Efek Tryadic Communication Pura Samuantiga Dalam Pemujaan Tri Murti Di Bali

Authors

  • I Wayan Wirta Universitas Hindu Negeri I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa Denpasar
  • Sintyananda Gayatri Universitas Hindu Negeri I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa Denpasar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37329/jpah.v0i0.1629

Keywords:

Tryadic Communication, Pura Samuantiga, The Worship Of Tri Murti

Abstract

There has been a conflict of understanding among Hindu religious groups, as a result of not adapting to the local cultural environment that has been considered well established. So as a consequence, there is a gap/conflict of understanding that has an impact on miscommunication.  The concerns of various parties, especially among traditional Hindu figures as the "opinion leader" of Hindu communities in Bali with the concept of the teachings of "Tri Murti" insist on fortifying the influences of sampradaya teachings that are considered not in line with the tradition of "Dresta Bali". The effect of tryadic communication with the concept of Tri Murti teachings and the formation of pakraman villages/Balinese customary village is a strategic effort to anticipate, fortify and overcome conflicts between Hindu Religious groups, both at the pakraman village/customary village level and the family environment in Bali. The study used “dependency theory” from Ball-Rokeach and DeFlour. The method of data collection is participatory observation, in-depth interviews and literature studies. Data processing methods are carried out through processes : reduction, display and data verivikation. While the technique of determining informants is done purposive sampling.

As for the findings of this study that the name "Pura Kahyangan Tiga" does not describe the number of appropriate temples that should amount to three in each village pakraman/customary village, but the fact in the field is different, it could be that one village pakraman/customary village has two temples (if Pura Desa/Bale Agung and Pura Puseh combined in one area) and even the number of Pura Kahyangan Tiga can be more than three pieces (if Pura Dalem Setra more than one). Therefore, it needs to be reviewed, the naming of Pura Kahyangan Tiga which is not in accordance with the concept in question. Based on this description, several conclusions can be drawn, namely : 1) Tryadic communications is “a triangular communication” (samuantiga) which in its implementation has caused the effect of Tri Murti in Bali, both at the family level, pakraman village/customary village and more broadly at Pura Sad Kahyangan for all Hindu communities in Bali. 2) The effect of tryadic communications Pura Samuantiga on the level of pakraman village/customary village was built Pura Kahyangan Tiga, which consists of : Pura Desa/Bale Agung as a place of worship of Lord Brahma, Pura Puseh as a place of worship of Lord Visnu and Pura Dalem as a place of worship of Lord Siva, as well as a unifying medium for all Hindus in the territory/territorial wewidangan pakraman village/customary village. 3) The effect of tryadic communications Pura Samuantiga on the family sphere was built Palinggih Kamulan Rong Telu/Tiga, as a medium of worship Tri Murti and the ancestral spirit of the siddhadewata, as well as a unifying media in the family sphere.

References

Ardana, I. G. (1981). Sejarah Perkembangan Hinduisme di Bali. Denpasar.

Dwiyanti, N. K. (2014). Pura Puseh di Desa Pakraman Manuaba, Tegallalang Gianyar Bali (Tinjauan Sejarah, Fungsi Pura dan Potensinya sebagai Pewarisan Nilai dalam Pembelajaran IPS Tingkat SMP Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013. Singaraja: Jurusan Pendidikan Sejarah, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.

Fiske, J. (2012). Pengantar Ilmu Komunikasi. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Kamus Bali-Indonesia Beraksara Bali dan Latin. (2013). Denpasar : Badan Pembina Bahasa, Aksara dan Sastra Bali Provinsi Bali.

Kamus Bali-Indonesia. (1996). Denpasar: Tim Penyusun.

Goris, R. (1974). Sekte-sekte di Bali. Jakarta: Bhratara.

Gunawan, D. H. (2014). Perubahan Sosial di Pedesaan Bali, Dualitas, Kebangkitan Adat dan Demokrasi Lokal. Serpong: CV. Marjin Kiri.

Mahastuti, N. M., Utami, N. W., & Wijatmaja, A. B. (2019). Manajemen Konservasi di Pariwisata Pura Desa dan Puseh, Desa Pakraman Batuan, Kecamatan Sukawati Gianyar. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Desain dan Arsitektur (Senada), Vol.2, Pebruari 2019 (pp. 483-489). Gianyar: Universitas Udaayana, Sekolah Tinggi Desain Bali dan Universitas Dwijendra.

