Nilai Pendidikan Karakter Pada Tokoh Sri Rāma Dan Hanūmān Dalam Teks Rāmāyaṇa

Authors

  • Ni Putu Ratni Institut Hindu Dharma Negeri Denpasar
  • I Ketut Donder Institut Hindu Dharma Negeri Denpasar
  • I Ketut Sudarsana Institut Hindu Dharma Negeri Denpasar http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5800-6841

Abstract

The research conducted base on the factual condition, which is delivered some phenomenons of character education implementation failure in order to form the students to be intellect and at the same time also keeping alive their nation spirit and soul;   the purposes of the research were interpreting  the answers of the research questions, which were consists of: (1) the character description of Sri Rāma and Hanūmān in the text of Rāmāyaṇa; (2) the description of character education values of Sri Rāma and Hanūmān in the text of Rāmāyaṇa; dan (3) the relevance between description of character education values of Sri Rāma and Hanūmān in the text of Rāmāyaṇa with the globalization era; some of the benefits of the research are delivering the results of study which can be used as a reference for the relevant further researches; and delivering importants points, which can be implemented in the world of formal, non-formal, and informal education system, so that the system will be able to strengthen the nation spirit and soul.   

The research conducted as qualitative research, utilized qualitative descriptive method; text analysis approach; descriptive data collection method; data collection technic of text analysis and documentation; descriptive data analysis; and qualitative descriptive of data presentation.

The results of the research had delivered some descriptions as follows: (1) the character of Sri Rāma and Hanūmān in the text of Rāmāyaṇa are presenting the great and noble characteristic figures, which are very proper to be followed by everyone; (2) the character education values, which are arising from the characteristic of Sri Rāma and Hanūmān in the text of Rāmāyaṇa, consist of 18 national character education values. Therefore, their character education values are very proper to be utilized as a media in order to deliver the material of character education subject in Indonesia; and (3) the character education values of Sri Rāma and Hanūmān in the text of Rāmāyaṇa is very relevant with the globalization era, because they have potential ability to fulfill every criterion points of character education, either in national range, or in international one. Finally, it can be concluded that the character education from Sri Rāma and Hanūmān consist of big potential to be utilized as the guidance in order to deliver character education material that will be able to form the students to be smart, intellect, competitive, yet still respect on the nation spirit and soul of Indonesia.

