Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Visum Et Repertum Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan

(Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor: 221/Pid.B/2022/PN.Mtr.)

Authors

  • Dhammananda Institut Agama Hindu Negeri Gde Pudja Mataram
  • Dwi Ratna Kamala Sari Lukman Institut Agama Hindu Negeri Gde Pudja Mataram
  • Ni Nyoman Ernita Ratnadewi Institut Agama Hindu Negeri Gde Pudja Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37329/metta.v3i2.2640

Keywords:

Visum et Repertum, Evidence, Persecution

Abstract

This research was carried out with the aim of knowing and analyzing the legal force of Visum et Repertum and analyzing how the basic considerations of judges in deciding criminal cases of persecution in decision number: 221/Pid.B/2022/PN.Mtr. This is because in this decision the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for 7 (seven) months reduced while the defendant was in detention to 5 (five) months and 10 (ten) days. According to the authors, the sentence was light enough considering that the victim did not only suffer immaterial losses in the form of pain due to the abuse but also suffered material losses which caused the victim to be unable to move for 1 (one) month and unable to carry out her job as a go-kart driver. The method used is a normative research method with legal material collection techniques through literature studies and documentation studies. Furthermore, using descriptive analysis by describing, analyzing, concluding and reporting the research results obtained. The theory used is the theory of evidence and relative theory. The results of the study show that Visum et Repertum has the same legal force as other evidence, but in making a decision the element of the Judge's belief is the most decisive thing about the guilt or innocence of the defendant with at least 2 (two) pieces of evidence as the basis for the Judge's consideration. Judge's consideration in decision Number: 221/Pid.B/2022/PN.Mtr. based on witness testimony, expert testimony, and documentary evidence in the form of the results of the Visum et Repertum examination stating that the victim was truly injured. The basis for the Visum et Repertum is Visum et Repertum Number: VER: Sket/Ver/324/XII/2021/Rumkit signed by the examining doctor, dr. Dyah Mayang Ramadhani.

References

Afandi, D. (2017). Tata Laksana dan Teknik Pembuatan. VISUM ET REPERTUM, 2. http://fk.unri.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Dedi-Afandi.-Visum-et-repertum-Ed-2.pdf

Cahyani, N.P.M., dkk. (2021). Visum et Repertum Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.3.1.2021.122-128

Efritadewi, A. 2020. Modul Hukum Pidana. Tanjungpinang: UMRAH Press.

Gagundali, D.N. (2017). Visum Et Repertum Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Ringan Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. Lex Administratum, 5(9). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/administratum/article/view/18163/17687

Hamzah, A. 2005. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Lestawi, I.N. 2015. Hukum Hindu Serta Perkembangannya. Surabaya: Paramita.

Suhardianto, M. D. T. dan Arafat, M. R. (2022). Kekuatan Pembuktian Visum et Repertum Dalam Proses Persidangan Perkara Pidana Ditinjau Dari Hukum Acara Pidana. Jurnal Hukum Positum, 7(1). https://journal.unsika.ac.id/index.php/positum/article/view/5723/3327

Widyani, N. (2020). Sistematis Pembuktian Dalam Peradilan Menurut Hukum Hindu. Jurnal Hukum Hindu, 4(2), https://doi.org/10.55115/pariksa.v4i2.1157

Downloads

Published

18-07-2023

How to Cite

Dhammananda, Sari Lukman, D. R. K., & Ernita Ratnadewi, N. N. . (2023). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Visum Et Repertum Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan: (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor: 221/Pid.B/2022/PN.Mtr.). Metta : Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin, 3(2), 127–132. https://doi.org/10.37329/metta.v3i2.2640

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Dhammananda, Dwi Ratna Kamala Sari Lukman, Ni Nyoman Ernita Ratnadewi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Metta : Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the Metta : Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in Metta : Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Metta : Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).