Mantra, I. (1958). Pengertian Siwa-Buddha dalam Sejarah Indonesia. Denpasar: Institut Hindu Dharma Denpasar.

Miles, M. B., & Hubermann, A. (1992). Analisis Data Kwalitatif. Jakarta: 41 Press.

Monier, S. W. (1993). Sanskrit-English Dictionry. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

Nida, D. (2007). Sinkretisasi Siwa-Buddha di Bali, Kajian Historis Sosiologis. Denpasar: Pustaka Bali Post.

Noorsena, B., & Titib, I. M. (2001). Konsep Ketuhanan dalam Perspektif Hindu-Kristen, Makalah Dialog Agama, Mahasanti Puja di Gedung Wanita "Santi Graha". Denpasar: Institute for Syriac Christian Studies.

Oka Astawa, dkk. A. (2006). Pura Samuantiga Bedulu Gianyar. Gianyar: Pemerintah Kabupaten Gianyar dan Paruman Pura Samuantiga, Bedulu Gianyar.

Partanto, P. A., & Barry, M. D. (1994). Kamus Ilmiah Populer. Surabaya: Arkola.

Prami, A. I. (tt.). Meningkatnya Intensitas Konflik Desa Pakraman di Bali. Denpasar: Prodi Sosiologi Fakultas ilmu Sosial Politik Universitas Udayana.

Profil Pura Kahyangan Jagat di Bali. (2012). Denpasar : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Universitas Udayana.

Raka, A. G. (2010). Seribu Tahun Mpu Kuturan di Bali. Gianyar: Dinas Kebudayaan Kabupaten Gianyar.

Rakhmat, J. (2007). Psikologi Komunikasi. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Salir, P. (1995). Kamus Bahasa Indonesia Kontemporer.

Senjaya, S. D. (2007). Teori Komunikasi. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.

Setiada, N. K. (2003). Desa Adat Legian ditinjau dari Pola Desa Tradisional Bali. Jurnal Permukiman Natah,Vol.1, No.2,Juni 2003, 59-64.

Soebandi, J. M. (2003). Babad Pasek, Maha Gotra Pasek Sanak Sapta Rsi, edisi Lengkap disertai Keturunan Warga Pasek. Denpasar: PT. Pustaka Manikgeni.

Suadnyana, I. B. (tt.). Desa Pakraman sebagai Lembaga Adat dan Lembaga Agama bagi Kehidupan Masyarakat Hindu di Bali. Singaraja: STAHN Mpu Kururan Singaraja.

Suarmini, N. W. (2011). Peranan Desa Pakraman dalam Memperkuat Ketahanan Sosial Budaya melalui Konsep Ajaran Tri Hita Karana. Jhs jurnal Sosial Humaniora, Vol. 4, No.1, Juni 2011, 1-12.

Sudana, A. O. (2011). Implementasi struktur Tree pada Rancang Bangun Sistem Penelusuran sejarah Pura Kawitan dan Kahyangan Jagat Berbasis Web. lontar Komputer,Vol. 2, No. 1 Juni 2021, 69-82.

Sujamto. (2000). Reorientasi dan revitalisasi Pandangan Hidup Jawa.

Susanta, I., Laskara, I., Swanendri, N., & Suartika, G. (2018). Penataan Terintegrasi Pura Dalem Desa Gunaksa, Kecamatan Dawan, Kabupaten Klungkung. Buletin Udayana Mengabdi, Vol.17, No.4, oktober 2018, 135-140.

Wiana, I. K. (2007). Sembahyang Memuja Tuhan dengan Sembilan Bentuk Bhakti. Denpasar: Panakom.

Wirta, I. W. (2019). Pura Samuantiga : Perspektif Komunikasi Hindu (Disertasi). Denpasar: Program Pascasarjana Institut Hindu Dharma Negeri Denpasar.

Wojowasito, S., & Poerwadarminta. (1980). Kamus Lengkap Inggris-Indonesia, Indonesia Inggris dengan Ejaan Yang Disempurnakan. Bandung : Hasta.

Downloads

Published

24-01-2022

How to Cite

Wirta, I. W., & Gayatri, S. (2022). Efek Tryadic Communication Pura Samuantiga Dalam Pemujaan Tri Murti Di Bali. Jurnal Penelitian Agama Hindu, 199–219. https://doi.org/10.37329/jpah.v0i0.1629