Signifikansi Nilai Simbol Budaya Dan Nilai Religi Pada Pemugaran Arsitektur Warisan di Pura Kentel Gumi Kabupaten Klungkung

Authors

  • I Kadek Pranajaya Institut Desain dan Bisnis Bali

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37329/jpah.v6i4.1909

Keywords:

Significance, The Value of Cultural Symbols, Religious Value, Kentel Gumi Temple Heritage Architecture

Abstract

Kentel Gumi Temple is one of the oldest temples in Bali which has its own uniqueness because there are many archaeological objects stored in the temple area. Not many people know about the unique process of Kentel Gumi Temple and the process of restoring the temple compared to other temples in Bali. This research was conducted with a qualitative exploration method to examine the significance of the values ​​of cultural symbols and religious values ​​in the process of restoring the cultural heritage architecture at the Kentel Gumi Temple. In addition, to explore the activities of preserving architectural forms and ritual values. The results of the study found that the restoration of the Kentel Gumi Temple was significant for maintaining the value of cultural symbols and religious values ​​with the discovery of many archaeological objects from the lytic tradition in the form of menhirs, as well as relics from the classical period such as the Pancer Jagat shrine which is the unit that has the greatest cultural significance value. , considering that this building unit is an early milestone in the development of Kentel Gumi temple. The presence of a bronze phallus and stone in the Meru pelinggih overlapping solas, chess advance pelinggih, ancient statues in the form of 4 (four)-faced Lord Brahma made of solid stone, pelinggih gedong statues (queen puseh), and Ganesha statues. While the religious value can be seen from the ritual procession of restoration through spiritual transfer of all buildings through a form of symbol transfer called tapakan pelinggih with a set of upakara daksina, procession of building pralines, determination of layout (nyukat), excavation work (ngaruwak), ngenteg linggih ceremony to Tawur Panyegjeg Jagat level ceremony.

 

References

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. Richardson, J.. Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. United States: Greenwood.

Bourdieu, P. (2016). Arena Produksi Kultural, Sebuah kajian Sosiologi Budaya (I. R. Muzir (ed.); keempat). Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana.

Putra, I. D., Adhika, I. M., Mantra, I. B., Dwijendra, N. K., Darma, K. A., & Satria, M. W. (2017, December). Karakter Style Arsitektur Pura Kentel Gumi Klungkung. In Seminar Nasional Sains dan Teknologi (Senastek) IV, Bali, Indonesia (pp. 1-8).

Geertz. Cilfford. (1992). Tafsir Kebudayaan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Geriya, W. (2004). Konsep Dasar, Dimensi Filosofi dan Strategi Konservasi. Kumpulan Materi Program Inovatif TOT (Training of Trainer) Konservasi Warisan Budaya Bali Dalam Pemberdayaan Lembaga Pelestarian Warisan Budaya Bali (Bali Heritage Trust). Konsep Dasar, Dimensi Filosofi dan Strategi Konservasi: Kumpulan Materi Program Inovatif TOT (Training of Trainer) Konservasi Warisan Budaya Bali Dalam Pemberdayaan Lembaga Pelestarian Warisan Budaya Bali (Bali Heritage Trust).

Juliatmika, I. W. (2010). Kajian Konservasi Pura Agung Kentel Gumi Klungkung Strategi dan implementasi. Denpasar: Universitas Udayana.

Karnanta, K. Y. (2013). Paradigma teori arena produksi kultural sastra: Kajian terhadap pemikiran Pierre Bourdieu. Jurnal Poetika, 1(1).

Mathew Miles, M. . (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif Buku Sumber Tentang Metode-metode Baru: UIP.

Saputra, I. K. P., Sudarsana, I. K., & Mahardika, I. A. W. (2019). Tradisi Nunas Kecap Mandi Di Pura Dalem Gede Desa Pakraman Galiran Di Kabupaten Bangli (Perspektif Pendidikan Agama Hindu). Jurnal Penelitian Agama Hindu, 3(4), 270-275.

Pemerintah Provinsi Bali. (2005). Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Bali No. 5, Tahun 2005 tentang Persyaratan Arsitektur Bangunan.

Piliang, Y. A. (2010). Post Realitas: Realitas Kebudayaan dalam Era Post-Metafisika. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.

Pradnyaswari, R. (2019). Strategi Konservasi Guna Mempertahankan Identitas Arsitektur Pura Situs di Desa Sibang (Pengurangan Resiko Sosial, Ekonomi, dan Arsitektural): Jurnal Arsitektur Zonasi, 2(1), 68–74.

Pranajaya, I. K. (2013). Kearifan Lokal, Etika Arsitek dan Lingkungan Menuju Harmonisasi Arsitektur Bali yang Kreatif, Estetika dan Terpadu: Proceeding Seminar Nasional, Perencanaan Dan Penataan Kawasan Terintegrasi.

Pranajaya, I. K & Dwijendra. (2021). The Domination of Cultural and Symbolic Capital in the Preservation of Temple Heritage Architecture through a Restoration Approach in Bali, Indonesia: Civil Engineering and Architecture, 9(6).

Soma, D. (2008). Kahyangan Jagat Pura Agung Kentel Gumi, Linggih Sang Hyang Reka Bhuwana Nunas Kadegdegan Jagat: Panitia Pelaksana Karya Agung Pamungkah Tawur Panca Bali Krama Panyegjeg Jaga.

Suardana, I. N. G. (2011). Figur-Figur Arsitektur Bali: Your Inspiration*Inc.

Sukawati, T. (2019). Taksu dibalik Pariwisata Bali: Denpasar: PT. Percetakan Bali.

Sutrisno & Hendar Putranto. (2009). Teori-Teori Kebudayaan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Tri Anggraini Prajnawrdhi. (2018). Ruang Sakral Pada Rumah Adat di Desa Bali Aga: In Seminar Ikatan Peneliti Lingkungan Binaan Indonesia (IPLBI) 2, C011-017.

Widnyana Sudibya. (2016). Pemugaran Pura Agung Kentel Gumi: Orti IAI Bali (Media Informasi Ikatan Arsitek Indonesia (IAI) Bali, 2(2).

Downloads

Published

05-10-2022

How to Cite

Pranajaya, I. K. . (2022). Signifikansi Nilai Simbol Budaya Dan Nilai Religi Pada Pemugaran Arsitektur Warisan di Pura Kentel Gumi Kabupaten Klungkung. Jurnal Penelitian Agama Hindu, 6(4), 238–254. https://doi.org/10.37329/jpah.v6i4.1909

Issue

Section

Articles