Metode Pembelajaran Filsafat Hindu
Studi Teks Filsafat India Klasik dan Proyeksinya pada Pembelajaran Filsafat Hindu Dewasa ini
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37329/jpah.v6i4.1696Keywords:
Darśana, Praṣṭana-Trayā, Philosophy, Hindu Philosophy, UpaniṣadAbstract
The method of learning philosophy is an important key in understanding the tree of knowledge of Indian philosophy. This method has been explored by sages and writers since classical times as an integral part of the discussion of darśana. However, this method does not seem to have been adopted in learning Hindu philosophy in Indonesia. This research is a text study that discusses the Hindu philosophy learning method described by Hindu philosophers and thinkers as a learning tool. Data obtained through literature study by examining several classical Indian philosophical texts, data analysis using Content Analysis. An important finding of this research is that the methodology of learning Hindu philosophy must begin by studying the three starting-points known as praṣṭana-trayā namely the upaniṣads, Bhagavad-gitā and the sūtra texts. Starting from the three starting-points of Vedānta (three starting-points of Vedānta) as praṣṭana-trayā namely upaniṣad, Bhagavad-gitā and Brahmā-Sūtra. In Vedanta it is called the triple cannon of Vedānta. Without following this procedure, failure will overshadow the students of philosophy. Therefore, learning praṣṭana-trayā is the starting point in an effort to understand the scientific tree of Hindu philosophy. These three starting points for learning philosophy should be adopted properly in order to improve thinking skills, reasoning skills, including improving writing, debate, argumentation and discussion skills.
References
Achari, S. R. R. (2013). Nyaya (Tarka Sastra) The Hindu System of Logic and Debate. India: Srimatham.com.
Apte, D. . (1961). UniveRśities in Ancient India. Baroda: Faculty of Education and Psychology Maharaja Sarajiran UniveRśity of Baroda.
Aryadharma, N. K. S. (2019). Vedānta & Metode Pemahaman Filsafat Hindu. Surabaya: Paramita.
Bhattacharya, A., Shenolikar, S., & Hebbani, S. (2021). Exploring the significance of Indian logic in overcoming contemporary limitations in the Indian education system. Asia Pacific Journal of Education.
Burley, M. (2017). History of Indian Philosophy (P. Bilimoria, ed.). London: Routledge.
Burton, J. (2020). Diagrams for Navya-Nyāya. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 48(2).
Edelmann, J. (2013). Hindu theology as churning the latent. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 81(2).
Edelmann, J. B. (2012). The role of hindu theology in the religion and science dialogue. Zygon, 47(3).
Freschi, E., Ciabattoni, A., Genco, F. A., & Lellmann, B. (2017). Understanding prescriptive texts: Rules and logic as elaborated by the Mīmāmsā School. Journal of World Philosophies, 2(1).
Ganeri, J. (1996). The Hindu Syllogism: Nineteenth-Century Perceptions of Indian Logical Thought. Philosophy East and West.
Guglani, A. (2019). Ānvīkṣikī of the Real from the Lens of Sāmkhya-Yoga and Nyāya Schools. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Hodgkinson, B. (2006). The Essence of Vedanta. Oxford: Eagle Editions Limited.
Kansara, N. M. (1972). Vijnanabhiksu’s Contributions to the Samkhya Thought. India: Vedanta Kesari.
Maderey, A. L. F. (2019). An overview of classical Yoga philosophy as a philosophy of embodied self-awareness. History of Indian Philosophy, (November 2017), 263–270.
Maharaj, A. (2017). Śrī Rāmakṛṣṇa’s Philosophy of Vijñāna Vedānta. International Journal of Hindu Studies, 21(1), 25–54.
Matilal, B. K. (1991). Perception: An Essay on Classical Indian Theories of Knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Matilal, B. K. (1998). The Character of Logic in India. New York: State UniveRśity of New York Press.
Matilal, B. K. (2004). Logical and Ethical Issues An : Essay on Indian Philosophy of Religion. Delh: Chronicle Books.
Murty, K. S. (1993). Vedic Hermeneutics. Delhi: Shri Lal. Bahadur Shastri Rashtriya Sanskrit Vidyapeetha New Delhi in association with Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited.
Phillips, S. H. (2011). Epistemology in Classical India: The Knowledge Sources of the Nyaya School. New York: Routledge.
Radhakrishnan, S. (1999). Indian Philosophy Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford UniveRśity Press.
Satchidānandendra, S. S. (1989). The Method of the Vedanta: A Critical Account of the Advaita Tradition. Delhi: Motilal BanaRśidass Publishers Private Limited.
Sāyaṇācārya. (1999). RgVeda Samhita Sakala Sakha Bhasya of Sāyaṇācārya (I. W. Maswinara, ed.). Surabaya: Paramita.
Schorr, J. (2018). Pramāṇa as Action: A New Look at Uddyotakara’s Theory of Knowledge. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 46(1).
Soni, J. (2019). Vidyānandin’s Discussion with the Buddhist on SvasaṃVedana, Pratyakṣa and Pramāṇa. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 47(5).
Surpi, N. K., Widiana, I. G. P. G., Wika, I. M., Avalokitesvari, N. N. A. N., & Untara, I. M. G. S. (2021). Pembelajaran Ānvīkṣikī dalam Upaya Memperkuat Bangunan Pengetahuan Hindu dan Relevansinya terhadap Pembelajaran Filsafat Hindu Dewasa in. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Institut Agama Hindu Negeri Tampung Penyang Palangka Raya, (2), 54–71.
Surpi, N. K., & Yogiswari, K. S. (2021). Medhātithi Gautama pendiri Ānvīkṣikī Par Excellence Relevansinya dengan Bidang Baru Penelitian Filsafat Hindu di Indonesia. Penelitian Agama Hindu, 5, 222–229.
Suthren Hirst, J. G. (2005). Śamkara’s Advaita Vedānta: A way of teaching. In Śamkara’s Advaita Vedānta: A Way of Teaching.
Taber, J. A., Matilal, B. K., Ganeri, J., & Tiwari, H. (2001). The Character of Logic in India. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 121(4).
Thero, L. S. (2017). Origin and Development of Indian Logic and Buddhist Logic. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 6(1).
Vidyabhusana, M. S. Chandra. (1913). Nyayasutras of Gautama (M. B. . Basu, ed.). Allahabad: Sudhindranatha Vasu.
Vidyabhusana, M. Satis Chandra. (1920). A History of Indian Logic (Ancient, Mediaeval and Modern Schools). Delhi Patna Varanasi: Motilal BanaRśidass.
Vireśvarānanda, S. (2002). Brahmā Sūtra Pengetahuan tentang Ketuhanan. Surabaya: Paramita.
Wada, T. (2001). The Analytical Method of Navya-Nyāya. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 29(5/6), 519–530.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Ni Kadek Surpi, I Ketut Ardana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
An author who publishes in the Jurnal Penelitian Agama Hindu agrees to the following terms:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.
