Kesiapan Otoritas Pelabuhan Teluk Bayur Menghadapi Era Kapal Otonom (Maritime Autonomous Surface Ship/MASS)

Authors

  • Elfira Wirza Politeknik Pelayaran Sumatera Barat
  • Achmad Ali Mashartanto Politeknik Pelayaran Sumatera Barat
  • Adhi Pratistha Silen Politeknik Pelayaran Banten

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37329/metta.v5i2.4077

Keywords:

Individual Readiness, Organizational Readiness, Port Authority

Abstract

The development of autonomous ships signifies progress in the application of information and communication technology within the marine transportation industry. The readiness of various supporting aspects, such as ports, must accompany the operation of autonomous ships. As a maritime nation with numerous ports, Indonesia must begin to prepare for the changes in the maritime industry resulting from technological advancements that support autonomous ship operations. Teluk Bayur Port in West Sumatra, one of the ports in Indonesia, must be equipped to adapt to these changes. A crucial aspect of this preparation is the ability of the port authority and its employees to adjust to the impacts of technology implementation. This study aims to evaluate the readiness level of the port authority and its employees to adapt to the operations of autonomous ships. The research includes a survey conducted through the distribution of questionnaires, which are analyzed using descriptive statistical methods, measuring both organizational readiness and port authority employee readiness variables. Employee readiness is assessed through three indicators, while organizational readiness is evaluated through seven indicators. The results indicate that the average employee readiness score is good at 4.14, and organizational readiness is also satisfactory at 3.96, both in adapting to the changes brought about by technological advancements regarding autonomous ships. Despite both variables' overall positive average scores, several indicators require improvement. For employee readiness, there is a need to enhance knowledge about autonomous ships and the ability to prevent cybercrime. For organizational readiness, improvements should focus on organizational management, the quality of human resources, ICT facilities and infrastructure, and financial aspects.

References

Amro, A., Gkioulos, V., & Katsikas, S. (2020). Connect And Protect: Requirements For Maritime Autonomous Surface Ship In Urban Passenger Transportation. Computer Security: ESORICS 2019 International Workshops, CyberICPS, SECPRE, SPOSE, and ADIoT, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg, September 26–27, 2019 Revised Selected Papers 5, 1-16.

Armenakis, A. A., Harris, S. G., & Mossholder, K. W. (1993). Creating Readiness For Organizational Change. Human relations, 46(6), 681-703.

Boohene, R., & Williams, A. A. (2012). Resistance To Organisational Change: A Case Study of Oti Yeboah Complex Limited. International Business and Management, 4(1), 135-145.

Choi, M., & Ruona, W. E. A. (2011). Individual Readiness For Organizational Change And Its Implications For Human Resource And Organization Development. Human Resource Development Review, 10(1), 46-73.

Dybvik, H., Veitch, E., & Steinert, M. (2020). Exploring Challenges With Designing And Developing Shore Control Centers (SCC) for Autonomous Ships. Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, 1(5), 847-856.

Gruppen, K. (2017). Autonomous Ship Project, Key Facts About YARA Birkeland - Kongsberg Maritime, 2-5.

Holt, D. T., Armenakis, A. A., Feild, H. S., & Harris, S. G. (2007). Readiness For Organizational Change: The Systematic Development Of A Scale. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(2), 232-255.

Ilham, A., Della, S. P., Buana, B. M., Syai’In, M., Munadhif, I., Endrasmono, J., Ryan Yudha, A., Jami’in, M. A., Subiyanto, L., Soelistijono, R. T., Wahidin, A., Fathulloh, Suhardjito, G., Budianto, A., & Soeprijanto, A. (2019). AuFloat (Autonomous Float) Based-on Artificial Inteligent and LORA (Long Range) Using Haar Cascade Method for Rescuing of Water Accident Victims. Proceeding-2019 International Symposium on Electronics and Smart Devices, ISESD 2019, 1-4.

Kasunic, M. (2001). Measuring Systems Interoperability Version 1.0.

