Dialektika Hegel Kekhalifahan Umayyah Sebagai Pencegah Radikalisasi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37329/kamaya.v7i1.3068Keywords:
Dialektika, Umayyah, Pencegahan, RadikalismeAbstract
The background to this research is the discourse on Islamic history which is often monopolized to produce a single narrative regarding the history of a great and majestic Islamic civilization unlike today. This is often used as an argument for why we have to return to the time of the prophet and the caliphate, which led to radicalization, especially of young people, to restore the caliphate in Indonesia. Why are young people easily radicalized? What historical scholarship can be used to counter it? and What is the history of Islamic civilization that was not radicalized? The answer to this question is about the internal and external problems faced by today's young people, especially students. The way to overcome this is through critical and creative thinking as in the 2023 Merdeka Curriculum. This research aims to provide history teachers with a role in preventing radicalization through historical scholarship, namely the Hegel Dialectic, especially the history of Islamic civilization. This article uses qualitative research with the literature study method. This research analyzes the reasons why young people who are often targets of radicalization by terrorist groups become their members by comparing the present with the "past glories" of Islamic civilization. Hegel's dialectic is a way to discuss complex topics by showing two different points of view of Thesis and Antithesis so as to achieve a broader understanding of Synthesis. This technique can prevent students from becoming radicalized because they don't immediately believe something before checking it themselves. Hegel's dialect is a means of contracting radicalism discourse using historical science as its basis.
References
Asrori, A. (2015). Radikalisme di Indonesia. Kalam: Jurnal Studi Agama Dan Pemikiran Islam, 9(2), 253–268.
Azca, M. N. (2013). Yang Muda, Yang Radikal: Refleksi Sosiologi Terhadap Fenomena Radikalisme Kaum Muda Muslim di Indonesia Pasca Orde Baru. Maarif: Arus Pemikiran Islam Dan Sosial, 8(1), 14–45.
Cobb, P. M. (2011). The Empire in Syria. In C. F. Robinson (Ed.), The New Cambrigde History of Islam Volume 1 the Formation of the Islamic World Sixth to Eleventh Centuries (1st ed., Vol. 1, pp. 226–268). Cambridge University Press.
Dewi, F. (2015). Proyek Buku Digital: Upaya peningkatan keterampilan abad 21 calon guru sekolah dasar melalui model pembelajaran berbasis proyek. Metodik Didaktik: Jurnal Pendidikan Ke-SD-An, 9.
Dixon, A. A. A. (1971). he Umayyad Caliphate 65-86/684-705 (A Political Study). (S. Austin, Ed.). Luzac & Co.
Djait, H. (1971). La Wilaya d’Ifriqiya au Ile/Vile siecle: Etude institutionnelle. Studia Islamica, 27, 77–121.
Donner, F. M. (2021). Living Together Social Perception and Changing Interactions of Arabian Believers and other Religious Communities During the Umayyad Period. In A. Marsham (Ed.), The Umayyad World (pp. 23–38). Routledge.
Fanani, A. F. (2013). Fenomena Radikalisme di Kalangan Kaum Muda. Maarif: Arus Pemikiran Islam Dan Sosial, 8(1), 4–14.
Fenwick, C. (2021). The Umayyad and North Africa: Imperial Rule and Frontier Society. In A. Marsham (Ed.), The Umayyah World (pp. 293–313). Routledge.
Genequand, D. (2021). Elites in The Countryside: The Economic and Political Factors Behind the Umayyad “Dessert Castle”. In A. Marsham (Ed.), The Umayyad World (pp. 240–266). Routledge.
Ghifari, I. F. (2017). Radikalisme di Internet. Religious: Jurnal Agama Dan Lintas Budaya, 1(2), 123–134.
Hagemann, H. L, & Verkinderen, P. (2021). Kharijism in the Umayyad Period. In A. Marsham (Ed.), The Umayyad World (pp. 489–517). Routledge.
Hawtling, G. R. (2000). The First Dynasty of Islam: The Umayyad Caliphate AD 661-750. (2nd ed.). Routledge.
ibn Khayyat, K. (2015). Khalifa ibn Khayyat’s History on the Umayyad Dynasty (660-750) (C. Wurtzel, Ed.; Vol. 63). Liverpool University Press.
Kuntowijoyo. (1995). Pengantar Ilmu Sejarah. Tiara Wacana.
Legendre, M. (2021). Aspect of Umayyad Administration. In A. Marsham (Ed.), The Umayyad World (pp. 133–157). Routledge.
Mabra, J. (2017). Princely Authority in the Early Marwanid State: The Life of Abdul Aziz ibn Marwan. Georgia Press.
Marsham, A. (2021). Introduction the Umayyad World. In A. Marsham (Ed.), The Umayyad World (pp. 1–22). Routledge.
Muchith, M. S. (2016). Radikalisme Dalam Dunia Pendidikan. ADDIN, 10(1), 172–180.
Qodir, Z. (2013). Perspektif Sosiologi Tentang Radikalisasi Agama Kaum Muda. Maarif: Arus Pemikiran Islam Dan Sosial, 8(1), 45–66.
Razali, M. I. (2012). Menuju Roh Mutlak: Gagasan Hegel Tentang Sejarah. In UKM (Ed.), Seminar Ilmuwan Muda ASASI (pp. 1–7). Puri Pujangga.
Robinson, C. (2005). Abdul Malik. Oneworld Publications.
Robinson, C. F. (2011). The Rise of Islam 600-705. In C. F. Robinson (Ed.), The New Cambridge History of Islam Volume 1 the Formation of Islamic World Sixth to Eleventh Centuries (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, M. (2021). Qurashi Marriage and the Roots of Revolts: the rebellion of Abdullah bin Muawiyah, 744-747. In A. Marsham (Ed.), The Umayyad World. Routledge.
Rohani, F. F. S., Ernita, M., & Zastrahadi, M. F. (2022). Metode Analisis Dialektika Hegel Untuk Meningkatkan Berfikir Kritis Dan Kreatif Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Ilmu Pendidikan Sosial. Tsaqifa Nusantara, 1(1), 29–50.
Sahrasad, H., & Al Chaidar. (2017). Fundamentalisme, Terorisme dan Radikalisme perspektif atas Agama, Masyarakat dan Negara. Freedom Foundation & CSS-UI.
Sukabdi, Z. A. (2013). Kaum Muda dan Raadikalisme ? Maarif: Arus Pemikiran Islam Dan Sosial, 8(1), 82–96.
Thoyyib, M. (2018). Radikalisme Islam Indonesia. TA’LIM: Jurnal Studi Pendidikan Islam, 1(1), 90–105.
Zatrahadi, M. F., Darmawati, D., & Yusra, N. N. (2021). he Effect of Online Game Addiction on Adjustment Social ini Adolescents. . Jurnal Inspiratif Pendidika, 5(2), 274–285.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Kamaya: Jurnal Ilmu Agama
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
An author who publishes in the Kamaya : Jurnal Ilmu Agama agrees to the following terms:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.
