Reorientasi Dikotomis Ilmu Agama dan Umum Melalui Pendekatan Analisis Bibliometrik
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37329/kamaya.v7i2.3219Keywords:
Bibliometrics, General Sciences, Religion, ReorientationAbstract
In a world where technology is rapidly advancing, religion is often overshadowed by the growing emphasis on general science. This has led to a widening gap between religious studies and general science. This research aims to bridge this gap and challenge the dichotomy between religious and general sciences through a bibliometric analysis. Using a bibliometric approach, the study explores existing literature to identify gaps in research. Data was gathered from 500 articles sourced from Google Scholar through the Publish or Perish (PoP) tool, focusing on publications from 2014 to 2024. The analysis utilized VOSViewer for mapping and Microsoft Word for basic analysis. The findings reveal a significant increase in studies addressing the dichotomy between religious and general sciences over the last decade. The majority of publications are from e-journals, with 359 articles, while e-books accounted for 100 publications. The research also identifies seven key researchers in this field, including Hasan Baharun, Bashori, Afiful Ikhwan, Istikomah, Mujibor Rohman & Miftahur Rohman, Tabrani ZA, and Muhamad Khoirul Umam, with each contributing at least three publications, except Mujibor Rohman, who has one. The VOSViewer analysis identified three clusters within the research development: Cluster 1 with eight items, Cluster 2 with six items, and Cluster 3 with five items. The most common keywords found were "general science," "pesantren," and "Islamic religious education." This study highlights the growing interest in bridging religious and general sciences and suggests a need to reorient perspectives to address the imbalance.
References
Abidin, A. Z., & Busro. (2023). Agama, Filsafat, dan Ilmu Pengetahuan: Analisis Bibliometrik pada Database Dimension dalam Peredaran Tahun 2013-2022. Gunung Djati Conference Series (GDCS), 165–180.
Ahmad, S., Alatefi, M., Alkahtani, M., Anwar, S., Sharaf, M., & Abdollahian, M. (2019). Bibliometric Analysis for Process Capability Research. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 16(4), 459–477.
Amiruddin, M. F., & Dian. (2021). Integrasi Keilmuan Pesantren: Studi Korelasi Antara Ilmu Agama dan Ilmu Umum di Pondok Pesantren Nurul Huda Yaspin. Al-Hasanah: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 6(2), 157–169.
Asyari, A., & Makruf, R. B. (2014). Dikotomi Pendidikan Islam: Akar Historis dan Dikotomisasi Ilmu. EL-HIKMAH: Jurnal Kajian Dan Penelitian Pendidikan Islam, 8(2), 1–17.
Ayu, A. W., & Anwar, A. (2024). Integrasi Ilmu Agama dengan Ilmu Pengetahuan Umum (Islamisasi Ilmu). JIIP: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(3), 2392–2397.
Azizah, N. (2018). Hubungan Ilmu dan Agama dalam Prespektif Islam Telaah Pemikiran Kuntowijoyo. Prosiding Integrasi Interkoneksi Islam Dan Sains, 151–156.
Basri, H. (2019). Teologi Sains, Mengatasi Dikotomi Sains-Agama Perspektif Islam. Zawiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 5(2), 377–404.
Bowen, M. L., & Owen, M. (2019). A Multi-Religious Response to The Migrant Crisis in Europe: A Preliminary Examination of Potential Benefits of Multi-Religious Coorpertion on The Integration of Migrants. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45(1), 21–41.
Cooney, K. (2013). Religious Freedom in Japan: Research Needs in History and Social Science. The Review of Faith & International Affairs, 11(2), 74–81.
Dahl, K., Deutsch, N. N., Klingenberg, M., Kontala, J., Sztajer, S., & Mussel, A. (2019). Religious Socialization of Non-Religious University Students. Religion, 49(2), 262–283.
Ehrenpreis, M., & Sugrim, S. (2024). eBook Management in Ex Libris’ Alma: A Tale of Two Workflows. The Serials Librarian, 85.
Essabane, K., Sterkens, C., & Vermeer, P. (2023). The Relationship Between Islamic Religious Education and Citizenship in Liberal Democracies. Religious Education, 118(4), 297–311.
Faiz, A. (2020). Pendidikan Nilai dan Karakter dalam Perspektif Pendidikan Umum di Perguruan Tinggi. SOSIO RELIGI: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Umum, 18(2), 1–7.