Kurt, I., & Aymelek, M. (2024). Operational Adaptation Of Ports With Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships. Transport Policy, 145, 1-10.

Lee, M. H., Yun, J. H. J., Pyka, A., Won, D. K., Kodama, F., Schiuma, G., Park, H. S., Jeon, J., Park, K. B., Jung, K. H., Yan, M. R., Lee, S. Y., & Zhao, X. (2018). How To Respond To The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Or The Second Information Technology Revolution? Dynamic New Combinations Between Technology, Market, And Society Through Open Innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 4(3), 2-24.

Lehman, W. E. K., Greener, J. M., & Simpson, D. D. (2002). Assessing Organizational Readiness For Change. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 22(4), 197-209.

NTNU-Autoferry. (n.d.). Autoferry - NTNU.

Rachmatdhani, W., & Aryawan, W. D. (2020). Desain Small Autonomous Passenger Ferry di Teluk Bintuni. Jurnal Teknik ITS, 9(1), 37-42.

Rafferty, A. E., Jimmieson, N. L., & Armenakis, A. A. (2013). Change Readiness: A Multilevel Review. Journal of Management, 39(1), 110-135.

Rodrigue, J. P., & Notteboom, T. (2021). Automation in Container Port Systems and Management. TR News, 334, 20-25.

Rødseth, Ø. J. (2017). From Concept To Reality: Unmanned Merchant Ship Research In Norway. 2017 IEEE OES International Symposium on Underwater Technology, UT 2017.

Rødseth, Ø. J., Wennersberg, L. A. L., & Nordahl, H. (2022). Towards Approval Of Autonomous Ship Systems By Their Operational Envelope. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 27(1), 67-76.

Saha, R. (2023). Mapping Competence Requirements For Future Shore Control Center Operators. Maritime Policy & Management, 50(4), 415-427.

Samaranayake, S. U., & Takemura, T. (2017). Employee Readiness For Organizational Change: A Case Study In An Export Oriented Manufacturing Firm In Sri Lanka. Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, 10(20), 1-16.

Savolainen, S. (2016). Could Acceptance Predict Commitment in Organisational Change? Impact of Changes Caused by Succession From the Viewpoint of Non-family Employees in Small Family Firms. Management, 4(5), 197-215.

Sellberg, C., Lindmark, O., Rystedt, H., Chuah, L. F., Salleh, N. H. M., Osnin, N. A., Wang, J., Xiao, Y., Li, T., Chen, C. L. P., Xu, C., Bolmsten, J., Manuel, M. E., Kaizer, A., Kasepõld, K., Sköld, D., Ziemska, M., Beveridge, L., & Nguyen, P. T. (2020). Scenario Planning For An Autonomous Future: A Comparative Analysis Of National Preparedness Of Selected Countries. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 8(1), 1-9.

Simmons, E., & McLean, G. (2020). Understanding The Paradigm Shift In Maritime Education: The Role Of 4th Industrial Revolution Technologies: An Industry Perspective. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 12(1), 90-97.

Theotokatos, G., Dantas, J. L. D., Polychronidi, G., Rentifi, G., & Colella, M. M. (2023). Autonomous Shipping-An Analysis Of The Maritime Stakeholder Perspectives. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 22(1), 5-35.

Wang, J., Xiao, Y., Li, T., & Chen, C. L. P. (2020). A Survey of Technologies for Unmanned Merchant Ships. IEEE Access, 8, 224461-224486

Wegner, P. (1996). Interoperability. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 28(1), 285-287.

Downloads

Published

30-04-2025

How to Cite

Wirza, E., Mashartanto, A. A. ., & Silen, A. P. . (2025). Kesiapan Otoritas Pelabuhan Teluk Bayur Menghadapi Era Kapal Otonom (Maritime Autonomous Surface Ship/MASS). Metta : Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin, 5(2), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.37329/metta.v5i2.4077

Issue

Section

Articles