejatuhan Manusia

Authors

  • Ferdinand Sitinjak Sekolah Tinggi Theologi IKAT Jakarta
  • Edhi Prasetyo Sekolah Tinggi Theologi IKAT Jakarta
  • Epifana Ongirwalu Sekolah Tinggi Theologi IKAT Jakarta
  • Abdon Amtiran Sekolah Tinggi Theologi IKAT Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37329/metta.v5i4.5001

Keywords:

Augustine, Sin, 1 John 2:16, Grace, Christian Spirituality

Abstract

Augustine's thinking on sin is one of the pillars of Christian theology, but it is often narrowed down to merely a moral transgression, rather than the existential condition of humanity after the Fall. In the modern context, marked by materialism and an increase in the intensity of worldly desires, this theological understanding needs to be re-examined. This study aims to analyze the relationship between Augustine's theological anthropology and the classification of three forms of sin in 1 John 2:16: the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life. Using a theological-hermeneutic qualitative analysis of patristic and biblical theology literature, this study presents a hermeneutic integration between Augustine's theology and John's hamartology. The results show that Augustine understands sin as misdirected love, namely the reversal of the human heart from God toward oneself (incurvatus in se), in line with the description of epithumia in 1 John. This study concludes that sin is an existential corruption of human nature manifested through disordered love. The novelty of this study lies in its integrative explanation of the relationship between Augustine's ordo amoris and the three categories of desire in 1 John 2:16, which enriches the theological understanding of the existential nature of sin in contemporary theological discourse.

References

Alli, D. (2025). Rekonstruksi Identitas Teologis: Menanggapi Kemerosotan Spiritual pada Remaja Kristen Akibat Dosa di Era Digital. AGATHA: Jurnal Teologi Dan Pendidikan Kristiani, 1(2), 125–141.

Augustine, S. (1991). Confessions (H. Chadwick, Trans.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 397–400).

Augustine, S. (1994). Enchiridion on Faith, Hope, and Love (J. F. Shaw, Trans.). Regnery Gateway. (Original work published ca. 421).

Augustine, S. (1998). The City of God Against the Pagans (R. W. Dyson, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.

Barth, K. (1956). Church Dogmatics: Vol. 4/1. The Doctrine of Reconciliation. T&T Clark.

Benediktus XVI. (2009). Caritas in Veritate. Libreria Editrice Vaticana.

Bonner, A. (2018). The Myth of Pelagianism. Oxford University Press.

Brown, P. (2000). Augustine of Hippo: A Biography. University of California Press.

Campbell, H. A. (2012). Digital Religion (Understanding Religious Practice in New Media Worlds). Routledge.

Couenhoven, J. (2007). Augustine’s Rejection of the Free-Will Defence: An Overview of the Late Augustine’s Theodicy. Cambridge University Press, 43(3), 279–298.

Evans, A. H. (2021). Augustine and Pelagius as a cameo of the dilemma between original sin and free will. Scriptura, 120(1).

Fransiskus, Paus. (2013). Evangelii Gaudium: Sukacita Injil. Libreria Editrice Vaticana.

Harmless, W. (2010). Augustine in His Own Words. Catholic University of America Press.

Hoover, S. M., & Clark, L. S. (2002). Practicing Religion in the Age of the Media: Explorations in Media, Religion, and Culture. Routledge.

Janssen, D. B. (2023). Augustine’s Enchiridion: An Anti-Pelagian Interpretation of the Creed. Religions, 14(3).

Katekismus Gereja Katolik. (1994). Katekismus Gereja Katolik. Obor.

Köstenberger, A. J. (2009). A Theology of John’s Gospel and Letters: The Word, the Christ, the Son of God. Zondervan.

Lewis, C. S. (2001). The Problem of Pain. HarperCollins.

Luna, R. F. (2024). « N’aimez pas le monde ni ce qui est dans le monde » (1 Jn 2,15): la première épître johannique au regard de la crise écologique. RELIER, 31(1).

Manaroinsong, T., Setiawan, A., Rananta, Y. C., Pasaribu, H., & Nicolas, D. G. (2022). Analisis peran Roh Kudus dalam eksistensi, pelayanan, dan pertumbuhan gereja. Asian Journal of Philosophy and Religion, 1(1), 15–28.

Merwe, D. G. van der. (2012). ‘Those who have been born of God do not sin, because God’s seed abides in them’ − Soteriology in 1 John. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 68(1).

Niebuhr, R. (1941). The Nature and Destiny of Man: Vol. 1. Human Nature. Charles Scribner’s Sons.

Nouwen, H. J. M. (1992). The Return of the Prodigal Son: A Story of Homecoming. Doubleday.

Pane, E. E. (2019). A Comperative Study: Original Sin on The View Between Augustine and Neo-Plaonism. Abstract Proceedings International Scholars Conference, 7(1), 2065–2083.

Ross, C. S. (2012). C. S. Lewis, Augustine, and the Rhythm of the Trinity. Journal of Inklings Studies, 2(1).

Sandlin, M. S. (2021). Love and do what you want: Augustine’s pneumatological love ethics. Religions, 12(8).

Schnackenburg, R. (1992). The Johannine Epistles: Introduction and Commentary. Crossroad/Herder & Herder.

Situmorang, S., & Sihombing, A. G. (2020). Dosa asal menurut Agustinus. Logos: Jurnal Filsafat-Teologi, 17(1).

Stott, J. (2006). The Message of Romans: God’s Good News for the World. InterVarsity Press.

Torchia, J. (2006). Creation, Finitude, and the Mutable Will: Augustine on the Origin of Moral Evil. Irish Theological Quarterly, 71(1–2), 47–66.

Yarbrough, R. W. (2008). 1–3 John (Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament). Baker Academic.

Downloads

Published

10-12-2025

How to Cite

Sitinjak, F., Prasetyo, E., Ongirwalu, E., & Amtiran, A. (2025). Pemikiran Agustinus tentang Dosa dalam Terang 1 Yohanes 2:16: Sebuah Kajian atas Kejatuhan Manusia. Metta : Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin, 5(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.37329/metta.v5i4.5001

Issue

Section

Articles