Faruk, M., Ismail, R., & Mahmud, H. Moh. N. (2023). Dikotomi Ilmu dalam Pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 9(4), 310–320.
Fischer, R. (2021). Mapping The Scientific Study of Rituals: A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Published 2000-2020. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 11(4), 382–402.
Freathy, R., & John, H. C. (2019). Religious Education, Big Ideas and The Study of Religion(s) and Worldview(s). British Journal of Religious Education, 41(1), 27–40.
Freathy, R., Parker, S. G., Schweitzer, F., & Simojoki, H. (2014). Towards International Comparative Research on The Professionalisation of Religious Education. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 35(2), 225–241.
Guilfoyle, L., Erduran, S., & Park, W. (2021). An Investigation Into Secondary Teacher’s Views of Argumentation in Science and Religious Education. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 42(2), 190–204.
Hariyati, M., & Fistiyanti, I. (2017). Sejarah Klasifikasi Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman dan Perkembangannya dalam Ilmu Perpustakaan. Pustakaloka, 9(1), 147–164.
Harrington, M., Pascale, C., & Song, X. (2016). Making The Unseen Seen: Discovering Discrepancies and Shedding Light on Automated E-Resource Reconciliation. Serials Review, 42(3), 229–233.
He, J. (2016). Compilation of Local Chronicles and New Directions in Research of Chines Religious History. Studies in Chinese Religions, 2(1), 1–17.
Hermisson, S., Gochyyev, P., & Wilson, M. (2019). Assessing Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Religious and Worldview Diversity-Development and Validation of a Nuanced Measurement Instrument. British Journal of Religious Education, 41(4), 371–387.
Huda, A. A. S., & Syahidin. (2024). Menelaah Peluang Perkembangan Pendidikan Islam Indonesia di Masa Depan Melalui Analisis Bibliometrik. Al-Hikmah: Jurnal Agama Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan, 21(1), 41–52.
Irawan, D., & Putra, R. S. (2022). Integrasi Ilmu Pengetahuan: Kajian Interdisipliner, Multidisipliner dan Transdisipliner Ilmu Pendidikan Islam Kontemporer. ATTAQWA: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Islam, 18(1), 132–140.
Jacobson, H. L., Hall, M. E. L., Anderson, T. L., & Willingham, M. M. (2016). Religious Beliefs and Experiences of The Body: An Extension of The Development Theory of Embodiment. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 19(1), 52–67.
John, K. St. (2016). Digitization of The Journal Legacy: Improving Access and Literature Research Potential. Journal of Geoscience Education, 64(3), 157–158.
Kardi, Natsir, N. F., & Haryanti, E. (2022). Tipologi Integrasi Ilmu Agama dalam Pemikiran Islam Kontemporer. JIIP: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(1), 201–206.
Kinney, J. M., Ishler, K. J., Pargament, K. I., & Cavanaugh, J. C. (2003). Coping with The Uncontrollable: The Use of General and Religious Coping by Caragivers to Spouses with Dementia. Journal of Religious Gerentology, 14(2–3), 171–188.
Kirik, C. M., & Lewis, R. K. (2013). The Impact of Religious Behaviours on The Health and Well-Being of Emerging Adults. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 16(10), 1030–1043.
Krech, V. (2012). Religious Contacts in Past and Present Times: Aspects of a Research Programme. Religion, 42(2), 191–213.
Larasati, N. (2020). Integrasi Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Ilmu Agama. JPA: Jurnal Penelitian Agama, 21(1), 113–124.
Lazarev, V. S., Safonenko, O. K., & Yunusova, D. A. (2001). Bibliometric Resarch of International Scientific Conference Proceedings in The Context of The Current Objective of Library and Information Service. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Information Supply, 11(4), 103–118.
Lee, J. J. (2022). Religious Exclusivism and Mass Beliefs about The Religion v. Science Debate: A Cross-National Study. International Journal of Sociology, 52(3), 229–252.
Lee, K. H., & Woo, H. (2013). Stressors, Social Support, Religious Practice, and General Well-Being Among Korean Adult Immigrants. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 10(5), 421–434.
McLeod, J. (2015). Reading Qualitative Research. European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling, 17(2), 194–205.
Murtadlo, G., Pranada, A. R., Hidayati, A., Fransiska, D., Ananda, N. B., & Sari, P. A. (2023). Integrasi Pembelajaran Al-Qur’an Hadits Dalam Konteks Sains dan Ilmu Sosial. PANDU: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Dan Pendidikan Umum, 1(1), 35–43.
