Konstruksi Solidaritas Sosial Berbasis Ikatan Banjar Solo Timur Pada Masyarakat Hindu Di Surakarta

  • I Nyoman Suendi STHD Klaten Jawa Tengah

Abstract

The kinship system based on the Banjar bonding system is a model of social institutions that have been applied by Hindu communities in Surakarta since historical times. Social institutions are used as a vehicle to form a traditional social order. In Hindu social life the social institutions are able to expedite the process of implementing Hinduism because in it are able to realize social solidarity internally among Hindu communities in Surakarta. In connection with this matter in this study raised three problems to study the construction of social solidarity, namely (1) What is the pattern of social solidarity construction based on the Banjar bonding system in Hindu communities in Surakarta? (2) What is the mechanism of social solidarity construction based on the Banjar bond system in Hindu communities in Surakarta?

Based on observations obtained that the pattern of social solidarity construction based on the banjar bond system is related to the form of social institutions that are used as a vehicle for completing religious social activities carried out by the Hindu community in Surakarta. Social institutions were formed since the historical period, namely when in the early days of the existence of the ethnic Balinese Hindu community in Surakarta around 1970. The social system of Banjar ties was played as a vehicle to expedite the process of Hinduism, especially in the realm of the Manusa Yajna and Pitra Yajna ceremonies. The banjar bonding system is used in the implementation of manusa yajna ceremonies, such as in the implementation of marriage ceremonies, while in the implementation of pitra yajna ceremonies, especially in ceremonies relating to burial or cremation according to the Hindu religious belief system.

The mechanism of social solidarity construction based on the Banjar bonding system is based on the basic elements that form the means of forming social solidarity in the banjar bonding system such as bonds of bonds, the similarity of belief systems adopted, family ties based on marriage and similar interests. The bond of association is an emotional bond that occurs primarily in the emotions of brotherhood. The fraternity emotion starts from a sense of adimp metimpal (suitable siblings) so as to create a sense of mutual respect, compassion, fostering each other and feel the same fate and continuity.

