Analisis Yuridis Hukuman Mati Terhadap Pelaku Korupsi Dana Covid-19 Dalam Perpektif HAM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37329/metta.v5i3.4558Keywords:
Death Penalty, Corruption Crime, Pandemic Fund, Covid-19Abstract
Every action taken by humans will always have consequences. If the action taken is a bad action and has an impact on others, then this action will result in sanctions. This results in the need for clear rules made by the government in a country, in order to create harmony in society in the nation and state. Indonesia, although it allows the death penalty for perpetrators of crimes stated in Article 11 of the Criminal Code, including corruption, in fact the death penalty is very rarely carried out in Indonesia, one of the reasons for the rare death penalty is that people still think about human rights. This study aims to analyze the death penalty for perpetrators of corruption of the Covid-19 pandemic funds in terms of human rights. This research is a juridical-normative type of research, namely legal research conducted by the method of reviewing library materials. Giving the death penalty to corruptors is very appropriate because it can be used as shock therapy because psychologically corruptors who are sentenced can be used as an example to influence other parties not to commit corruption. The results of the study revealed a discrepancy between the harsh legal basis and the commitment to human rights principles in the Indonesian legal system. In addition, the failure to apply the death penalty to corruptors of pandemic funds was influenced by various factors, such as the direction of legal policy taken by the government, pressure from the international community, and the low integrity of law enforcement officers. This study concludes that the threat of the death penalty has not been able to function effectively as a deterrent because it is not accompanied by consistent law enforcement. Therefore, this study contributes to the discourse on reforming corruption criminalization policies by emphasizing the need for a balance between the values of justice, humanity, and legal effectiveness.
References
Akmal, D. U., & Madda, S. M. (2021). Memaknai Hukuman Mati Bagi Koruptor Berdasarkan Filsafat Hukum. Supremasi Hukum, 17(2), 40-47, hlm. 41.
Amelia Arief. (2019). Problematika Penjatuhan Hukuman Pidana Mati Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Dan Hukum Pidana. Kosmik Hukum 19.1
Andi Hamzah. (2005). Pemberantasan Korupsi melalui Hukum Pidana Nasional dan. Internasional. Jakarta: Grafindo Persada. Hlm. 226.
Chazawi, Adami. (2016). Hukum Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT.Raja Grafindo Persada.
Barda Nawawi Arief. (2014). Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan. Hukum Pidana dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group
Rahantoknam, B. (2013). Pidana Mati Bagi Koruptor. Lex Crimen, 2(7).
Hiariej, E. Q. (2009). Asas Legalitas & Penemuan Hukum Dalam Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Huda, C. (2011). Pola Pemberatan Pidana dalam Hukum Pidana Khusus. Jurnal Hukum Ius Qula Iustum, 18(4), 508-524.
Mertha, I. K. (2014). Efek Jera, Pemiskinan Koruptor, Dan Sanksi Pidana. Denpasar: Udayana University Press.
Adji, I. S. (2001). Pidana mati Bagi Koruptor Sebagai Upaya Pemberantasan Korupsi. Jurnal Keadilan.
Merryman, J., & Pérez-Perdomo, R. (2018). The civil law tradition: an introduction to the legal systems of Europe and Latin America. Stanford University Press.
Kartini, K. (1983). Pathologi Sosial. Jakarta: CV Rajawali Press
Lubis, T. M. (2009). Hukuman Mati Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan, 39(2), 255–270.
Muladi. (2002). Lembaga Pidana Bersyarat. Bandung: Alumni.
Lawalatta, O. (2013). Korupsi dan Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia. Diakses pada 17 Januari 2024 dari https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/korupsi/254korupsi-dan-pelanggaran-hak-asasimanusia
Rangkuti, I., Syahrin, A., Suhaidi., Mulyadi, Mahmud. (2021). Korupsi di Indonesia. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan
Simamora, J. (2014). Tafsir Makna Negara Hukum Dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 14(3), 547-561.
Sudirman, A. (2015). Eksistensi Pidana Minimum Khusus Sebagai Sarana Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 44(3), 316-325.
Yuhermansyah, E ; Fariza, Z. (2017). Pidana Mati Dalam Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Kajian Teori Zawajir dan Jawabir). Legitimasi, 6(1), 156–174.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sri Ridma Ramadhani, Muhammad Fikri Aufa, Mieke Aprilia Utami, Ichwan Ahnaz Alamudi, Sri Erliani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Metta : Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the Metta : Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in Metta : Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Metta : Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