Nadyrshin, T. (2020). Religious Education in Russia: Factor of Non-Religious Parents’ Choice. British Journal of Religious Education, 42(3), 285–297.
Nasution, K. B. (2022). Integrasi Ilmu Agama dan Umum Sebuah Konsep Pendidikan Islam Ideal di Madrasah Aliyah Islamiyah Sunggal Medan. Book Chapter of Proceedings Journey-Liaison Academia and Society (BCoPJ-LAS), 1(1), 308–317.
Newton, A. T., & McIntosh, D. N. (2009). Associations of General Religiousness and Specific Religious Beliefs with Coping Appraisals in Response to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 12(2), 129–146.
Nous, R. A. (2015). Go, Team! Using Teams to Manage Electronic Resources. Serials Review, 41(4), 234–241.
Ritonga, H. B. (2019). Hubungan Ilmu dan Agama Ditinjau dari Perspektif Islam. Al-Maqasid: Jurnal Ilmu Kesyariahan Dan Keperdataan, 5(1), 55–68.
Rizal, S., Nasir, M., & Pratiwi, I. (2023). Dikotomi Ilmu Pengetahuan dalam Islam Perspektif al-Ghazali. LENTERA: Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Islamic Studies, 5(2), 122–150.
Rowlands, J., & Wright, S. (2022). The Role of Bibliometric Research Assessment in a Global Order of Epistemic Injustice: A Case Study of Humanities Research in Denmark. Critical Studies in Education, 63(5), 572–588.
Ruggiero, S. A. (2020). The Relationship Between Americans’ Spiritual/Religious Beliefs and Behaviors and Mental Health: New Evidence from the 2016 General Social Survey. Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health, 22(1), 30–48.
Salamuddin, Helmi, N., Sitorus, N., & Sofian, S. (2023). Epistemologi Ilmu Menurut Paradigma Wahdatul Ulum. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 9(3), 463–472.
Samrin. (2013). Dikotomi Ilmu dan Dualisme Pendidikan. Al-Ta’dib: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Kependidikan, 6(1), 189–198.
Sarbaini, A., Natsir, N. F., & Haryanti, E. (2022). Integrasi “Ilmu dan Agama” sebagai Islamisasi Ilmu Pengetahuan. Ri’ayah: Jurnal Sosial Dan Keagamaan, 7(1), 85–95.
Sparling, A. (2021). Making Up The Difference: Using Custom Reporting to Identify Metadata Inaccuracies in Link Resolver Serial Metadata. Serials Review, 47(3–4), 114–118.
Stewart, D.-L. (2022). Performing Googness in Qualitative Research Methods. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 35(1), 58–70.
Sufyan, A., & Irwan. (2022). Agama VS Ilmu Agama: Sebuah Pembacaan Teori Epistemologis Abdul Karim Soroush. Tajdid: Jurnal Pemikiaran Keislaman Dan Kemanusiaan, 6(1), 14–21.
Susilawati. (2022). Menuju Integrasi Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman dengan Imu-ilmu Umum (Integratif Antara Kajian yang Bersumber Ayat-ayat Qauliyah dan Ayat-ayat Kauniyah). Cross-Border, 5(1), 939–954.
Tutelman, P. R., & Webster, F. (2020). Qualitative Research and Pain: Current Controversies and Future Directions. Canadian Journal of Pain, 4(3), 1–5.
Wafa, A., & Hadi, N. (2020). Dikotomi Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Implikasinya dalam Pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Ahsana Media: Jurnal Pemikiran, Pendidikan Dan Penelitian Ke-Islaman, 6(1), 41–50.
Waheed, M., Kaur, K., Ain, N., & Sanni, S. A. (2015). Emotional Attachment and Multidimensional Self-Efficacy: Extension of Innovation Diffusion Theory in The Context of eBook Reader. Behaviour & Information Technology, 34(12), 1147–1159.
Wedell, K. (2010). Evaluating The Impact of The Hampshire Agreed Syllabus: “Living Difference” on Teaching and Learning in Religious Education. British Journal of Religious Education, 32(2), 147–161.
Wells, D., & Sallenbach, A. (2023). Print Books and Ebooks: The New Equilibrium in an Academic Library. Journal of The Australian Library and Information Association, 72(2), 166–177.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Kamaya: Jurnal Ilmu Agama
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
An author who publishes in the Kamaya : Jurnal Ilmu Agama agrees to the following terms:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.