References

Agustin, R. (tt). Kamus Ilmiah Populer. Surabaya: Serbajaya.
Aji, W. (2013, Desember 22). Kasus Tawuran Pelajar Jakarta Terus Meningkat Tahun Ini. Retrieved Desember 2016, 2016, from Tribunnews.com: http://www.tribunnews.com/metropolitan/2013/12/22/kasus-tawuran-pelajar-jakarta-terus-meningkat-tahun-ini
Bayen, G. C. (2014). Epic Ramayana: Sociological Thought, Culture & Ancient Indian Science. Valley International Journals, 482-489.
Brooks, A. (2009). Postfeminisme & Cultural Studies: Sebuah Pengantar Paling Komprehensif. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.
Cresswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. California: Sage Publications.
Cresswell, J. W. (2016). Research Design: Pendekatan metode kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan campuran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Danim, S. (2007). Metode Penelitian untuk Ilmu-Ilmu Prilaku. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Dinghan, J. (1998). the Ramcharitmanas and Confucius. In L. P. Vyas, Ramayana; International Perspective. New Delhi: BRPC.
Donder, I Ketut (1996). Kodifikasi Veda. Kodifikasi Veda. Denpasar: Paramita.
Donder, I. (2016). Education Must consist of Character Building, Humanity, and Divine Life as the True Education. Dafis 2016 Dharma Acarya Faculty International Seminar Proceeding Book, 232-242.
Donder, I. (2016). Keseimbangan Pengajaran Paravidya dan Aparavidya Sebagai Upaya Revitalisasi Pendidikan Hindu untuk Menciptakan Generasi Masa Depan yang Ilmiah dan Religius. Prosiding SEMAYA 2; Seminar Nasional Agama & Budaya, 39-53.
Eko, A. (2016, September 26). Latihan Disiplin Ala Paskibraka. Retrieved Desember 4, 2016, from Suara Pendidikan.net (news & Education): http://www.majalahsuarapendidikan.net/latihan-disiplin-ala-paskibraka.html
Fajri, F. A. (2016, Oktober 27). KOMPAS.com Megapolitan. Retrieved Desember 4, 2016, from News: Pelajar Tewas dalam Tawuran di Bekasi: http://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2016/10/27/16040511/pelajar.tewas.dalam.tawuran.di.bekasi
Sukandarrumidi. (2006). Metodologi Penelitian, Petunuk Praktis untuk Peneliti Pemula. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University.
Goleman, D. (2015). Emotional Intelligence. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Hadari, N., & Hadari, H. (2006). Instrumen Penelitian Bidang Sosial. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University.
Hamdiyati, Y. (2008). Cara Membuat Kajian Pustaka. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Harmer, J. (2007). How to Teach English. England: Pearson.
Hutagalung, I. (2015). Teori-Teori Komunikasi dalam Pengaruh Psikologi. Jakarta: Indeks.
Ioana. (2010, Maret 23). Responsibiliti or Asthma in Heart Chakra; Gandhi & Yoga about King Rama on Ram Navami. Retrieved Pebruari 1, 2017, from Sahaja Yoga Halton: http://www.free-meditation.ca/archives/4798
Iskandar. 2009. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan dan Sosial. Jakarta: Gaung
Persada Press
Kemenhumham. (2005, Mei 16). PP No. 19 Tahun 2005. Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia: Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia.
Kemdikbud. (2016). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI). Retrieved Pebruari
Kemendikbud. (2016). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Retrieved Pebruari 1,
Kemendiknas. (2012). Pedoman Pendidikan Karakter pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Jakarta: Direktur Jenderal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Nonformal, dan Informal - Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional.
Kemenhumham. (2003). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003: Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Lufri. (2007). Kiat Memahami Metodologi dan Melakukan Penelitian. Padang: UNP Press
Marzuki. (2005). Metodologi Riset, Panduan Penelitian Bidang Bisnis dan Sosial. Yogyakarta: Ekonesia.
Moleong, L. J. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mukhopadhyay, N. (2004). How to Build Character. Nadia: Vivekananda Mudranalaya.
Nasution, S. (2004). Metode Research (Penelitian Ilmiah). Bumi Aksara.
Overbaugh, R. (2004). An Overview of Jerome Brunner His Theory of Construktivism. Old Dominion University.
Perni, I. (2016). Peluan dan Hambatan Merealisasikan Institusi Pendidikan Berbasis Hindu dalam Menciptakan Generasi Religius dan Ilmiah. Proseding SEMAYA 2; Seminar Nasiona Agama & Budaya, 74-79.
Poespowardojo, T., & Seran, A. (2016). Diskursus Teori-Teori Kritis. Jakarta: Kompas.
Prasad, R. (2015). Ashtanayikas in Ramayana. International Journal of Recent Advances in Organizational Behaviour and Decision Sciences (IJRAOB), An Online International Research Journal (ISSN: 2311-3197), Vol: 1 Issue 3.
Riduwan. (2010). Metode dan Teknik Menyusun Tesis. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Robandi, B. (2005). Hand Out Mata kuliah Landasan Pendidikan. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Sai Baba, B. S. (2008). Hikayat Sri Rama; Pancaran Keindahan yang Suci Jilid 3 (Ramakatha Rasavahini). Jakarta: Yayasan Sri Sathya Sai Baba Indonesia.
Sani, R. A. (2014). Inovasi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Sanjaya, H. (2013). Penelitian Pendidikan - Jenis, Metode dan Prosedur. Jakarta: Kencana.
Sarwono, S. W. (2014). Teori-Teori Psikoanalisis Sosial. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Srinivasan, R. (1998). The Ethics of Humanism in the Ramayana; Sita's Perspective. In L. P. Vyas, Ramayana; International Perspective. New Delhi: BRPC.
Subama, M., & Sudrajat. (2005). Dasar-Dasar Penelitian Ilmiah. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Subramaniam, K. (2003). Mahabharata. Surabaya: Paramita.
Subramaniam, K. (2007). Ramayana. Surabaya: Paramita.
Sudarsana, I. (2016). The Importance of Morals Teaching in Shaping the Students' Characters in School. DAFIS 2016; Dharma Acarya Faculty International Seminar Proceeding Book, 367-376.
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sukandarrumidi. (2006). Metodologi Penelitian, Petunjuk Praktis Untuk Peneliti pemula. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University.
Susanto, D. (2012). Pengantar Teori Sastra. Yogyakarta: Caps.
Suyanto. (2010). Implementasi Pesan Moral dan Budaya untuk Anak Usia Dini Melalui Produk Kreatif Pentas Wayang Purwa. Penelitian Hibah Kompetensi. Solo: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Titib, I. (1996). Veda Sabda Suci Pedoman Praktis Kehidupan. Surabaya: Paramita.
Toates, F. (2009). Burrhus F. Skinner. England: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tunggono, E., Tirtaatmadja, I., & Elizabeth. (2010). Pemaparan Penggambaran Tokoh dalam Cerita Ramayana di Relief Candi Panataran di Blitar, Jawa Timur dengan Penggambaran Tokoh dalam Cerita Ramayana pada Wayang, Tarian, Patung dan Lukisan di Bali. Laporan Penelitian. Bandung: Universitas Kristen Maranatha.
UNC. (t.t.). Stone stele at Prambanan Temple shows Rama walking with monkey allies. Retrieved Pebruari 17, 2017, from LEARN NC: http://www.learnnc.org/lp/multimedia/2615
Vimalananda, S. (1997). Mahanarayana Upanisad. Surabaya: Sanata Dharmasrama.
Wardhani, N. S. (2016). Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan Melalui Penerapan Teknologi Pembelajaran ICT. Prosiding SEMAYA 2 Seminar Nasional Agama & Budaya, 54-64

Downloads

Published

31-03-2019

How to Cite

Ratni, N. P., Donder, I. K., & Sudarsana, I. K. (2019). Nilai Pendidikan Karakter Pada Tokoh Sri Rāma Dan Hanūmān Dalam Teks Rāmāyaṇa. Ganaya : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 2(1), 116–133. Retrieved from https://jayapanguspress.penerbit.org/index.php/ganaya/article/view/232

Issue

Section

Articles