Ekofeminisme Chipko Movement, Interkonektivitas Dengan Gerakan Saput Poleng di Bali sebagai Operasionalisasi Pelestarian Alam Berbasis Ibuisme Dalam Kosmologi Hindu

Authors

  • Putu Maria Ratih Anggraini Sekolah Tinggi Agama Hindu Negeri Mpu Kuturan Singaraja
  • I Nyoman Suka Ardiyasa Sekolah Tinggi Agama Hindu Negeri Mpu Kuturan Singaraja

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37329/jpah.v9i2.4027

Keywords:

Chipko Movement, Saput Poleng, Mother Earth, Cosmology

Abstract

The Chipko Movement represents an ecological movement initiated by a group of Indian women, driven by the activities of forest environmental destruction. This effort then transformed into an environmental advocacy movement. This practice has the same linearity as the Balinese Hindu community. The way to implement the local community's version of cosmology is through saput poleng (a black-and-white cloth) and the internalization of the Mother Earth concept. The aim of this research is to analyze environmental preservation initiated by local movements, thereby contributing to ecological practices. This research applies the method of intertextuality by analyzing the Chipko Movement and saput poleng. Chipko Movement is interpreted as an affirmation of women as individuals who share responsibility in preserving the environment. This reality is seen from the consistency in protecting forest areas from logging activities. This movement is also implemented in actions to preserve land and forests, as forests and land are considered substantive components of society. The Chipko Movement represents a form of social struggle by the local population, which then transformed into ecological awareness to protect forest areas. The movement has a correlation with saput poleng in Bali, as a way to protect vital areas such as forests by wrapping cloth with circular patterns, with the aim of preserving the ecosystem as a central arena in human life. Wrapping the linear saput poleng with a vision of environmental preservation based on matrilineal principles, emphasizing that women become agents with an extension as tummerfrauen. In conclusion, the Chipko Movement and saput poleng, with differentiated loci, share the same typology, namely associating nature as the personification of mother.

References

Behr, H., & Shani, G. (2021). Rethinking Emancipation In A Critical IR: Normativity, Cosmology, And Pluriversal Dialogue. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 49(2), 368-391.

Bond, C. G. (2018). Ecofeminist Epistemology in Vandana Shiva’s The Feminine Principle of Prakriti and Ivone Gebara’s Trinitarian Cosmology. Feminist Theology, 26(2), 185-194.

Borsos, D. C. (2015). Communicative Prajna: Cultivating Solidarity and Establishing Right Human Relations. International Communication Gazette, 77(5), 500-515.

Bridge, G. (2020). Habit, Experience and Environment: A Pragmatist Perspective. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 38(2), 345-363.

Brighenti, A. M. (2018). The Social Life of Measures: Conceptualizing Measure-Value Environments. Theory, Culture and Society, 35(1), 23-44.

Chigangaidze, R. K. (2023). The Environment Has Rights: Eco-Spiritual Social Work Through Ubuntu Philosophy And Pachamama: A Commentary. International Social Work, 66(4), 1059-1063.

Conway, C. (2018). Book Review: Hinduism: Part Two: The Dharma of India. Theological Studies, 79(1), 204-206.

Dalal, A. (2019). Explicating Environmental Patriarchy: An Examination Through Gender and Environment Perspectives. ANTYAJAA: Indian Journal of Women and Social Change, 4(2), 145-157.

Dash, D. K. (2021). Diverse And Contra-Sectional Subjectivities in Social Movement Unionism: A Study of Chhattisgarh Mukti Morcha (Mazdoor Karyakarta Samiti). Sociological Bulletin, 70(1), 76-93.

Demeulenaere, E., Pasternak, S. Y., Rubinstein, D. H., Lovecraft, A. L., & Bond, S. M. I. (2021). Indigenous Spirituality Surrounding Serianthes Trees in Micronesia: Traditional Practice, Conservation, and Resistance. Social Compass, 68(4), 548-561.

Desai, B. H., & Mandal, M. (2021). Role of Climate Change in Exacerbating Sexual and Gender-Based Violence Against Women: A New Challenge For International Law. Environmental Policy and Law, 51(3), 137-157.

Dogra, B. (2018). Book Review: Subhash Sharma, Why People Protest: An Analysis of Ecological Movements. Social Change, 48(1), 164-165.

