Ngerebeg Nini Sebagai Aktualisasi Memori dan Tindakan Kolektif Masyarakat Desa Silangjana Dalam Habitus Liturgi Agraris
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37329/jpah.v10i3.3739Keywords:
Ngerebeg Nini, Collective Memory-Action, HabitusAbstract
Ngerebeg nini has become an agrarian practice based on the socio-religious beliefs of the people of Silangjana Village, a vertical relationship with Dewi Sri, a horizontal relationship between humans and the universe, as well as other metaphysical elements. The purpose of this research is to provide an explanation regarding the nature of agrarian community actions in rituals. This research applies a qualitative method within the framework of a case study. Data collection triangulation was conducted intensively for 1 month, without any distractions. The focus of the research became more directed because the researchers employed the purposive sampling method, having already determined the informants to be interviewed, starting from the subak leader, subak members, and jro mangku. After the data was collected and accumulated, thematic data analysis was conducted, involving reading, redefinition, reinterpretation, explanation, and conclusion of empirical data synchronized with relevant paradigms. Finally, data validity was applied thru source triangulation techniques, aimed at verifying the redefinition, reinterpretation, and explanation of the research results. Ngerebeg nini as an agricultural-based ritual ceremony performed by the community in Silangjana Village, as well as a representation of agrarian rituals, can be viewed from a theoretical perspective, particularly thru the paradigms of memory and collective action. Ngerebeg nini, from the perspective of habitus, as a manifestation of the mindset and actions of the agrarian community, is consistently carried out due to the system of idea inheritance from one generation to the next. Ngerebeg nini becomes a system of liturgical-based communalism that is generative, due to the legitimacy of Hinduism and social construction.
References
Angella, M. (2016). Work, Recognition and Subjectivity: Relocating The Connection Between Work and Social Pathologies. European Journal of Social Theory, 19(3), 340-354.
Atkinson, W. (2023). Marxism Versus Bourdieu on Domination, Consciousness and Resistance: An Engagement With Burawoy On Bourdieu. Thesis Eleven, 175(1), 63-80.
Behr, H., & Shani, G. (2021). Rethinking Emancipation in a Critical IR: Normativity, Cosmology, And Pluriversal Dialogue. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 49(2), 368-391.
Burchardt, M. (2017). Diversity As Neoliberal Governmentality: Towards a New Sociological Genealogy of Religion. Social Compass, 64(2), 180-193.
Conway, C. (2018). Book Review: Hinduism: Part Two: The Dharma of India. Theological Studies, 79(1), 204-206.
Demeulenaere, E., Pasternak, S. Y., Rubinstein, D. H., Lovecraft, A. L., & Ickert-Bond, S. M. (2021). Indigenous Spirituality Surrounding Serianthes trees in Micronesia: Traditional Practice, Conservation, And Resistance. Social Compass, 68(4), 548-561.
Dickens, P. (2012). Cosmology and Society: Developing a Bourdieusian Perspective. Sociological Research Online, 17(2), 1-13.
Honneth, A. (2019). Recognition, Democracy and Social Liberty: A Reply. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 45(6), 694-708.
Kendrick, K. (2018). Does Past Religion Have a Past? Habermas, Religion, And The Sacred Complex. Critical Research on Religion, 6(3), 309-330.
Mingming, W. (2023). For Heaven-Human Conviviality: Reflections on Some ‘Ontological’ Narratives. Theory, Culture and Society, 1(1), 1-23.
Omer, A. (2020). Decolonizing Religion and The Practice of Peace: Two Case Studies From The Postcolonial World. Critical Research on Religion, 8(3), 273-296.
Purhonen, S. (2016). Generations On Paper: Bourdieu And The Critique of ‘Generationalism.’ Social Science Information, 55(1), 94-114.
Rossier, T. (2019). Prosopography, Networks, Life Course Sequences, and so on. Quantifying With Or Beyond Bourdieu?. BMS Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/ Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique, 144(1), 6-39.
Schulz, J. (2022). “Vergangenheitsbewältigung” Revisited: Distinguishing Two Paradigms Of Working Through The Past. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 50(2), 391-415.
Shoshitaishvili, B. (2020). Deep Time And Compressed Time In The Anthropocene: The New Timescape And The Value Of Cosmic Storytelling. The Anthropocene Review, 7(2), 125-137.
Song, K. S., LePage, B. A., & Fang, W. T. (2023). The Conflict Between Environmental Justice And Culture. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 19(1), 197-203.
Stolow, J., & Meyer, B. (2021). Enlightening Religion: Light And Darkness In Religious Knowledge And Knowledge About Religion. Critical Research on Religion, 9(2), 119-125.
Syme, T. (2018). The Pervasive Structure Of Society. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 44(8), 888-924.
Tarca, L. V. (2018). The Right to be Right: Recognizing The Reasons of Those Who Are Wrong. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 44(4), 412-425.
Warde, P., Robin, L., & Sorlin, S. (2017). Stratigraphy For The Renaissance: Questions of Expertise For ‘The Environment’ and ‘The Anthropocene.’ Anthropocene Review, 4(3), 246-258.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Putu Sanjaya, Putu Subawa, Luh Wantari, Putu Periyasa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
An author who publishes in the Jurnal Penelitian Agama Hindu agrees to the following terms:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.






