Brexit as Politic Discourse in Examining the Social Construction of Crisis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37329/kamaya.v8i4.4890Keywords:
Brexit, Crisis, Constructivism, RefefendumAbstract
Brexit, the United Kingdom’s decision to leave the European Union following the 2016 referendum, represents one of the most impactful political events in contemporary European history. This article aims to contribute theoretically by expanding the application of constructivism in the study of international relations, while also offering practical insights into how crisis discourse can be utilized to shape public opinion and direct national policy. Using Alexander Wendt’s constructivist approach and the method of Critical Discourse Analysis, this study demonstrates how political actors such as Boris Johnson and Nigel Farage reconstructed the meaning of the UK’s EU membership as a threat to national sovereignty. Through emotional rhetoric such as “take back control” and media support that amplified fears about immigration and foreign interference, the crisis was positioned as an existential struggle over identity and national independence. The analysis confirms that political reality is not solely determined by material structures but is shaped by socially constructed meanings through interaction, language, and identity.
References
Betti, A. (2021). Examining Brexit: Level of Analysis and Explanations. Comillas Journal of International Relations, 21, 071–089.
Carl, N., Dennison, J., & Evans, G. (2019). European but Not European Enough: An Explanation for Brexit. European Union Politics, 20(2), 282–304.
Clift, B., & Rosamond, B. (2024). Technocratic Reason in Hard Times: The Mobilisation of Economic Knowledge and the Discursive Politics of Brexit. New Political Economy, 29(6), 886–899.
Donoghue, M., & Kuisma, M. (2022). Taking Back Control of the Welfare State: Brexit, Rational-Imaginaries and Welfare Chauvinism. West European Politics, 45(1), 177–199.
Edmunds, J. (2013). Human Rights, Islam and the Failure of Cosmopolitanism. Ethnicities, 13(6), 671–688.
Finnemore, M., & Wendt, A. (2024). When “Old” Constructivism Was New: Reflections on Classical Constructivism. Perspectives on Politics, 22(4), 1248–1268.
Haydock, J. (2023). The Use of Political Narratives to Legitimise Domination and Exclusion: A Critical Analysis Relating to Asylum Seekers in Post-Brexit United Kingdom [Thesis, Open Access Te Herenga Waka-Victoria University of Wellington].
Martill, B., & Rogstad, A. (2024). A Debate of the Highest Order: The Brexit Referendum as Second-Order Role Contestation. Foreign Policy Analysis, 20(3), orae013.
Mattlin, M. (2021). Anarchy Is What Students Make of It: Playing Out Wendt’s Three Cultures of Anarchy. Journal of Political Science Education, 17(sup1), 226–236.
Milstein, B. (2021). Justification Crisis: Brexit, Trump, and Deliberative Breakdown. Political Theory, 49(4), 554–583.
Norman, K. P. (2024). Leveraging Selective State Capacity: Understanding Changing Responses to Migration and Refugees. Journal of Global Security Studies, 9(3), ogae025.
Ogunbanjo, M. A. (2021). Neo-Realism and Neo-Liberalism in Global Politics: Towards Assessing the Intellectual Siblings. NIU Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2), 57–76.
O’Reilly, J., Froud, J., Warhurst, C., Morgan, G., Grey, C., Wood, G., Boyer, R., Frerichs, S., Rona-Tas, A., Le Galès, P., Johal, S., Williams, K., Wright, M., & Sankari, S. (2016). Brexit: Understanding the Socio-Economic Origins and Consequences. Socio-Economic Review, 14(4), 807–854.
Pencheva, D., & Maronitis, K. (2018). Fetishizing Sovereignty in the Remain and Leave Campaigns. European Politics and Society, 19(5), 526–539.
Putra, B. A. (2023). International Relations and the Concentric Hermeneutic Circle: Wendt’s Constructivism and the Inevitability of Circular Interpretations. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2), 2272325.
Saeid Abadi, M. R., & Mohammadpour, S. (2020). Brexit and the English School of International Relations: A Theoretical Study. World Sociopolitical Studies, 4(2).
Sîrbu, A., Goglia, D., Kim, J., Magos, P. M., Pollacci, L., Spyratos, S., Rossetti, G., & Iacus, S. M. (2024). International Mobility Between the UK and Europe Around Brexit: A Data-Driven Study. Journal of Computational Social Science, 7(2), 1451–1482.
Tamsin Parnell. (2023). Constructing British and European Identities in Brexit Britain: A Critical Linguistic Analysis of Press, Political, and Personal Discourses [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Nottingham.
Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391–425.
Zauzah, N. Z. (2023). Analyzing Alexander Wendt’s Statements Regarding “Anarchy Is What the State Makes It.” SIYAR Journal, 4(1), 45–58.
Zeli, A. (2024). Postmodern International Relations: Postmodernism Beyond Social Constructivism. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research Studies, 04(08).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kamaya: Jurnal Ilmu Agama
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
An author who publishes in the Kamaya : Jurnal Ilmu Agama agrees to the following terms:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.