Haraway, D. (2018). Staying With The Trouble for Multispecies Environmental Justice. Dialogues in Human Geography, 8(1), 102-105.

Hernandez, K. J., Rubis, J. M., Theriault, N., Todd, Z., Mitchell, A., Country, B., Burarrwanga, L., Ganambarr, R., Stubbs, M. G., Ganambarr, B., Maymuru, D., Pearson, S. S., Lloyd, K., & Wright, S. (2021). The Creatures Collective: Manifestings. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 4(3), 838-863.

Hrynkow, C. (2018). Situating Earth Democracy: Vandana Shiva on Agroecology, Contemporary Politics and Resilience. Political Studies Review, 16(3), 205-216.

Kumar, R. (2017). Padayatras and the Changing Nature of Political Communication in India. Studies in Indian Politics, 5(1), 32-41.

Lewis, T. E., & Owen, J. (2020). Posthuman Phenomenologies: Performance Philosophy, Non-Human Animals, and the Landscape. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(5), 472-478.

Lozano, P. P. (2023). History And Philosophy Of Geography I: Heterodox Progress, Critical Scepticism And Intellectual Voluminosity. Progress in Human Geography, 47(3), 447-459.

Mingming, W. (2023). For Heaven-Human Conviviality: Reflections on Some ‘Ontological’ Narratives. Theory, Culture and Society, 1(1), 1-23.

Nayak, A. K. (2015). Environmental Movements in India. Journal of Developing Societies, 31(2), 249-280.

Paul, K. B. (2017). Introducing Interpretive Approach of Phenomenological Research Methodology in Environmental Philosophy: A Mode of Engaged Philosophy in the Anthropocene. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1-10.

Ritts, M., & Bakker, K. (2022). New Forms: Anthropocene Festivals and Experimental Environmental Governance. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 5(1), 125-145.

Schonher, M. (2019). Gilles Deleuze’s Philosophy of Nature: System and Method in What is Philosophy?. Theory, Culture and Society, 36(7-8), 89-107.

Sheldrake, M. (2020). The ‘Enigma’ of Richard Schultes, Amazonian Hallucinogenic Plants, and The Limits of Ethnobotany. Social Studies of Science, 50(3), 345-376.

Singh, P. (2022). Book Review: Shekhar Pathak, The Chipko Movement: A People’s History. Studies in Indian Politics, 10(2), 298-299.

Song, K. S., LePage, B. A., & Fang, W. T. (2023). The Conflict Between Environmental Justice And Culture. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 19(1), 197-203.

Sun, J., Li, G., Wang, Q., & Zhang, B. (2020). Ecological Environments of Tropical and Subtropical Regions in China. Tropical Conservation Science, 13(50), 1-4.

Vasan, S. (2018). Ecological Crisis and the Logic of Capital. Sociological Bulletin, 67(3), 275-289.

Veldhuis, D., Tejsner, P., Riede, F., Hoye, T. T., & Willerslev, R. (2019). Arctic Disequilibrium: Shifting Human-Environmental Systems. Cross-Cultural Research, 53(3), 243-251.

Wang, J., Yu, C. W., & Cao, S. J. (2022). Planning for Sustainable and Ecological Urban Environment: Current Trends and Future Developments. Indoor and Built Environment, 32(4), 627-631.

Warde, P., Robin, L., & Sorlin, S. (2017). Stratigraphy For The Renaissance: Questions of Expertise for ‘The Environment’ and ‘The Anthropocene.’ Anthropocene Review, 4(3), 246-258.

Wöhrer, V. (2016). Gender Studies As A Multi-centred Field? Centres and Peripheries in Academic Gender Research. Feminist Theory, 17(3), 323-343.

Zhao, K., Guo, J., Ma, Z., & Wu, W. (2023). Exploring the Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity and Stationarity in the Relationship Between Street Vitality and Built Environment. SAGE Open, 13(1), 1-22.

Downloads

Published

23-03-2025

How to Cite

Anggraini, P. M. R. ., & Suka Ardiyasa, I. N. . (2025). Ekofeminisme Chipko Movement, Interkonektivitas Dengan Gerakan Saput Poleng di Bali sebagai Operasionalisasi Pelestarian Alam Berbasis Ibuisme Dalam Kosmologi Hindu. Jurnal Penelitian Agama Hindu, 9(2), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.37329/jpah.v9i2.4027

Issue

Section

Articles