Manipulation Of Expressive Symbol At Hindus Religious Practices In Mataram City

Authors

  • I Wayan Ardhi Wirawan Sekolah Tinggi Agama Hindu Negeri Gde Pudja Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37329/kamaya.v3i1.375

Keywords:

Manipulation, Expressive Symbols, Religious Practices, Hindu Community

Abstract

This study aims to conduct a study of the manipulation of expressive symbol at Hindus religious practices in Mataram city, West Nusa Tenggara. The design of this research is interpretive descriptive by focusing on case studies the mechanism of manipulation expressive symbols at Hindu community. Based on the results of the study found that the mechanism of manipulation expressive symbol begins with cultural adaptation and reinterpretation of a number symbols used as a medium to realize the Vedic teachings. The mechanism of manipulation expressive symbol in this research systematic flow through at four domains, namely cultural adaptation of Hindus religious practices in the realm of expressive symbols, the synergization of expressive symbols in responding the development of science and technology, the representation of expressive symbol contestation in the dynamics of Hindu civilization, as well as the reproduction and reproduction of expressive symbols in Hindus religious practice.

References

Andang, A. (1998). Agama Yang Berpijak Dan Berfihak. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Barker, C. (2004). Cultural studies, Teori Dan Praktek. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Kencana.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Great Britain.
Fashri, F. (2007). Penyingkapan Kuasa Simbol; Apropriasi Reflektif Pemikiran Pierre Bourdieu. Yogyakarta: Juxtapose.
Frey, A. F. dan J. . (2009). Wawancara Seni Ilmu Pengetahuan” dalam buku Handbook of Qualitative Research (N. . D. dan Y. . Lincoln, Ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Garna, J. K. (1992). Teori-Teori Perubahan Sosial. Bandung: PPs-Universitas Padjadjaran.
Geertz, C. (2001). Agama Sebagai Sistem Kebudayaan” dalam buku Dekontruksi Kebenaran Kritik Tujuh Teori Agama. Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD.
Harker, Richad, C. M. dan C. W. (1990). Posisi Teoritis Dasar” dalam buku (habitus Modal) + Ranah = Praktik. Pengantar Paling Komprehensif Kepada Pemikiran Pierre Bourdieu. Yogyakarta: Jala Sutra.
Irwan Abdullah. (2006). Konstruksi dan Reproduksi Kebudayaan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Kartono. (1990). Pengantar Metodologi Riset Sosial. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Koentjaraningrat. (2003). Pengantar Antropologi I. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Kumbara, A. A. N. A. (2004). Etnisitas dan Kebangkitan Kembali Politik Aliran pada Era Reformasi: Perspektif Teoritis”. dalam Buku Politik Kebudayaan dan Identitas Etnik. Denpasar: Fakultas Sastra Unud dan Balimangsi.
Nawawi, H. (1983). Metode Penelitian Bidang Sosial. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
Piliang, Y. A. (2005). Transpolitika. Bandung: Jalasura.
Sanderson, S. . (2003). Makro Sosiologi. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Tobroni, S. I. dan. (2001). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial-Agama. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Triguna, I. B. . (2001). Redifinisi Simbolisme Masyarakat Hindu Di Bali (Laporan Penelitian). Denpasar.
Wirawan, I. W. (2006). Dinamika dalam Sistem Simbol Kegamaan pada Komunitas Hindu di Kota Mataram, Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat. Universitas Udayana.
Yin, R. K. (2004). Studi Kasus, Desain & Metode. Jakarta: Jakarta.

Downloads

Published

14-01-2020

How to Cite

Ardhi Wirawan, I. W. (2020). Manipulation Of Expressive Symbol At Hindus Religious Practices In Mataram City. Kamaya: Jurnal Ilmu Agama, 3(1), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.37329/kamaya.v3i1.375

Issue

Section

Articles