References

Akyar, Yusuf Lubis. 2014. Postmodernisme Teori dan Metode. PT. Raja Grafinco Persada. Jakarta.
Bambang Prasetyo, Umia Maftakhul Jannah. 2005. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Teori dan Aplikasi. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta.
Ben Agger. 2003. Teori Sosial Krits. Kreasi Wacana Yogyakarta.
Bryan S. Truner. 1991. Agama & Teori Sosial. IRCISod. Yogyakarta.
C. Dewi Wulansari. 2009. Sosiologi Konsep dan Teori. Rafika Adhitama. Bandung.
Covarrubias, M. 1937. The Island of Bali. New York. Knopf.
D. Hendro Puspito OC. 1984. Sosiologi Agama. Penerbit : Kanisius. Yogyakarta.
Dept. Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Pusat Penelitian Sejarah dan Budaya. 1979/1980. Risalah Sejarah dan Budaya Seri Monografi Surakarta. Yogyakarta.
Dept. Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Pusat Penelitian Sejarah dan Budaya. 1981/1982. Risalah Sejarah dan Budaya. Yogyakarta.
Dr. Darsono Wisadirana. 2005. Sosiologi Pedesaan. Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.
Fadhillah. 2006. Kecerdasan Budaya. Padang Andalan University Press.
Hardono, Hermawan. 1994. Metodologi Penelitian Sejarah. Depdikbud Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta.
Hassan Shadily. 1993. Sosiologi Untuk Masyrakat Indonesia. PT. Rikena Cipta. Jakarta.
H. Syukriadi Sambas. 2015. Sosiologi Komunikasi. Pustaka Setia Bandung.
IB Suparta Ardhana. 2002. Sejarah Perkembangan Agama Hindu di Indonesia. Paramita. Surabaya.
IG A. G. Putra. 1998. Warhas Pathi Tattwa. Paramita. Surabaya.
I Ketut Subagiasta. 2006. Tattwa Hindu bagi Pandita dan Pemangku. Paramita. Surabaya.
I Made Sujana, I Nyoman Susila. 2000. Manggala Upacara. Dirjen Bimas Hindu dan Budha. Jakarta.
I Nengah Dana. 2008. Panca Yajna. Widya Dharma. Denpasar.
I Nyoman Yoga Sugara. 2015. Perkawinan Nyerod. PT. Saadah Pustaka Mandiri. Jakarta Selatan.
Ishomudin. 2002. Pengantar Sosiologi Agama. Ghalia Indonesia, UMM Press, Jakarta Selatan.
J. Syahban Yasasusastra. 2011. Asta Brata 8 Unsur Alam Simbol Kepemimpinan. Putaka Mahardika. Yogyakarta.
Jalaluddin Rakhmat. 2013. Psikologi Komunikasi. PT. Remaja Rosda Karya. Bandung.
Jalaluddin Rakhmat. 2010. Psikologi Komunikasi. Penerbit : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung
John Ralstone Soul, 2008. Runtunya Globalisme dan Penemuan Kembali Dunia. Putaka Pelajar. Yogyakarta.
K.J. Veeger. 1990. Realitas Sosial. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta.
Koentjaraningrat. 1977. Metode-metode Penelitian Masyarakat. PT. Gramedia. Jakarta
Koentjaraningrat. 1990. Pengantar llmu Antropologi. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Koentjaraningrat. 2002. Manusia dan Kebudayaan di Indonesia. Djambatan. Jakarta
Lexy Moleong. 2013. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. PT. Remaja Rosda Karya. Bandung.
Margaret M. Poloma. 2003. Sosiologi Kontemporer. PT. Raja Gravindo Persada. Jakarta.
Nasution. 2002. Sosiologi Pendidikan. Penerbit : Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.
Niken Tambang Raras. 2008. Mejejahitan dan Metanding. Paramita. Surabaya.
Nukning Sri Rahayu. 2016. Pura Mandira Seta Baluwarti Kraton Surakarta Pendidikan Karakter Melalui Realisasi Tri Hita Karana dan Nilai Pancasila. The Hindu Centre of Indonesia.
Nyoman S. Pendit Sri Chandra Sekharendra Saraswati. 1993. Aspek-Aspek Agama Hindu. Manikgeni Ciputat. Jakarta.
Pendit I Nyoman S. 1986. Bhagawad Gita. Balai Pustaka Dharma Nusantara. Jakarta.
Putu Setia. 1992. Cendekiawan Hindu Bicara. Yayasan Dharma Narada. Denpasar.
Pudja C. Sudharto Tjokorde Rai. 1977. Menawa Dharmasastra. CV. Yunesco. Jakarta.
Prof. Dr. Lexy J. Moleong. 2013. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. PT. Remaja Rosda Karya. Bandung.
Prof. Dr. AbdullahIdi. 2011. Sosiologi Pendidikan. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta.
Prof. Dr. Nasution. 2011. Sosiologi Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.
RB. Soemanto. 2012. Sosiologi Hukum Filsafat, Teori dan Masalah. Sebelas Maret University Press.
Soerjono Soekanto. 1982. Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar. CV. Rajawali. Jakarta.
Suyatno Kartodirdjo. 2000. “Teori dan Metodologi Sejarah dalam Aplikasinya”. Dalam Historika. No. 11 Tahun XII. Surakarta : Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Negeri Jakarta KPK Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Thomas F O’Dea. 1985. Sosiologi Agama. CV. Rajawali. Jakarta.
Tim Penyusun. 1997. Buku Pendidikan Agama Hindu Untuk Perguruan Tinggi. Hanoman Sakti. Jakarta.
Tim Penyusun. 2012. Itihasa. Dirjen Bimas Hindu Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. Jakarta.
Tim Penyusun. 2010. Sejarah Perkembangan Agama Hindu (Modul 1-7). Dirjen Bimas Hindu Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. Jakarta.
Tjok Rai Sudharta. 2010. Kumpulan Sloka Weda Suci. Widya Dharma. Denpasar.
TO Lhromi. 1984. Pokok-pokok Antropologi Budaya. PT. Gramedia. Jakarta.
Yudha Triguna, IBG. 2003. Estetika Hindu dan Pembangunan Bali. Denpasar: Widia Dharma.
Yulia Sugandi. 2002. Rekonstruksi Sosiologi Humanis Menuju Praksis. Pustaka Pelajar Offset. Yogyakarta.
Published
2019-08-17
How to Cite
Suendi, I. N. (2019). Konstruksi Solidaritas Sosial Berbasis Ikatan Banjar Solo Timur Pada Masyarakat Hindu Di Surakarta. Ganaya : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 2(2). Retrieved from http://jayapanguspress.penerbit.org/index.php/ganaya/article/view/306
Section
Articles